Did psychoanalysis get anything right about the human mind and nature?

please explain what he got wrong you megapleb

I don't have prove anything, because there's literally no reason for me to accept the methodology in the first place.

>muh dick obsession

Nope.

How many images are in your BBC folder?

...

>doesn't provide a response

>prove that psychoanalysis is wrong

ideologies cant be proved wrong, thats elementary school 101. they are argument proof, because of their religious cult like nature.

>psychoanalisys is wrong because x, y and z
>OMG UR RESISTING, TALK ME ABOUT UR MOTHR

Psychoanalysis isn't an ideology, moron, it's a theory and corresponding methodology.

First one to mention dicks.

First one to mention BBC.

Freud solved 19th century female hysteria, and replaced it for 20th century female hysteria.

That it's the same, with more male neurosis.

We have an unconscious level, and that unconscious level it's filled with repressed sexual toughts, the fact that we are more in contact with those repressed toughts doesn't change the fact that they are there.

William Reich was better anyway.

>William Reich was better anyway.

he was crazy as a goat.

Literally inverted Platonic tripartite soul with the added catch of "You have to pay me now and for the rest of your life, because no one is fully healed from the Oedipal complex, but my sessions can make you OK with being an upper-middle class petit bourgeois who ignores all the oppression he loads onto the lower classes."

> that face when Freud tells you your dream about a donkey's ass represents daddy's dick.

Everything is daddy's dick for Fascist Freud.

You clearly never read early sane Reich, instead of mad scientist orgon Reich.

Even Orgon therapy it's brilliant it was sexual therapy without mentioning sex.

It didn't solve cancer, but it did wonders for repressed american housewives.

>but it did wonders for repressed american housewives.

just like negro BBC nowadays.

>but it did wonders for repressed american housewives.

???

dey cured now?

>uses Freudian technique to disprove Freud

Tell that to Popper

The FBI stoped Reich from fixing them.

We'll have no sex wars, he was the first to introduce Indian and transcendental meditation techniques into psycho therapy.

He openly acepted orgasm as the cure for sexual repression.

And sexual satisfaction IS the cure for sexual repression.

Everybody else, and just read his books and followed his footsteps.

Even libido theory it's more of a Reich's son, than Freuds, he talked about sexual identity and the sexual problems of the workforce.

All of this while making a comprehensive analisis of Natsoc indoctrination techniques, in 1938 Germany.

Guy's so uber, I'll believe if he tell me he can control the weather.

The basic premise of psychoanalysis is the sexual determination of reality, or the ontological primacy of the sexual function. This notion is still among the unexamined prejudices of a great number of people. It is common today for people to speak of "their" sexuality, as if it were a life-style, or even a form of Being. Foucault, for instance, espouses a kind sexually determined Existenz philosophy, an emancipatory "praxis" of sexuality.

>He openly acepted orgasm as the cure for sexual repression.
>And sexual satisfaction IS the cure for sexual repression.

lol Reich doesn't know shit about physiology

enjoy your high prolactin and high cortisol, reichian retard

> be a pornstar, now you're free!

nope. it just makes the neurotic comfortably neurotic. just talk to any psychologist and you'll see how far gone they are.
don't be an apologist buddy, reich and orgone therapy is about the only interesting thing in psychology. in fact, although he never officially reported for fear of backlash from the scientific community, apparently there were a few cases of orgone accumulators curing cancer.

Yes, because having an orgasm it's the same as sexual promiscuity.

Having an orgasm doesn't make you a nymphomaniac.

Go read mass psychology of fascism, and then tell me, that he didn't knew nothing about psychology.

The discovery of muscle memory itself, make the guy an important part of the development of modern therapy.

I guess Popper can't be proved wrong..

>so that's how it went..
>you want to fugg your mom and kill your dad XDDDDD

...

haha that's so fr-king epic, you did a silly post in all green words and ended with a meme face

>move my arm
>Behaviourist: He moved his arm

My God, the insight!

The id, ego, and superego are accurate conceptualizations of mental structures that you have and operate under every day, so you probably have to view that as an astonishing human insight, even if he spouted a lot of coke-fueled insanity too.

Reich was onto the truth also, but -- as you can see from many posters here -- he still eludes most plebs. Funny thing is, it's so basic and logical that your physicality would influence your mind, which would then loop back and influence your physicality again, but there are a lot of people who prefer to believe they can abstract everything to ideas or free will, that they can "think it away". It's also possible that they're just bitter virgins who honestly don't realize that orgasming into a loving woman is not biologically identical to masturbating.

Meme post for a meme field.

>right

that's the part you're wrong

my head hurts

No, fucking no.

this

It has yet to be disproven that anyone who doubts psychoanalysis is afraid of it being used on them.

To be an active browser of Veeky Forums and to doubt the insights of psychoanalysis is the epitome of willful ignorance

I don't doubt psychoanalysis, but the point your trying to make eludes me.

don't mind him, he's just making posts on the internet. completely harmless pokemon.

>This thread is still up
Fuck off to Veeky Forums

freud is epitome of lit

this

the fuck do you know about anything

>Everything Freud came up with has been utterly discredited
>Veeky Forums, "the most intelligent board," unironically agrees with him

everything

U new here? That's not how greentexting works

>>Everything Freud came up with has been utterly discredited
Why do people who know virtually nothing about psychology say this? Is it because they know virtually nothing about psychology but have a lot of hot opinions anyways?

Spreading bullshit is the epitome of world wide web. Internet is 99% noise.

I think its because they have such little exposure to actual psychological theory and so just reify it into this grand subject supposed to know without realizing just how flimsy and pathetic cognitive-behaviourism is when you read into it

he said plebs ended up using sexuality as their reason d etre. just look around.

>omg he didnt tell me some absurd interpretation about my stupid life, i must be SO DULL!

read the hororscope if you want silly narratives to fit your dumb life, faggot.

what an arrogant fuck you're lol

Has anyone tried (((Lacanian Psychoanalysis)))?

MY LORD LMAO what a joke. How did that shit even get popular with scholars?

>troglodytes triggered this hard

I like Jung.

a flipped coin is a valid decisions maker as any, i bet you doubt tarot too nigga