Name a problem science cannot solve or a question it cannot answer

Says right in the question, if it contained itself it wouldn't be in S... R u even trying? This board is not for us to do your homework.

Riemann Hypothesis

Why?

but if S is not in S it should be in S, since S contains sets that do not include them self.

the hard problem ;)

qualia

does god exist?

also, does there exist an algorithm to decide whether there's a solution to a diophantine equation over the integers?

Again, we're not here to do your tenth grade homework. The proof is trivial.

If the mind and the senses return accurate results.

What is being conscious?
Why does this phenomenon exist?
Is there anything beyond?

...

The problem is called russell's paradox, it isn't trivial, you just haven't understood it. It is roughly equivalent to the statement "This statement is a lie".

What is moral?
What is beauty?
What kind of government should we have?

>What is beauty?
That's pretty easy.

>What is moral?
That's also fairly easy.

>What kind of government should we have?
That's completely unsolvable, only heuristics can be applied.
That's even if we somehow agree on some kind of well-defined goal for the government.

learn english

Will OP ever stop sucking cocks?

The world might never know.

A concise definition of consciousness

events that are not reproducible

s is the null set

consciousness

gg

>beauty
Subjective
>moral
Subjective
>government
Depends on the circumstances of your society. Personally I think a limited constitutional monarchy with some measure of democratic input or something similar would be the best for a society in the long run.

>Depends on the circumstances of your society. Personally I think a limited constitutional monarchy with some measure of democratic input or something similar would be the best for a society in the long run.
not science

>What is moral?
Subjective, ie, can be unraveled via reverse engineering a given machine, within a given context.

>What is beauty?
As above. Human perception of beauty clusters heavily, although it's a fairly wide spectrum of possibilities that depends on a number of factors.

>What kind of government should we have?
As above. After you've defined a metric for what makes something viable, you can look at how a collection of machines can be expected to work and design around that. We certainly have enough history to know what works and what doesn't, but we're too much of a broken mess to stop being made to smash our head against the wall trying the same thing over and over and being surprised when it fails in familiar ways. These ways of functioning promote very useful power structures, which is why it shakes out in the same patterns era after era.

It's all very simple stuff. Personally, I like philosophy, but positing questions like this makes me kind of understanding why uninformed people come to talk such shit about it.

Social Sciences are a grey area.

...

it isnt

those are philosophical questions

Golden ratio?

which reynolds number is the divide between laminar and turbulent flow?

metaphysicist.com/puzzles/many/

...

Why does the moon appear so big?

Gravity

Dark matter

Consciousness

memedrive

what are those

>Biological Mortality
>Aging
How is that not solvable? Every reaction will come to an end eventually, even if it's a chain of billions chemical reactions that happen simultaneously. That's because no chemical reaction possesses infinite energy to just go on for ever.

>What is moral?
Whatever biological creatures evolutionary developed to be their social instincts, so their group is able to survive.

>What is beauty?
Being beautiful deeply correlates with good genes that give you a healthy and functional body. In other words beauty is the indicator for that and your subconscious is able to recognize that. You will consider those people attractive. That's why people exist that ANYONE would say are attractive. Beauty only starts being subjective when your body is looking to compensate its own personal biological deficiencies in their offspring. Then there will be specific people who can fulfill that personal need.

>What kind of government should we have?
Pure democracy. No legislative institutions. Citizens will instead directly vote for any issue and topic themselves. No representatives.

You can't avert answering a question by claiming that they are "philosophical questions." They are problems that science can not answer, it's not like he is asking "What is the meaning of life?" He's asking a question based on the existence of the universe and itself, which is most definitely science related.

Why doesn't my PCR work?

What color was the T-rex? What was its mating habits like?

Maybe your primers are bad. What's their melting temp?

Well, I was assuming this thread is about problems science cant solve (yet), but that should be solvable or are theoretically possible to solve somehow and not about philosophical ones

How, exactly, does science fiction, internet pornography and enormous amounts of high fructose corn syrup make people so stupid?

Show your work, smart guy. I want my own zombie army. I expect to see equations, diagrams, corpses, and probably a lot of semen bacause that's just how these things always seem to work, but you aren't leaving this room until I have my army. You will have all the money you need. Just do it.

So you know nothing about science?

>pure democracy
You have much too high of an expectation for the average man. People are lazy, and after a while they will get fed up with having to put every tiny little thing up to a vote. Also, it would take forever to implement even the slightest change, since absolutely everything has to be voted on, tallied, and implemented. People like the idea of voting, but they would lack the patience for absolute democracy.

is the holocaust a lie?

How does turbulence works? How to successfully model it?

Why does anything exist?

Was the murder of Harambe a morally righteous act?

Where does an electron get its charge?

is 0 a natural number?

And was it racially motivated? Would they have spared an albino gorilla?

What EXACTLY is science?

What are the psychological characteristics of a person unironically voting for trump? There must be some common undiscovered mental illnes that we can possibly treat in the future

Whats the cure for dandruff

Weak bait

all flow is turbulent, laminar flow is just an approximation

Why do kids love the delicious taste of cinnamon toast crunch?

Why OP is a faggot

>supernatural stuff

>Name a problem science cannot solve or a question it cannot answer.

Evangelion ending

The mortal matrix problem

Yes. They will get into their automatic cars one day, but instead of taking them to work, they will be promptly transported to the nearest thought correction facility. The mechanical error will be corrected, and then they will be free to go to back to working.

"Subjective" is a description of the experience of beauty and is not beauty itself. Subjective experiences do not eliminate objectivity. If the appreciation of beauty is a subjective experience, it does not follow that there is no objective beauty.

>Personally, I like philosophy
>[ethics, politics, and aesthetics are] all very simple
>mfw
Your arrogance astounds me..

>good genes
>attractive
>healthy body
>functional body

They are examples of beauty and not a definition of it.

Science cannot solve this question:

Why is science important?

>>[ethics, politics, and aesthetics are] all very simple
>Your arrogance astounds me
Most Veeky Forums users are like that though.

Why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch

Are we living in a computer simulation?

>inb4 Nick please go

Energy has been streaming from the Sun (and chemical energy from the Earth) for life's chemical reactions for about 4 billion years. And it will continue for a good while still. Therefore your argument is invalid and stupid.

Give me an example of something that is objectively beautiful. Our perception of beauty is based upon our personal experiences with aesthetically pleasing examples, so it would seem to me that beauty is entirely subjective

Everybody loves a lover,
Kim loves Eric
Everybody loves everybody

(Because Kim loves Eric, Everybody loves Kim. Because Everybody loves Kim, everybody loves everybody.)
t. some shitty symbolic logic course

pls teach me computational chemistry, cramer-sama

Who am I?

how much chuck wood a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck chuck chuck wood?

>'problem'

There aren't any. Everything lives, dies and that's it.

Eternal life

checkmate

GET READY BOYS
youtube.com/watch?v=pu4uL7deCNw&list=PLkNVwyLvX_TFBLHCvApmvafqqQUHb6JwF&index=1

>What are the psychological characteristics of a person ironically voting for trump? There must be some common undiscovered mental illnes that we can possibly treat in the future
ftfy

>It is another philosophy thread
Why cant Veeky Forums stop leaking their "LE EBIN SMART PARADOX" here and pretend they are geniuses?

Z adds syn, E adds anti.

what was the cause of the universe?
what is consciousness?