Read this then go read a book. Don't waste your time here

Read this then go read a book. Don't waste your time here.

theguardian.com/books/2001/dec/22/fiction.dondelillo

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WVl3BJoEoAU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Don Delillo is a Jewish pervert, take the redpill kid

>Article about terrorism
>20 paragraphs until the first mention of "Islam" and even then it's some Tumblr-tier platitude about how terrorists aren't practicing 'real' Islam
Don DeLillo is a hack. Every book of his is exactly the same. Zero K would not have been published if he wasn't Don DeLillo.

Who are you quoting?

Of any story why did you choose this crock of shit?

>thinking that greentext is only for quoting

>terrorists aren't practicing 'real' Islam
but they aren't?

>it's not their fault, it's America's fault

that's deep, donny

>Y-yeah! It's.. j-just the... e-ex-extremists!

(You)

jesus christ, at some point there are diminishing returns on this right-wing reactionism.

>I cant read

>I cant punctuate

Yes, and every Christian alive today would participate in The Crusades if given a chance too.

Fuck off back to /pol/ and take your assinine blanket statements with you.

When Islamic wing fundamentalism is objectively worse but you still bitch about right wing reactionaries

The prophet Muhammad was a warlord and a pedophile and is considered the ideal Muslim. "Moderate" Muslims aren't real Muslims.

>centre
>defenceless
Did... did the guardian seriously bongify Delillo? Do they always do this?

>I read it on Facebook, man!

You'd get banned on Facebook for saying that even though it's historical fact.

is dellillo really an islamic apologist?

>bully destroy severe nations for practically nothing
>millions of family get kill
>someone hits back
>OMG WHY THEY DO IT SUCH EVIL :::'c XD

islamic terror attacks are literally validated directly from the Quran. a christian could technically do the same thing with the bible but we don't see that happen. why?

Youre acting like blue collar white uncles dont love spouting that shit all over Facebook.

not an argument

Islam has been attacking Christian Europe for 1300 years.

Neither is your /pol/secution complex

once again not an argument

Here's an argument, then: You're a huge faggot.

How's that?

that may or may not be true, but at least i don't have cognitive dissonance which you are demonstrating right now

...

me on the right, you on the left

this article is 15 years old. given the speed at which the world changes now, especially as regards developments in global terrorism, what relevance could it possibly have?
>hint: none

because we live in a 1st world country you fucking ass.

im going to explain to you why you have cognitive dissonance. you are assuming im like the guy in your pic because i hold conservative views (or at least when it comes to islam). so this is a prejudgement on your part and ultimately assigning an identity to me based on a particular view.

however, you are also condemning us for "generalizing" muslims, the same exact tactic you are doing. hence, cognitive dissonance

are you saying that islamic terrorism doesn't happen in 1st world countries? are you kidding me?

i'm sure they started it :)

>are you saying that islamic terrorism doesn't happen in 1st world countries? are you kidding me?
Are you fucking retarded?
They are members of a terrorist organization from a third world country.

I'm a leftist tho. Why don't you provide an actual argument instead?

Christianity went through the enlightenment and modern Christians are influenced by the ideals set forth by the enlightenment.

Some of them were born here, cf. most of the recent attacks and would-be attacks in Belgium and France.

right because if those good 'ol oppressed muslims just had more money and lived in a 1st world country then they'd LOVE the west!

btw many islamic terrorists are bred in 1st world countries hence grew up in luxury

fucking brain dead leftists...

this is nice off-topic thread

>2nd generation immigrants
>Putting them on the same level as natives & 23rd generation immigrants when it's widely established that 2nd generation immigrants tend to be MORE radical than 1st generation immigrants due to, among other things, an overwhelming sense of rootlessness

Calling them extremists implies that they even belong to islam, and that they're not just using it as a persuasive reason and/or bait for newcomers.
They are terrorists born from a shithole, that got worse after getting bombed to bits, most of these extremists leaders are people from countries who had nothing to do with terrorism and grew to hate america for what they did to their country seemingly without reason.
I would not consider myself a leftist, but this reactionary bullshit that you have to be an extreme fucking right-winger to counteract the leftist extremists is absolutely ridiculous, and speaks volumes to what the american political system has done to its people. "the good side vs the bad side," "blue vs red." what a fucking joke.

yeah man, i'm sure all those white swedes were corrupted since birth with the islamic cool-aid and were not just easily corrupted because they were retarded fucking kids.

nice

>be normal islamic kid
>9/11 happens
>everyone calls you a terrorist
>become a terrorist
gee, i wonder.

ITT:

>Implying terrorism isn't the logical conclusion of the hyperanomie of late-stage capitalism
>Implying the only reason terrorism is done by muslims instead of westerners isn't that muslims are the only ones upset enough by current degeneracy to act on it IRL whereas westerners are so sedated with porn and consumption that they can only be assed to post impotent anger on /pol/ about it
>Implying /pol/tards and muslim terrorists don't essentially want the same thing
>Implying /pol/ users and muslim terrorists don't hate freedom equally much

>implying 3 caused 4
>implying 4 wasn't actually the result of 1

The fucking mental gymnastics you have to perform to say they are not at all related to Islam is mindblowing. I get that you're trying so hard to fit in with the current bullshit attitude of the media but all of you who keep spouting their "progressive" opinions like they're facts are welcome to come to Germany, France, Sweden, UK, or Belgium to get a taste of diversity, you fucking cunts.

Also, the constant /pol/ boogeyman non-arguments are getting tiresome. I urge you to visit Germany and take a look at the situation. Look at the crime statistics, the urging of police and media not to report anything, and then come back and honestly try to say these things are a welcome addition to our cultures. Yes, and it does have something to do with Islam: just ask the perpetrators.

that is exactly what i'm implying.

um . . . who the heck are you guys even quoting ? ? ? ?

>a country's only source of culture and behaviorism is religion

>DFW
>college Marxist

Seems about right. Fresh off /mu/?

>Implying /pol/tards and muslim terrorists don't essentially want the same thing

It doesn't even surprise me you're retarded. Go ask those muslims if they want a secular or Christian nation-state.
But keep thinking you've got it all figured out because you read in on your facebook feed.

>Implying terrorism isn't the logical conclusion of the hyperanomie of late-stage capitalism

Psst, Noam.

You're not relevant anymore.

watch this with an open mind

youtube.com/watch?v=WVl3BJoEoAU

>sam "reddit" harris
fucking incredible

at least listen to his arguments

>Seems about right. Fresh off /mu/?

0/3 correct.

>Go ask those muslims if they want a secular or Christian nation-state.

/pol/tards generally want to instate conservative states based on religion, because they're triggered hard by the kind of freedom they don't like ("degeneracy"). Jesus or Muhammad, both groups just hate freedom and can't handle their autism when people live in a way they don't approve of, making all of them gargantuan fucking faggots.

Le not an argument.

>Sam Harris
i literally cannot.

Why read this? It should atleast have been something about reading, not about terror. I guess OP must be one of the constantly triggered redditors who've started coming here the last few months.

No, because Muhammad, their prophet and the most perfect man in history was such a peaceful guy.

>Don't call people violent otherwise they'll behead you!
Your reasoning.
>/pol/tards generally want to instate conservative states based on religion
/pol/ is generally secular - their worship of Trump as God-Emperor notwithstanding.
>Jesus or Muhammad, both groups just hate freedom
Difference being is that the Jesus crowd doesn't want to bake cakes for homosexual weddings and the Islamic crowd wants to hang homosexuals from construction cranes. The respective desires of both groups is not equivalent.

Take the redpill you retarded bookfag

too bad you're unwilling to at least listen to his arguments.

>the most perfect man in history was such a peaceful guy.
yeah my man, the all-loving bible god is also very peaceful :^)
and muhammad ever only talked about killing prosecutors.

Who are you guys quoting?
Lots of yellow-text in this topic haha

i don't need to listen to an uneducated hack like sam harris, he has nothing new or insightful to say. i will read your tl;dr if you have one, though.

you're being lazy and unintellectual but ok

islamic terrorism is directly related to the Quran and martyrdom is rewarded via paradise. fundamentalists truly believe this. the small minority of radial muslims is a myth and vast numbers of muslims polled worldwide hold some kind of radical view. islam has a chance at reformation but the chance of doing so in a timely fashion is very small

Oh man I didn't post this to talk about terrorism. I shouldn't have come back

what else is there to talk about
fucking bookfags, why does this board even exist

You should have posted an actually good story.

>muhammad ever only talked about killing prosecutors.
You don't know anything about Muhammad.

Christians aren't supposed to mimick the God of the OT though, and Jesus overwrites alot of the OT stuff, so yeah Christianity is at its core a peaceful religion, while Islam is the exact opposite. There's also the fundamental fact that in Christianity and Judaism all the calls for violence (not for Chrisitianity) in the OT happened for a specific time and place, while Islam is full of commandments to wage war and suppress the Kuffar which are eternally valid.

Exactly, which is why sikhs and Hindu second gen immigrants in the west commit as much terrorism as muslims.

>inb4 you bombed their countries, they're forced to slaughter innocent people down in the streets of Paris!
Then why haven't USA had much problem with South-East Asian terrorism or Latino american terrorism.
America sure fucked those places up, yet these people don't commit terrorism against innocent American/Western civilians at a weekly basis.