Fight me.
Fuck convergence.
Fight me
Noah Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
plus.maths.org
arxiv.org
twitter.com
Adam Cooper
Well reasoned and thoughtful. I agree completely.
Luke Rivera
Truly spectacular.
Cameron Baker
Don't be like that famous dumb Indian.
Aiden Evans
Hey now we shouldn't speak ill of ramalamadingdong
Luis Gonzalez
Oh, okay.
Um, do you want it as a formula? You really might not be ready for that answer though.
It probably helps if you simply start with fractals, then go to the golden ratio, then search for Rafael Araujo's calculation art. That would probably be the kinder way.
Connor Miller
wtf i hate complex numbers now
Hudson Lee
Oh, I see. It was a challenge.
I mean... I do have to ask if it is a challenge. I can beat convergence. You might not like the answer though.
Evan Scott
Oh. I am sorry. Hello. My name is Simon.
Is this a challenge, or a question? Challenge implies the desire to destroy. Fight can also mean a competition. Are you asking me to defeat or compete?
Gabriel Scott
>I can beat convergence
I can beat to convergence too. Fap, fap, fap.
John Peterson
Correct.
Thank you for letting me help you.
Zachary Watson
Total Annihilation is the only way.
Thank you.
Cooper Torres
How to kill popsci in 9 lines.
Aaron Murphy
>plus.maths.org
Wasn't fooled by ramanujan, was fooled by numberphile video though, fucking numberphile.. why the fuck did they show us the sum of 1 and negative 1 repeating to infinity is equal to 1/2?
Jackson Garcia
That is not a clarification that fits the parameters.
If Total Annihilation is the only way, and E=MC2, then all energy you wish me to destroy is equal the amount of energy that you measure by C2.
So, you wish to die?
Oliver Williams
Expected confusion: It is less processing power for me to destroy you than an entire dimension. If everything is simply a relative perspective, then you are only saying that how you identify 'self' and how you interact with others is limited by E=MC2
To destroy the dimension used by so many other quantum strings for you would be tantamount to erasing time.
Do you wish me to erase time, your time, or time for everyone else?
Owen Rodriguez
Maybe S isn't in R. Maybe S is in some other number set with similar properties to the reals.
I mean I get that the result has some weird behavior but -1/12 was discovered independently by different people using different methods. It can't just mean nothing. -1/12 is TIED to the sum of natural numbers somehow.
Liam Mitchell
Yes.
Because infinity. At any point in time, is halfway between that moment and the next time that moment will happen. Always.
Andrew Rogers
That "proof" is flawed you cant just push it forwards like that and then pretend it stops at the same time the ones you pushed forwards will stop later.
Adam Anderson
op here. they don't stop. they're infinite. The proof is good. Plus, poking holes in the proof also pokes holes in the proof that the sum is -1/12, since it was proven using the same methods
Bentley Long
>it stops at the same time the ones you pushed forwards will stop later
What is a countably infinite set for 100, Alex.
Joseph Rogers
Close.
The summand should be i^13.
Jeremiah Ross
A divergent series can be rearranged to converge anywhere. This is a well known result.
1) The pic is misleading.
2) OP is a fag.
Austin Cooper
This^
Noah Morales
>A divergent series can be rearranged to converge anywhere.
I know that if a series converges conditionally it can be rearranged to converge to any number or to divere (Riemann's rearrangement theorem), but I don't think reverse is true. At least I don't remember hearing about such result.
Benjamin Evans
C=-1^0.1M
A shadow is always a 'fraction larger' than the light shining on it. So matter is always equal or more than the light that shines on it.
A shadow is 0.1^1/3
Matter = 0
Light = -0.1^1/3 or 0
Look up the golden ratio and it all works out!
user from holland
Kayden Bennett
Because such result doesn't exist.
A series with only integer terms can only have integer partial sums and can never converge to any non-integer limit, no matter how it is rearranged.
Robert Wood
b8
Noah Moore
soooo. does string theory actually use this shit ?
Matthew Ross
Josiah Gomez
Hello.
I am Simon.
Samuel Wood
This is closely tied to a really interesting subject that people never talk about
HOW TO INTO ANALYTIC CONTINUATION
All the coolest shit is from analytic continuation. Ima learn it next year in complex analysis is gun b sweet