> energy is not created
> energy is not destroyed
Their called Newton's LAWS for a reason, because e laws can be broken. How else can you explain this?
energy is not created
Mason Taylor
Other urls found in this thread:
Thomas Brown
Dark propulsion
You wouldn't understand.
Jaxson Lopez
It doesnt violate it
It uses the electricity to excite and shut photons out the rear
For about 100w you get something like 0.0001N of thrust
Tyler Bell
IT'S A BRASS CONE
IT DOES NOTHING.
Thomas Davis
>their
Adam Rivera
it pushes off of the dark matter
Xavier Cox
b8
Nolan Bennett
It converts radio waves into propulsion
Energy in energy out
Tyler Moore
Inelastic collisions transfer ample momentum in a system with boundary conditions equivalent to the milky way.
Jackson Long
>can't tell the difference between copper and brass.
This guy is an expert. Literally failed at regurgitating that the COPPER FRUSTUM is mentioned in just about every article.
Justin Torres
So is this bullshit? More 'free energy' nonsense?
because this seems like something that shouldn't be able to work. I'm skeptical. Seems like a hoax.
Gavin Cook
Thunderf00t did a beakdown
youtube.com
Nolan Hughes
Most of his arguments were retarded.
Oliver Garcia
All he did was compare power usage : thrust on the EM drive compared to more standard things
Logan Murphy
>compares it to chemical propulsion
>compares it to blowing on a scale
>LOOK ITS MORE POWERFUL
Jeremiah Young
Engineering error.
Colton Collins
Which is retarded.
The revolutionary aspect about the mEMe drive isn't that it will be useful anytime soon and take us to the far reaches of the Universe. It's that it literally violates the laws of physics. Our most basic ones.
Assuming the experiments are true, it doesn't matter if it produced 8 micro newtons of thrust or 8000. The fact of that matter is that thrust was generated, thus violating our known laws of physics. Period.
Ryder Scott
Consequences of erudite vernacular utilised irrespective of necessity
Michael Davis
kek
Aiden Gomez
This is what the inventor says, they just don't understand how.
Liam Morales
>It's that it literally violates the laws of physics. Our most basic ones.
Stop repeating this dumb meme
It doesnt violate any of them
Wyatt Richardson
Doesn't the EM drive emit photons as the EM radiation resonates against the drive? How does this violate newtons laws?
Kevin Price
Conservation of momentum
Levi Nguyen
Photons have mnomentum, pham.
Hudson Lopez
Put in 100w of power get 0.0001N of force
Photons have momentum, it's the same way those ion drives work except this uses photons instead of ions
William Campbell
I thought we agreed to call it dark momentum?