ITT: We list words and phrases used exclusively by brainlets

ITT: We list words and phrases used exclusively by brainlets.

I'll start:

>bayes' theorem
>nash equilibrium
>cryptography
>superposition
>qualia
>higgs boson
>prisoners' dilemma
>pi
>coding
>cognitive biases
>utility function
>p-value
>hilbert space
>consciousness

>>bayes' theorem
someone hasn't read Probalistic Robotics

don't forget
>brainlets

Philosophy

>I will hastily cede concepts of genuine scientific relevance because fools at times/often misunderstand and misuse them
You may as well give up then.

HEY


hey

Superposition is real... in geology
Don't you shit on our laws

>black swan

Who knew, another engineer who can't read gud.

>Green's Theorum

>Riemann hypothesis

>"it evolved that way"

>pure mathematics

>We list words and phrases used exclusively by brainlets.

>phenomena (especially when using it as a singular)

>the multiverse

>one to one functon

>chaos theory

>300 k starting

>IQ

>triple integrals

...

>I'm taking "real analysis"

p-value is used in practically every scientific supported by experimental data ever. You're a fagget harry

>brainlets
>"words and phrases"
>exclusively

>entropy is disorder

>electron wave/particle duality

>p-value
So anyone who works with statistics in pretty much any capacity is a brainlet?

>Godel

top kek

this nigga

>i dont like p values
> i dont like bayesian statistics either
> wah wah wah
> i want my dummy

/thread

>what's the evolutionary purpose of

>Will aging be cured before I die?

some of you are seriously the biggest faggots I've ever seen

not exclusively but this is usually see in pseudo intellectual debates
>ignorant
>ignorance
>irrational
>logical
>reason
>scientific
>science

don't forget
>racist
>sexist
>xenophobic
>alt-right

>8343971

>nano-

>Space X

>designing such a shit experiment that you need statistics at all

brainlet detected

>nash equilibrium

what should i call it when neither player can improve their strategy? i have to use this word a lot =(

>brainlet
>ITT
>we

>category theory

Thank you.

This. Everyone is just circlejerking over people they don't like.

> implying technical terms are only used by non-technical turds
> i shiggy diggy

Belphegor's prime

do you prefer 'its the plesiomorphic condition' then user ?

user is one of those amerifags who doesnt 'do' statistics. fucking kekaroonie.

would love to see your research publications sans-stats famalam- unless you are publishing in the Saudi Arabian Journal of evolutionary biology, i'm going to venture a guess and say they're not existent

>scientific infant detected

>polynomial