Is there any validity to the claim that dinosaurs were not real?

Is there any validity to the claim that dinosaurs were not real?

No, unless you are talking phylogenetically in which case there is a semantic argument

Are those components of a fabricated "dinosaur" of a fossil?

Uh.... y-yeah, dinosaurs are totally real, dude... No need to think so hard about it. There's nothing to see here! Move along!

I'm pretty sure that the argument is that they didn't look like what we think they did.

It might be valid to varying degrees, but modern simulation/optimization
algorithms that are based on the skeleton morphology are pretty definitive.

If dinosaurs didn't exist, how do you explain birds.

Checkmate theists.

birds are dinosaurs by definition and those are definitely real

How do you have proof of dinosaurs? You say fossil evidence, but you only have seen one in museums. You've never held a fossil in your hand, especially one from a supposed 100 million year old reptile. Second of all, why is there no trace of them today? If you believe in the theory of evolution, then when they were wiped out, why weren't all the other species wiped out? If all living species died out, why aren't there any signs of bacteria that started life like it happened millions upon millions of years ago? Why were there still living organisms? Also, how would the dinosaurs of the ocean died? Third, based off of a published scientific article called "Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?" it cites that the maximum stress or force that can be exerted by any muscle is independent of body-size and is the same for mouse or elephant muscle. If you take the strongest animals muscular ability, then they can lift nearly 6 times their own body weight. When scaled up to 70,000 pounds it is impossible for them to even stand up, let alone walk around and manage to feed themselves. Also, a supposed dinosaur such as a Brontosaurus is 5 to 10 times larger than an elephant. Elephants have to eat for 18 hours a day in order to survive, and with the supposed size of the brontosaurus, they would have to eat between 90 to 180 hours a day, which as we all know, is impossible. Even if it ate food 3 times faster than an elephant, it still would be unable to do anything else. Also, with the supposed "large amount" of dinosaurs that are supposed to be in existence, how was there enough food and water to sustain them for millions of years, when as an entire earth we are running out of clean water to drink. To put in comparison, when the rabbit invaded Australia, the tiny animals destroyed large tracts of vegetation, leading to the extinction of many plant species. It would also cause the soil to wash or blow away, causing soil nutrients to be low for new plants to develop.

Wait, the above picture claims that dinosaur bones are simply the bones of other creatures.

But, like, some of those bones aren't found in modern creatures. So they must either believe that a significant number of creatures have gone extinct in the 6000 years since god's creation of the earth, or that significant amounts of evolution have happened in that time span.

Also, if you're willing to believe in multiple extinctions, what's stopping you from believing dinosaurs existed but went extinct?

what gives OP

still doesn't explain how birds exist 2/10 bait