Why do biologists care about preserving species diversity, but not human diversity?

Why do biologists care about preserving species diversity, but not human diversity?

Humans become more diverse on interbreeding. Preservation of diversity is the promotion of the free movement of populations.

there is no evidence that human genetic diversity is significant enough to preserve.

pretty eye colors and skin color is an aspect of fashion not genetic diversity.

also biologists don't study human diversity. they study stamp collecting

>there is no evidence that human genetic diversity is significant enough to preserve.
Why does there have to be a reason? There's no evidence that certain cultures needs to be preserve yet people still care about that.

...

Is that supposed to be some sort of statement? I can make a chart of how close we are to Rhesus Monkeys and say we're basically the same too.

That's not really an argument against racism.

It's one against Racialism, however.

It's an argument against a naive concept of race, it's not saying there are no different races. The first graph is like Bohr's atomic model, expressing a correct idea with insufficient knowledge.

diversity is worth preserving for two reasons: ecology and autism/scientific interest
human diversity or lack thereof has no ecological effect.
scientific interest in human diversity is for shit tier humanities studies for brainlets(cultural diversity) , and geneticists.

what is this supposed to mean? that Europeans and Asians are actually Africans?
that Africans have all the genetic information any human has, like blue eyes and slanted eyes?

WE

>Essentialist
>a doctrine that certain traditional concepts, ideals, and skills are essential to society and should be taught methodically to all students, regardless of individual ability, need, etc.
huh?

Because keeping these endangered species alive is beneficial to the environment senpai

Exactly this. Europeans and Asians are Africans which some features changed due to selection

Pro tip, actually study biology and you'll figure it out for yourself.

Post 2 nails it, yet everyone just keeps posting. Quieten down, now.

>/pol/ will never leave
feels bad, man

>implying /pol/ isn't right sometimes.

or you could just explain it to an ignorant faggot like me

Not just species diversity.
Biodiversity, which is a measure of species diversity,species abundance and connectedness between all the parts of the system
>why not into human diversity
Preserving biodiversity IS preserving human diversity.
here is some copypasta from me explaining the pragmatic importance of preserving biodiversity and healthy ecological systems.
I told him to draw dots and connect them in a specific way that doesn't matter for this example.
>The dots and the lines connecting them can be measured as biodiversity.
If we where to map the entire earth system. There would many different colors and shapes of dots (species diversity) and numerous individuals of those species(population size) with countless lines running between them, no two alike running between them these represent biotic interactions( predator-prey relations, direct/indirect competition, symbiosis/mutualism/parasitism, pollination)
And the paper the spatial-temporal plane of the earth system that allows these connections and dots to exist,(climate, land/seascape connectivity, geology, ecological niches, migration and dispersal, ect. Throughout time)
These connections make every dot interrelated and co dependent
Now erase 60% of the dot species to correspond with the anthropocene mass extinction, tear the paper into millions of pieces to represent habitat fragmentation, then spill coffee on it all to represent habitat degradation, now throw them out the window to represent ecological regime change brought about by climate change. How long before those dots can reorganize into a system of similar complexity.
That's what we are looking at, we are the few scattered dots using everything that's left until our population crashes and we are reduced to hunter gatherer tribes surviving off of jellyfish and post consumer waste, until we eventually go completely extinct due to loss of genetic diversity.

A bunch of raging teenagers can't be right.

that's pretty fucked up desu senpai

yeah ok

...

t. Failed freshman bio

Nice, the question was: is Veeky Forums the absolutely most cucked board in Veeky Forums?

And the answer has been a loud yes!

/thread

>cuck

Back to /pol/ you go

Yesssss, good sassenach!
A sack of potatoes has been deposited at your hovel

Out-of-Africa has been rescinded by its author. Try again.

WUZ

KANGZ

AND

QUEENZ

AND

SHEEEEEIT

>what is outbreeding depression

fucking kek

AND

>Humans become more diverse on interbreeding.
MAXIMUM TROLLING ACHIEVED

Yeah, dogs would be much more diverse and interesting if they were all one pool of interchangeable mutts. Nothing is lost by breeding wolfhounds with chihuahuas.

>It's one against Racialism
Whatever it's supposed to be for, it's a completely shit argument. You could as easily make a similar chart for the great apes (looking at common genetic information, the only plausible justification) and try to imply that no diversity is lost by the extinction of individual species within the group.

If you took precontact Asian, European, and (Sub-Saharan) African populations and kept them in isolation, they'd each produce no individuals resembling the typical examples of the others.