It's 2017 and president Donald Trump has just moved into the white house...

Not in a bizarre fictional scenario, user, and humor is protected by law.

you find threatening a presidential candidate funny?!?

>tfw thought trump was just pandering to the masses during the rep debates, and that he was actually intelligent
>watch debate last night
>can't string a coherent sentence together and goes off on unrelated tangents because he obviously didn't prepare

That was the most embarrassing thing I've ever seen.

What happened to the US?

>thinking Trump was intelligent until debate

this is what happened to the US.

>what happened to the U.S.
Americans

I am an expert on humor, and I have been consulted by the Secret Service several times in the past. I can see that user's post was clearly joke.

The saddest thing is you don't even get the asphodel part, or the trolling would be more amusing.

Thank you. Sometimes one needs an expert to clarify these matters.

Have the media made a mockery of him yet and pointed out how embarrassing it was?

How do conservative media outlets spin this?

Previously the media kinda portrayed him as "offensive but kinda witty about it". Now he just looks incompetent

Will Trump change anything about sjw academic culture?

Just a curious yuropoor's inquiry.

yes, with the same magic wand he's going to build the wall and remove every muslim and illegal immigrant from the country with.

No he can't.
Also sjws are not the number one problem in europe right now. The exact opposite is.

No because interfering that directly in education is outside a president's remit and fairly directly contrary to a conservative worldview even if they don't like it.

Also "sjw academic culture" is mostly a bogyman and the few angry articles which will be posted in response to that will only really convince those that are sure it exists.

>the exact opposite is
Muslims?

>He hasn't read Dostoevsky.

Trump make a dogwhistle for the NRA to kill Hillary, all bets are off

>SJW in academia is a boogeyman

Why are there too many books? Why does he want to burn them? I'm so confused.

Populist right.
Yeah and islam extremists. It's the same.

Yeah remember all those rapes the evil UKIP voters committed? Oh wait.

Too much intellectualism is not good for any society. Also most books are liberal.

Because he's the orange Hitler

Who cares about rapes? Are you a feminist?
Yeah rapes by white people exist. And there are a ton.

What are you doing in this board?

>rape boogeyman

rightists and their limited worldviews

>who cares about rapes?
Decent human beings
>Yeah rapes by white people exist
Conveniently ignoring the fact that MENA immigrants/refugees are committing disproportionate amounts of rape enabled by a retrograde culture, and also having to resort to mentioning "whites" for rape when the initial comparison you drew was between the populist right and muslims. Poor show.

All of them so that I finally have an excuse not to read.

Thanks, it means more when you say it. People would just call me a paranoid shill. LOL

So I made threads about Nazism and mods ban me, but OP makes a blatant bait thread with no literature repercussion and yet mods do nothing.

If I make a thread about what books are suitable for smashing it on feminist faces will it be still up or not?

DOUBLE STANDARDS, RIGGED SYSTEM. LYIN MODS.

eat shit lol retard

First off, did you report this thread? Secondly, post the thread you got banned for.

nice

nytimes.com/2014/11/02/world/in-torrent-of-rapes-in-britain-an-uncomfortable-focus-on-race-and-ethnicity.html?_r=1

>"Shabir Ahmed, a delivery driver for two takeout places, did not have to go looking for young girls. Runaways and rebellious teenagers would show up at the restaurants, often hungry and cold. He slipped them free drinks and chicken tikka masala. “Call me Daddy,” he would say."
did Pynchon write this?

We've crossed over into a parallel universe and are actually living in a Pynchon novel.

If the populist right really did take over Islamic extremists wouldn't be in Europe. Immigration is roundly supported by the left, who are for the most part too afraid of being xenophobic to think critically about the issue. Right wingers are often retards, yes, but as long as they restrict the size of the government to make more people starve they're probably doing more good than harm.

naked lunch
bloodmeridian
hyperion
perdido street station
the recognitions
anything from Faulkner
all YA books
any books about or written by homosex
all fantasy
all Sci fi
finnegans wake

He's right though.

I would tell Mr. Trump to start by reading The Republic by Plato, one of the greatest Greek philosophers, in which a similar topic is discussed.

Paranoid dummy. He would never do that.

see me in the parking lot for street fighter six

He looks like he's struggling to take a shit on the pot. I think the Donald has hemorrhoids.

>an intellectual, but downplays it lest he scare off the anti-intellectual working class voters
>a political genius, has obviously studied political philosophy from Plato to Machiavelli
>wrote and published several bestselling masterpieces, while Hillary just gets her low brow propaganda ghostwritten

Is he, dare I say it, our man?

I would argue that, because of SJW's, in this day and age, a rape can be anything from an unwanted stroke to the extreme images we have always had of it. I can't help but think that most cases of rape that spwaned from the rise of immigrants are merely unwanted behaviour that has been commited due to the unkown lowering of these critea by the immigrants from a different land.
Sure many extreme situations may also have occured but how many of the reports were just some refugee trying to hold a pretty girls hand as she walked by?

>>an intellectual, but downplays it lest he scare off the anti-intellectual working class voters
>>a political genius, has obviously studied political philosophy from Plato to Machiavelli

Maybe he should have used that knowledge in the recent debate because he was BTFO'd and struggled to even say anything coherent.

You realize he was pandering to the masses, right? Most normal people says he won the debate.

This was a deplorable event, but if you had actually been in Britain at the time you'd know that this was not due to the recent immigration crisis - but was by a group of people that had lived there most of their lives. It was also not a case of foreigners raping whites but of them raping their own people (mostly) as they sought refuge from their own country.

Everything written in 1900 or later
A few masterpieces will be lost, but something has to be done.

>a rape can be anything from an unwanted stroke
>most cases of rape that spwaned from the rise of immigrants are merely unwanted behaviour
In Sweden this actually holds a grain of truth, but in most European countries this is simply not the case. You're not getting slapped with a rape charge unless you're forcing your dick into some sort of orifice.
> but if you had actually been in Britain at the time
I've lived in Britain my entire life
>but was by a group of people that had lived there most of their lives
It was by members of a community that comprised both people born in Britain and recent immigrants.
>It was not a case of foreigners raping whites
It was absolutely a case of immigrants (and their descendants) raping whites. Whites were disproportionately the victims in Rotherham.

Why ask me? Can't he read the preview on cuckipedia by himself and decide?

>BTFO'd
He clearly wasn't, got weak near the end but to get BTFO you need an opponent who is semi-decent, Hillary isn't one to blow anyone out.

nah they're the solution

>I would argue that, because of SJW's, in this day and age, a rape can be anything from an unwanted stroke to the extreme images
Please cite evidence idiot.

>Libs still getting triggered because of Bible

>implying libs agree with the bible

even /pol/ thinks he performed poorly and that's really saying something

I don't think anyone could watch the first half of that ''debate'' and say Trump was worse than Hillary, I don't care much how other people look at it.
The second half was bad, mostly because of the questions which were more aimed at Trump than Hillary, but he could have handled it better, I'd give him a 5/0 overall.
Not BTFO like some claim

>bragging about tax evasion
He fucked up lad. This coming from someone who hates Hillary.

>I don't think anyone could watch the first half of that ''debate'' and say Trump was worse than Hillary
Well, you've got that wrong. Try asking other people.

>This coming from someone who hates Hillary.
wow good for you you're so smart and shit

>He fucked up lad.
Thanks for the analysis lad.
I'll take it at face value because we both hate Hillary.

>Well, you've got that wrong.
>Try asking other people.
>when you get something wrong, just ask other people -- other people never get anything wrong.

At least not if they hate Hillary. That's, like, axiomatically impossible. For them to be wrong, that is. Since they hate Hillary and that makes them very smart sincemy Mom also hates Hillary and she's, like, the smartest person I know.

I might be an outlier but I see tax evasion as a failure of the state, not the business man exploiting it.
They're businessmen, they live for shit like that, to expect otherwise is living in a fantasy land.
I did, they agreed with me.

>when you get something wrong, just ask other people -- other people never get anything wrong.
Try reading the words. The comment I responded to started "I don't think anyone could watch and say" and was in that sense bullshit. Obvious bullshit, as many many people and news outlets did say Trump was worse than Hillary. Check Google, dumb ass. Whether they got it "objectively wrong" is a completely separate issue.
But hey, thanks for reminding me again how blissfully stupid Trump-backers are.

>and was in that sense bullshit
Oh look, someone who takes a sentence like that literally
I was also talking about the first half of the debate, not the entire debate as a whole.
You missed a lot for someone who took a post THAT literally, dumber than the trump backer maybe. pathetic!

>But hey, thanks for reminding me again how blissfully stupid Trump-backers are.
Well, achkchually, I can tell you with certainty that I have never said that I was backing Trump. I like to call those people Trumped-backing trickle-downing voters.

>Check Google, dumb ass.
And by the way, also check my website, because you can also find some testimonies there about people thinking Trump was being way... *smile and pause* less accurate during the debate.

Hes even more pro censorship than sjws. He goes around trying to sue people for jokes, saying hell open up the libel laws and blacklists any media outlet from his events that doesnt write positively enough of him. He lets white supremecist talk shows in his rallies but bans the washington post

So you cite one single instance? Cant you see how youre starting from a conclusion? As if i cant find an instance of white people raping and getting away with it

You obviously just want to believe that. Its a known fact tony schwartz erote art of the deal and is on record saying trump used the techniques he taught him to manipulate people. He read schwartz not machievelli. Hes an average dunce with a huge inheretence who pretends to be a blubbering idiot whos self made

Factually incorrect, read the numbers and leave your echo chamber

>Trump wants to burn books because "there are too many of them in America"
>tfw this sounds like something he would actually do

His biography, since he just makes up what he's done in the past anyway.