Be a great writer

>be a great writer
>this is how you are remembered

It's interesting. You are wrong about him being a great writer, and wrong in your estimation that this is poor treatment.
Pretty cool.

I don't think the skeleton cares too much.

>be a great writer
>this is how you are remembered

How come vollmer is always described as pretty, yet she was actually pretty fucking ugly?

>great writer

Id rather be cremated desu

Why waste the wood

it's nice, OP
stop being a hater

Knowing Wilde, this is probably exactly how he wanted to go down in history.

I haven't even read Wilde and so I cannot comment on the quality of his writings, but the first respondent is of course perfectly correct in rebuffing the OP that the image is exactly how one should wish to be remembered: the site is garish, graffiti'd, and yes, ugly. And I, personally, hate graffiti.

It is also very /alive/. The site looks exactly like a trite commemoration for a celebrity who died last week, which if you want to be remembered, is exactly how things are supposed to work. And I'm perfectly confident that for every four un-serious hipster fans, there's a fifth who has actually read several of Wilde's works, actually liked them, actually got something out of them. You don't get that much love a hundred years on without having done something of value, even if it should fail to pass a longer-term test of history.

"If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead, either write something worth reading or do things worth writing.", goes the other trite trope attributed to Franklin (quotes are notoriously poorly accurately attributed, but this does not diminish the present rhetorical point): clearly, Wilde wrote something worth reading, as far as those pictures' thousand kisses testify, anyway. Which is sufficient to put the lie to OP's disgust at the garish temple, which of course yet maintains rules of decorum for celebrity gravesides, not being a Hitler or an Ed Gein, but someone socially acceptable, etc.