What is the most inspirational quote you've ever read in a book?

(Stoop) if you are abcedminded, to this claybook, what curios of sings (please stoop), in this allaphbed! Can you rede (since We and Thou had it out already) its world?

>Obama
>2004
Im gonna post this on pol and see how many falls for it.

That's not even the best Dawkins quote

>fall hard for le atheisme meme
>STILL consider appeals to moral as arguments
Wtf

...

Dick has emotions?

Feynman died in '88..

And, when you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.

>Atheists can't care about human life
Why doe?

>push hard for the "morality comes only from religion" meme
>STILL consider snide greentext as arguments
Wtf

Atheist here, the reason is time cops

It's this kind of thinking that shows how truly stupid religious people are.

Why care?
Because I like some people. God or not, life is the most anomalous and enigmatic thing for trillions of lightyears in any direction and the only thing moreso would be more life from elsewhere. Life is a great mystery. You don't have to play pretend you have the answers to it to enjoy it or feel empathy.

very high quality memeing right here

>mfw when he actually went out and did that

Firing a shot costs hella more energy than 5 calories. I dont know the exact amount of joules edged out by the gunpowder, but its over 5.

holy shit obama wasen't even born then

>shoot machine gun
>my body starts burning away
guns kill people guys, its scary

>only 5 atoms to fire a gun
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
t. /k/

calories are hella not the same thing as atoms

Josh Lyman?

That's why it is such a great and inspirational quote.

Oh look. It's a /lit thread for people who only read memes!

...

>being this gullible
H eh . . . he pulled ur strings, kids . . . .

>MUH FEELINGS

B E G U I L E D
E
G
U
I
L
E
D

...

black science man is reddit tier meme friend

...

underrated post

T.H.I.S. !

Empathy is for faggots.

>this pic
Is gender a spook?

I wouldn't be surprised if he actually said that.
I mean we're talking about a guy who did something like this.
youtube.com/watch?v=2tIwYNioDL8

What the fuck? How is there 61 thousand views on that video if there are only 8 thousand people alive?

Are you retarded? Clearly the people who have watched that video have watched it more than once. I mean it's obvious.

What the fuck.
It took time and effort to animate all that shit and make the song.

>creates memes
>becomes one

Circle of life, myan

underrated post

Dicky Dawkins is a twitter banter legend

Damn

Damn, respect

wtf i love dawkins now

He can't help himself!

Please be trolling, neither of you can possibly believe that qoute to be true

...

>Burns atoms
Wat?

The absolute madman

...

...

...

Woah.

I hope this is real

What's the name of that political phenomenon in which liberals publicize statements they consider outrageous, assuming everybody will share their indignation, but accidentally end up promoting the statements to people who otherwise wouldn't have heard them?

...

This is one of the most nonsensical things I've ever read

Not him but I'd like you to elaborate.

Also not him, but he's literally advocating reeducation camps.

Ever been on /pol/?

He argues that natural rights can be grasped by universally everyone, including the recognition of private property and the individual's supremacy over his own body. He argues that people whose ideologies clash with natural rights and private property (democracy, communism, socialism, etc.) should be looked down as intellectually challenged people who are devoid of any rights.

But I have read this quote and I believe this specific passage is when he is specifically referring to covenants whose nature is conservative (nuclear family, kin-oriented, etc.). He says that simple ostracism or contempt would be sufficient to make these degenerates go "back in the closet". The physical removal part only comes when they start to act militant.

>I have read this quote
I meant I have read this book.

To expand on this, he says the fact that private property owners would have the right to admit or exclude whomever they wanted from their property, it would be certainly in their interests to not only get rid of people who are universally reviled by society (con men, beggars, homeless, rude people, the unpleasant, gypsies, etc.) but also of people who are in fact a tangible threat to the libertarian order.

triggered

We still have a few months, I hope he doesn't let us down.