What the fuck did Kant actually look like? His various portraits seem to depict different people

What the fuck did Kant actually look like? His various portraits seem to depict different people.

Second from the left is my head canon Kant

First and third look a bit off, others look just like him

Really? The statue? I usually imagine second from the right, because that's the coolest image of him and it has stuck with me.

Oh yeah thats what I meant, got my directions all fucked

I don't remember, OP. It's been a few centuries since I last saw him.

jej

lol are you thomas pynchon? >trips

>5'0"

The first portait might not even be of him, but of F. H. Jacobi instead.

As for Kant's actual face...

...

...

So you're telling me we don't know what the-Kant-in-himself looked like?

...

...

...

wow where are the painters getting the weird protruding forehead from then? It looks like he had pretty normal bone structure.

And as for his skull...

What is this nightmare fuel?

...

...

His hairline/wigline, maybe - though Herder had this to say about his... *ahem* ... appearance:

"His broad forehead, built for thinking, was the seat of an imperturbable cheerfulness and joy."

You have to use your imagination.

Really? Nobody got there yet?

WAKE ME UP

big heada was sign of big intelligence back then

>such a footnote to Kant that his portraits even absorb yours as a footnote

SOMEONE CALL REINHOLD

Don't worry, it gets worse.