Why does Veeky Forums circlejerk stirner when marx destroyed him?

why does Veeky Forums circlejerk stirner when marx destroyed him?
Does this board really love the underdog?

We hate Marx after the redpill won

So take him back to tumblr, sweetheart

while marx did out do stirner, his attack on him is actually kind of sad
stirner is definitly wrong though, it's pretty clear when you read hegelians for a bit, but he deliberately moved himself into an "undebunkable" position, so it's hard to engage him

apparently there's a rare book by a late young hegelian that does a good job of dismantling him

>Marx
>not the original redpill
>(((We)))

/pol/ was a mistake

you got a link to marx's criticism on stirner? I can't seem to find anything

Pic related.

Funny thing is that Stirner was still right.

We've grown up, cuck

Move along, kid

...

The son is not wrong. Racism is not a bad thing. There's a natural hierarchy, KEK

>race is a relevant biogical category
I bet you haven't even read Charles Darwin.

>i bet you haven't even read outdated scientific works

See white world and compare it to black world, i.e. Western civilization and Africa.

See what my people created and see how the others spent their time living in shit huts and raping children.

Marxist thinking that's racist doesn't change FACTS

fucking cuck

He really didn't though, he just ripped his attack on Feuerbach from Stirner. Marx was a big fan of Feuerbach and Proudhon before he encountered Stirner and was forced to distance himself from that sort of naive humanism. Don't confuse gigantic rhetorical polemics that go nowhere, like his "Herr Vogt" meltdown, for something of actual substance. Marx had a habit of ripping off ideas then not giving any credit for them which was fairly common in those days.

>natural selection
>outdated
This is your brain on /pol/.

>what is material conditions???
>le facts, objectivity, rationalism, logic, and truth
>tips meme

>>natural selection
>>outdated
>This is your brain on /pol/.
Nice reading comprehension dork.

Charles Darwin is the progenitor and the best expounder of the theory of natural selection.

>evolutionary biology hasn't moved forward in any way in one and a half century

LMAO FUCKING REKT HIM
fucking KEK amirite XD

>libcuck 'discourse' and arguments

Numale leftist feminists, everyone

>evolutionary biology isn't still based on natural selection theory

>marx destroyed him?
Marx was just butthurt that he got BTFO

...

>I said that

are u gayers gonna fall for this guy that pretends to be from /pol/ every single time?

You said it was outdated.

The German Ideology, senpai

Also,
>Being this politically illiterate

What do you mean by 'it'?

Define what.

Shan't.

Both of you just kill yourselves. You're both fucking retards and nothing you can say with salvage that now.

more like Karl BARKS lmao

>fucking retards
>say with salvage that now

The only relevant post on this thread t b h

>Still a fucking retard

Also,
>Trying this hard to prove oneself on an image board

Also,
>Trying to look like you're not fuming

...

>ignore the historicity of economic and cultural relations between different peoples

I'm not defending Marx or the mush-head liberalism of today, but you don't help anyone when you do this. No good comes from lying user.

In the end, while class analysis is still off the mark, as many people who have been responsible for human progress were members of the aristocratic class, it is a more sound basis on which to base your political assumptions. Ultimately, ideas are the most telling because not everyone thinks or acts according to their skin color or social standing.

>Still a fucking retard

Also,
>Trying this hard to prove oneself on an image board

Also,
>Trying to look like you're not fuming

>memetext
>implying I actually care
>implying you're not a hypocrite: "I-I'm superior t-t-to you both!"
>implying you're not mad: "f-fucking retards!"

>Still a fucking retard

Also,
>Trying this hard to prove oneself on an image board

Also,
>Trying to look like you're not fuming

Saty mad butbou

What a quality picture Now will all of you fucks talk about Marx v Stirner now? Here, I'll start: Stirner Marx Stirner Marx

>Marx Stirner
>only one letter difference

Differences between societies are partly cultural, partly genetic. The latter are less relevant yet still present, as indicated by various studies. At least it's proven that intelligence is, to the considerable extent, inheritable.

>>Our meeting in Venice was pure coincidence.

What's that from.

>styrofoam cat
Are you high? That's clearly cardboard.

You probably mean Karl Schmidt's The Realm of Understanding and the Individual.
I went on a search once for the German original and found nothing. Best I could find was the second part (The Individual) in English.