Can you prove to me that Gravity isn't just density?

Can you prove to me that Gravity isn't just density?

youtube.com/watch?v=Gg2URbkJo18&feature=youtu.be&t=1m31s

Gravity has little to do with density

What does a force have to do with mass per volume?

The point is, this "force" does not exist.
It can not be seen, felt or measured.

Things fall because they are denser than air.

how do planets orbit the sun?

But it is density, mass density + energy density.

gravity isn't a force it's bending of space-time

>felt or measured.
Are you telling me when I jump up then come down that I cannot feel or measure that force?

What did he mean by this?

Even with this abstract explanation, you could say his model is correct if you assume there is different space densities due to the pressures caused by spacial torsions

>Things fall because they are denser than air.
Why do denser things fall?
>inb4 gravity

Maybe take a physics class before you start making theories. Or better yet, get a Phd.

>Can you prove to me that Gravity isn't just density?

I imagine both "models" for Reality can exist, but you'll have to do all the work on the density theory.
It's not as if math or physics are realistic or that accurate; most of their numbers are nonsense.

Can you prove to me that oranges aren't orange colored apples?

yes very easily, so what?

...

If gravity is just density than why do things still fall in vacuum chambers? Also, what exactly is the reason that more dense things go down? Some sort of magical force that just makes heavy things fall? aka gravity

you can start by touching their outer peel. they're different
now prove the OP

could just be a rough apple

no because oranges have a rind apples don't

some apples have thicker skins than others

it's still not a rind

re your first question the answer I've heard is that nothing has no mass so its density is 0.

re your second no idea what they explain, all I've haerd is "ITS DENSITY THE MASS PER UNIT VOLUME IS THE REASON" but that makes no sense

can you prove that a rind is not just a thick apple skin?

proof?

Yes. If it was an apple skin it would be on an apple and not an orange

...

sounds tautological