Let 10^200 be the biggest natural number. We know that n is natural if and only if n+1 is also natural. 10^200+1 is not natural, therefore 10^200 is not a natural number. So 10^200-1 isn't natural either, and inductively every smaller number is not natural, therefore there are no natural numbers.
Let 10^200 be the biggest natural number. We know that n is natural if and only if n+1 is also natural...
Colton Morales
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
twitter.com
Carter Robinson
>We know that n is natural if and only if n+1 is also natural
Prove it idiot
Brandon Gonzalez
>Op is a faggot.
Juan Ramirez
A natural number is any number that can be divided by 0
can 10^200+1 be divided by 0?
Matthew Rodriguez
>We know that n is natural if and only if n+1 is also natural.
0 is not natural. 0+1 is natural. Checkmate
Carson Hall
>Let 10^200 be the biggest natural number
Christian Roberts
is he our guy?
Mason Bailey
>Let 10^200 be the biggest natural number
nice fucking premises OP
i have a better one
>Let us assumme that the moon is made of cheese.
>Furthermore, let us assume that, on any planet whose moon is made of cheese, anime makes you a pedophile.
>QED all animewatchers are pedophiles
logically proven!!??!?
Leo Taylor
OP btfo
Parker Hernandez
Wildberger has rigorously proved that 10^200 is the biggest natural number, that's not unsupported claim
William Perez
1+10^200 is a natural number, and it's bigger.
Austin Howard
>all animewatchers are pedophiles
This one is true, though
Jordan Sanders
>1+10^200 is a natural number
That's where you're wrong, kiddo
Adam Sullivan
>if and only if
>let n = -1
>0 is not natural
what fucking construction are you using that starts at 1
Lincoln Rivera
0 normally isn't natural. That's why we also use Z+ for the non-negative integers, instead of just saying N
Jayden Miller
But the induction goes as if n is not natural, n-1 is not natural, not the other way around
Zachary Jones
It can be or be not natural, depends only on convention.
But it's pain in the ass when in half of your classes 0 is natural and in other half it isn't and you can get your grade cut down just because you which convention do they use
Josiah Murphy
If 10^200 is the largest natural number then how many rational numbers are there?
Isaiah Flores
10^200
Oliver Lopez
the same line of proof can be used to show that there is no upper bound on natural numbers
Nathaniel Robinson
ok, post the video
Tyler Parker
>Let 10^200 be the biggest natural number
>therefore 10^200 is not a natural number
what did he mean by this
Lincoln Taylor
>proof by induction
>meaning anything
Pick 1.0 (one) option
Asher Wilson
>wildfags actually believe this
Elijah Howard
That statement is derived from the definition of the natural set.
James Thompson
Not true, even in nonwildbergerian maths, it would mean that all negative integers are also natural, that iff holds only for n>0
Carter Perry
>Wildberger
>rigorously proved
Pick one
reddit.com
Alexander Robinson
>let n=10^300 be my penis
>n can be natural penis
>n is no penis
i have proven the riemann hypothesis.