Light has mass

Light has mass

Other urls found in this thread:

physics.stackexchange.com/questions/1898/do-photons-gain-mass-when-they-travel-through-glass
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Sure thing, OP.

If light has mass then why can't I slow it down?

Because infinite inertia maybe?

Look up "slow light".
Also, see physics.stackexchange.com/questions/1898/do-photons-gain-mass-when-they-travel-through-glass

I am sure that violates the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics.

I thought this was common knowledge

There are some linguistic strawman arguements I could throw at you but I'm tired and am now going to sleep.

Photons are just the 3-dimensional cross-sections of 4th dimensional fish protruding into our lower dimension.

Of course photons have mass otherwise the EMdrive wouldn't work

If light has no mass then why do photons have momentum?

BUT
Do they have a gravitational pull.

Because they have infinite velocity
[eqn]\dfrac{\text{momentum of light}}{\text{infinite velocity}}=0 \text{ mass}[/eqn]
QED

You idiot, you can. That's why scientists are currently trying to raise the speed of light so we can get around the Universe faster.

im dying of cringe, because the memeing is too much. its. really. too. much.

Fucking plebs.

E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 from special relativity.

If m = 0, then E = pc for massless particles. p=mv is Newtonian bullshit.

Photons don't have mass because they necessarily travel at the speed of light so you can never get into their rest frame.

Yeah, no.

Light is a coaxial longitudinal circuit with a rate of induction.

Photons do not exist.

Light does not "travel" "through" anything at any "speed".

Light sources do not emit anything. They are field perturbations.

And your garbage is Einsteinian bullshit.

Does nobody here read Tesla???

Does nobody here follow Eric Dollard???

you know that, while it has no mass as a motionless particle, light has mass because it has energy . it cannot be a motionless particle. it is travelling with fucking c

Now explain how the light "speeds up" once it passes through the glass.

I'll wait.

There are no particles.

Everything is fields, and fields are not particles.

Light does not "travel" anywhere at any "speed". It has a rate of induction.

>Einsteinian bullshit

>einsteinian bullshit

W E W
E
W

"photons do not exist"
photoelectric effect--> light is a particle and a wave
yes it is a perturbation in the electromagnetic field. but the wave travels tghrought space at the speed of light, which follows from the maxwell equations.

well, what is it with the particle wave dualism then ?

Not everything with energy has mass you sperg, everything with energy has either mass or momentum. Light has momentum, no mass. That's what the fucking equation says.

lad...

gravity doesnt care. gravity sees the energy of the light as mass.

...

NO IT DOESNT IT SEES THE STRESS-ENERGY TENSOR WHICH DEPENDS ON THE MOMENTUM 4-VECTOR WHICH HAS NO MENTION OF MASS YOU FUCKING RETARD.

ok thanks.
youre a geek, thought. i didnt calculate this yet...

Everything just follows a null geodesic, it has nothing to do with mass, just the shortest distance in curved spacetime.

and youre really kinda agressive.

>Does nobody here read Tesla???
Only for the keks m8

It doesn't

Einstein gave you NOTHING.

Tesla gave you EVERYTHING.

A wave is not something.

A wave is what something does.

My hand is waving to you right now. Is my hand a wave?

Or is my hand waving?

there are no particles; everything is a field and fields are not particles

see above

Yes?

It is indeed something to think about.

kek

Read an experiment for once in your life.

>The speed of light is diminished after it goes through glass! I swear!

kek

You understand NOTHING
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect

Dude, you just #rekt yourself. You're literally that D-K victim.

Light from stars bend around other forms of mass, that is why they are visible.

End of thread.

Did you even read your link? Quasiparticles aren't real things, they're models that make the physics easier.

On second thought, don't waste your time reading books, nigger
You're beyond saving
Your only hope is that in your infinite brilliance you actually manage to prove the things you think you understand

What is the mass of light?

500 grams per photon.

Aye, brought to us by the Cult of Small Things Bumping Together.

I don't even understand it myself.

I just know it to be true.

Good an answer as any, considering that "photons" don't exist.

Bullshit.

Go out in space and try to see them without having anything between your eyes and them.

Guess what you see from space with your naked eye when you look at the sun?

Why, nothing, of course. But you are still blinded.

>500 grams
two photons are a fucking kilo? you think light is as fat as americans?

>infinite velocity
translation: we don't know the exact velocity value but it's very high

Checkmate physicians

Remove the observer

You're just changing definitions around. You aren't clever it's just fucking semantics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation

Photons do exist namely because you named it.

The shape of a photon is a star tetrahedron. Set your jimmies to rustled. Brought to you by a 4 dimensional being. Also don't turn around right now.