Why would any respectable institution put large sums in an unregulated asset manipulated by a few whales?

why would any respectable institution put large sums in an unregulated asset manipulated by a few whales?

Attached: mfw.jpg (251x242, 12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393217301666
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>muh whales
get off Veeky Forums, it's rotting your brain

Wont be unregulated for long. Then they become the whales. That's the point.

if you are a big player its literally a money printing machine. A totally unregulated easily manipulated market. What more could you want?

They wouldn't and they won't

Who do you think those whales are?

Attached: 1460136883671.png (1688x2000, 1.47M)

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393217301666
governments have better things to do than regulating chuck e cheese coins

To become the whales, and manipulate the unregulated market.

Because that "respectable" institution is the US government and it wants to tank BTC to zero as a warning against decentralizion attempts.

Oh you're the "chuck-e-cheese" guy. Remember to check in in 2020 when smart contracts are absolutely everywhere and remind us how smart you are.

They don't. Institutions getting in is a meme. It's crashing because it's all worthless.

your tinfoil hat's getting tight
almost every coin is an overvalued speculative piece of shit

So buy the ones that aren't and stop whining.
/thread

They won't. Blockchain has it's uses, but crypto is mostly shit.

what's ur fav one user? just curious

>Blockchain has it's uses, but crypto is mostly shit.
Public blockchains can't function without native tokens.
Private blockchains can't replace public blockchains.

Blockchain is a solution in search of a problem that has been around for a decade and hasn't done fucking shit. There's probably some obscure use case for it somewhere but it laughable to think that its going to be the new paradigm. Who the fuck really needs a distributed ledger? Obviously the answer is no one...

Only those who need a secured network.

>wants to tank BTC to zero as a warning against decentralizion attempts
lol you need psychiatric help

Really brainlet how so? How is it more secure than the current options?

You can ask btc, it hasn't been hacked. Then there are those projects thats can apply those principles in a way that make sense.