Ok so I get it, we live in a society where most writers are male for TV, movies...

Ok so I get it, we live in a society where most writers are male for TV, movies, as well as other types of fiction like fantasy, comics. They also are the ones more likely to be popular because of that. With that said, we see things more often form the male prospective and I hard this claimed multiple times that is often extends to things like sexuality. However, the people I have discussions with about it often speak as if men are the ones that usually fail(obviously not all) at this while women usually don't. Obviously since we have more content written by men it seems so. Can't it just be a symptom of men simply not being women(unless they do research) rather than inherent sexism or misogyny? I'm not saying it could never be that but c'mon.
Women writers can be quite one-sided as well in favoring the women's perspective sex over male often too. And I'm not just talking about YA novelist. Now, I don't know how many of you read erotica or any works that feature sex, but I don't agree that this one-sidedness is generally only a male problem unless someone can provide me numerous examples otherwise.
>inb4 /pol/, /r9k/, or any other fedoras.
I just want to have a genuine discussion about this and if you're from any of those boards you can just leave.

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

Didn't read a word of this fyi

>With that said, we see things more often form the male prospective
>form the male prospective

WHAT KIND OF TRANNY PORN ARE YOU ON, KID?

I'm talking about feminists who say that males writers are mostly sexist and for their one sided portrayal of sexuality in most works as if men are the only ones who suffer from this problem.
How about you actually read instead of being a tl;dr faggot.

Look, right, you can't force people to consume what you write. You have to cater it to the place it's being posted. Here on Veeky Forums, we like memes and the writings of memes.

I've still not read what you wrote and I'm growing quite impatient.

Ok I meant from* the male perspective
sorry. I'm not on my computer keyboard obviously.

If they actually wanted more books with sex from the female perspective they would write books with it. no, they just want to complain about something. Being a feminist is the hobby of complaining.

But that's not my main point. My point is writing from a one-sided few shoulsn't just be assumed to be a male problem. Women can do this too and have already because let's face it: women aren't men just like men aren't women! So why make it look like men are sexist for messing this up a lot as a group? How about just ill informed?

Life ain't fair, man. The Pussy Pass is a powerful thing. The sooner you come to terms with the fact that women can literally get away with murder simply because they are women the better. You can spend your time stooping to their level and never actually getting anything done; however, that's what they want you to do.
>feminist are just female trolls
>they get some twisted satisfaction out of disrupting your life

festering

>I don't agree that this one-sidedness is generally only a male problem
I don't think educated feminists believe that it's exclusively a male problem, either. It's just that a majority of popular and canonical material is written by men (although this is changing)

The point you think you're making is actually just iterating what that user was talking about: feminists complain just to complain. Yes they have double standards. This isn't a secret. It's also not a secret that they are completely ineffectual at inspiring any kind of change, most serious people tuned out feminists nearly 2 decades ago when their academic analysis began eating itself alive.

>Can't it just be a symptom of men simply not being women(unless they do research) rather than inherent sexism or misogyny?
>rather than inherent sexism or misogyny?

gee i wonder why they don't 'do research'

it's pretty easy to see which feminists make good points and the others that are just copying feminist talking points. i don't get this lazy 'all feminists are the same' thing

I have this feeling OP.
but mostly for games.
I keep telling /v/ most games don't really catter to females and shit like non combat, emotions, socializing aren't really represented in games too much.

they usually can't understand my point or try to refute it or call me a sexist pig.

elaborate.

l'm not saying men and women alike shouldn't work to over come this by perhaps some research or even collaboration. This goes more for men, I guess, since they make up most of the writers(though women should also make more content I agree). I'm saying let's not make this seen as if it is mostly a male problem.
How is 50 shades of Grey not a onesided perspective on sex for women for example?
I'm sure some men can argue that i didn't represent their experience. Why is the author not seen as sexist or at least ignorant for not even trying?

Lazy? Ignorant? Don't know how?
But why do the women also not do this and why are they not seen in the a bad light? Why is it only assumed to be hateful for men? Yes, I understand ore scrutiny will be on men o make an effort since they are the majority of writers but c'mon to write them off as inherently misogynistic is quite assuming and unfair.

>just copying feminist talking points
That's all 3rd-wave feminism is, a circlejerk of vague, irrefutable claims about "systematic" problems without any suggestion of how to solve these problems or detailed arguments of what they even are.

Maybe women should be raised to be like men. Honest to God I think that would solve a lot of civilization's problems. "Femininity" and everything associated with it is a horrible fucking cancer, and feminism's attempts to legitimize it are awful. Just chuck it all and teach women to cultivate classically masculine virtues.

maybe the men are misogynistic so they don't research

maybe women follow the precedent of men

i don't see the point in being like 'hey what if you consider these other possibilities' then denying the original possibilities could in fact be legit -- especially when you're arguing for accountability on both sides

i've read this somewhere before

>denying original possibilities
Except one of those reasons I mentioned already point to sexism though so your post actually makes no sense. You just tried to(incorrectly) use my own logic against me for no reason.
I'm not necessarily arguing for accountability, more the end to the idea that one sided perspectives are necessarily purposefully done and only a male problem--rather than just a symptom of lacking the mind of the opposite sex.
Then there comes the issue of how one would go about doing research in the first place and then implement it properly into the work. "Research" I was actually kind of vague about desu. Cause let's face it, some people are just terrible writers.