Was GG Allin the embodiment of Nietzschean Ubermensch who rejected any form of spookness?

Was GG Allin the embodiment of Nietzschean Ubermensch who rejected any form of spookness?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3F9yk8X1TAw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

isn't chasing some kinda dream of being a "rockanroll legend" very pathetic and not nietzschean at all?

Yeah if by rising above the herd and becoming an individual figure worthy of leadership you mean smearing your face with shit and being a heroin addict, then yes.

youtube.com/watch?v=3F9yk8X1TAw

also if you have watched the documentary about him it really becomes clear that he was a sad person. his drummer seemed like a cool guy though.

This is what happens when you go bald

The Ubermensch is a spook.

But it's no doubt that Stirner would've worshiped GG Allin.

He was the living manifestation of the whole scope of Nietzsche's ideas.

muh sarcasm

Jim Morrison was a rockstar legend and was as ubermensch as it got nigga.

I met gg twice and had to clean up the runny shits he left on the dressing room floor both times. His band was super tight in those early days. They somehow soldiered on through the beer bottle showers and other shenanigans. But gg himself was just a fuckin asshole in my experience.

No, and you could even make the case that he was what Nietzsche argued against. Nietzsche wrote about self-overcoming, of developing more power over yourself, not of relinquishing self-control and acting like an animal. GG Allin certainly went his own way in life (I assume that's why you're asking the question) but it wasn't a Nietzschean way.

No, the embodiment of orbitofrontal damage

>self-overcoming
For what purpose, though? God is dead.

>sheeple detected

For finding personal meaning and purpose in life in spite of the death of god you fuggin' pleb.

>implying smoking crack and eating own shit in public can't be a personal purpose of life

No, he was a talentless, filthy junkie who thought of himself that way.

No, he was a slave to his own addiction.

Typical burger imo.

>It is no doubt comforting to speak of ' the genius' as if impersonal creative energy were commensurable with the order of autonomous individuality governed by reason, but such chatter is, in the end, absurd. Genius is nothing like a character trait, it does not belong to a psychological lexicon; far more appropriate is the language of seismic upheaval, inundation, disease, the onslaught of raw energy
from without. One 'is' a genius only in the sense that one 'is' a syphilitic, in the sense that 'one' is violently problematized by a ferocious exteriority. One returns to
the subject of which genius has been predicated to find it charred and devastated beyond recognition.