Thoughts on Ernst Jünger? Just ordered Storm of Steel, what should I read beyond that?

Thoughts on Ernst Jünger? Just ordered Storm of Steel, what should I read beyond that?

"i shot teh gun very gudly. everytome i pulled the trigger one of the savages fell to tfe floor. war makes me tuff. i am a cool guy. not like the pussy kids of today."

'tey shot teh very gudly at me. evertim tey pulled the trigger my frens die. war make me sad. i am a sensitiv guy. not like dum dums who cause war'

-(((British))) war ''''''''''poets''''''''''

On The Marble Cliffs is pretty comfy, senpai

Nice
I have no idea. Storm of Steel was good, but the rest is a mystery.

>Sheltered liberal who has never read EJ

Storm of Steal is fantastic OP. EJ is a true man.

>all these babbys who think cola duty is real life
lmao

says the ignoramus who has never read eumswil or marble cliffs, which are obviously anti totalitarian.

Did you read Marble Cliffs? Did you not get the contrast between the totalitarian order and the old aristocratic order? The main characters were veterans..

What disgusted Junger about totalitarianism was precisely that civilians were turned into undisciplined savages and zealots, dehumanised. War was something ambiguous that tempered noble energies, and it had been turned into a petty political tool for brutes and butchers to lord over the disgusting mob. He wasn't anti-war.

You might enjoy Reck's Diary Of A Man In Despair, Reck had very similar opinions

says the cockmonger that has never read glass bees okaay

I got that the brutality in the forests to the north were the natural progression of war of the ranger, and that the main characters obviously lived in peace and plenty after a past life of violence. He obviously assigned an idyll to life on the cliffs, and the practice of naturalism, religion, and good company were far elevated above conflict. Did YOU read marble cliffs?

Not an answer to Junger's obvious disgust regarding modern conflict in the two stated works. Everyone forgets that storm of steel was his first work and that he matured past it, and also that his works in the 30s by their very nature got him out of denazification courts.

Good morning Herr Kaufmann. Shouldn't you be writing a sixteen-page footnote about how Nietzsche was secretly, esotorically proto-feminist and near-pathologically worshipful of Jews?

Revisionist whitewashing faggot. Go TA an English Lit class at a STEM university while people make fun of your gay hipster haircut because you're 34 and not fooling anyone. You have AIDS.

Sounds like You may be asspained and struggling to answer why placid, peaceful existence with nature and your fellow man is painted in such a favorable light in said work. I bet your hands are shaking as you look upon your replica iron cross thinking about how storm of steel justifying your lust for a war you never participated in.

>placid and peaceful
>ready to stoically take up arms at any time as a true warrior against a living caricature of warrior nobility

Are you sure I'm not interrupting your morning tweeting about gun control?

I strongly believe you did not read the works that you are commenting on. The protagonists end up fleeing the violence on a boat.

>I bet your hands are shaking as you look upon your replica iron cross thinking about how storm of steel justifying your lust for a war you never participated in.
S I K
B U R N

>I bet your hands are shaking as you look upon your replica iron cross thinking about how storm of steel justifying your lust for a war you never participated in.

Nice

Sturm is short and gives you a general idea what his philosophy is like. I also started reading 2 years ago his diaries, need to finish them some day

Why are alt-righters so cringe-worthy?

t. conservative socialist

Center right mater race

>"violence = war"
>not only didn't read the books, can't even read the posts he's replying to

Are you sure the Wikipedia summary of Farewell to Arms isn't more your speed? Or maybe just changing your tampon while crying?

...

>the events in marble cliffs aren't organized military conflict headed by "the ranger"
>the only times the veterans take up arms are on flaccid scouting expeditions, the only real defensive violence perpetrated is by a boy with snake magic.

As I said in my first fucking post, it's pretty much universally agreed that Junger is contrasting the urbanity and nobility of his traditional, conservative, warrior virtues with vulgar mob violence and frenzy. The ranger is a puffed-up caricature of legitimate martial authority, implying that such authority CAN be legitimate. That's why it's bad to ape it.

I was just fucking around before but I genuinely just feel bad for you that you can't read books except through the lens of some limp faggy presentism. You are one of those people who clenches their asshole when reading an author they like until they can find a tidy little way to rationalise away his racism or sexism.

What even is the "alt-right" ?

Does it exist outside the internet?

>Not enjoy war autobiographies for the epic human experience through harrowing, tumultuous events that they are
How's college going?

Made me grin

You letting me know that I made you grin also made me grin.

Thank you.

Uh you know that Junger released many revised editions of Storm and Steel, the Penguin English edition is the Post WW2 one (pretty much the one one can find today), but there there no drastic u-turn over his views on conflict. If you are not aware, Junger was part of the the German Conservatice Revolutionary movement and continued to associate with the anti-liberal Right after the war (see his lifelong correspondence with Gottfried Benn, Heidegger and Schmitt)