Is the sentence grammatically correct in the picture?

Hearty keks, thank you user.

For sale. A female.
Never driven.

if you're a woman driver

if you're a woman and you drive

if you're a woman who drives

kek

btw that's not a sentence

1) wrong
2) correct (why can't one use if?)
3) correct

Nice troll, buddy :P

>if you're a woman driver
If you are a woman driver.
( you didn't have a verb )

>if you're a woman and you drive
If you're
a) a woman
and
b)you drive.
(disambiguation)
>if you're a woman who drives
If you're a woman whom drives.
(woman is in the accusative case, so whom is correct instead of nominative "who")

if sets it up as a dependent clause.

2nd on is right (but weird)

not if you capitalize the second " IF. "

>(woman is in the accusative case, so whom is correct instead of nominative "who")
Hahaha WHAT THE FUCK Veeky Forums?

i think it's again doing an epic "bad grammar advice" troll

>if sets it up as a dependent clause
So?

You have to enclose if with commas because its a parenthetical
If you're a female and, if, you drive

If you're a female and only if, you drive.

So standalone dependent clauses aren't grammatically correct.

If the second if is parenthetical the first if must also be parenthetical though...
,If, you're a female and, if, you drive.

Tell me the correct one.

you can't do verb phrase ellipsis with complementizers

The greentexted second one was correct but ambiguous. All non-greentexted examples are corrected, AND correct.

No? Then how do you explain these?
>I don't know whether
>He doesn't know if
>It's known that
>It's easy for

>So standalone dependent clauses aren't grammatically correct.

So would this be correct?:
If you are a female, and if you text "heyoo,"

The construction is not a complete sentence. It is, as points out, a dependent clause. Specifically, an 'if' clause is called a protasis, and it needs to modify an apodosis (a 'then' clause) to make a complete sentence.

Aside from that, 'you're' is correct. There should be a comma after 'and' though, and there would be one after 'drive' linking the clause to the apodosis. (If 'and' were omitted, the commas would be optional, but the latter one in particular would still be a good idea.)

only if you capitalize AND. There should be double spacing around " heyoo " too.

Now it isn't standalone though. . .

>The construction is not a complete sentence.
If it was to be like this then would it be right?

>protasis
>apodosis
whoa why are you talking about theater when this thread is about grammaticality?

We just can't get to the bottom of this OP, you're on your own.

Pic related is perfect.

What's your stance on "heh"

A semi-cynical connotation. "hehe" or "hehehehe" is absolute gay, though.

How would Hemingway laugh through text? What emojis are acceptable to you?

We are not amused.

*I am not amused.
:^)

Like a man. That's "hahaha."

Correct.

Now, is this grammatically correct?

It's a sentence fragment.

Is this # grammatically correct, user?

Whether you are a female... (and whether you drive).

It's a grammatically correct piece of a sentence

Holy... I want more

Is this a correct sentence:
>Why Veeky Forums so easy to bait

>if female && drive(

is the correct

No it's

>If you're female and you know it, clap your hands
>If you're driving and you know it, clap your hands

>programming
>getting to interact with females

lol

It's a sentence fragment and it's grammatical when used to answer a question.

Bump.

remove the second IF and it should be correct

>not knowing the royal we
The world has gone to shit

This is correct, right Veeky Forums?

This.

Is this correct? Hello?

Of fucking coarse,.

THERE'S NO FUCKING SUBJECT + VERB, FUCK

What do you mean?

Complete sentences require a subject and a verb, if the verb is intransitive. If the verb is trasitive, it's subject + verb + object.

OP's pic is a dependent clause, meaning, "If you're a female and if you drive..." uhhh, then fucking what?

yes, without the propositions

Holy..................

but there are two sentences in the example, each with their own subject and verb phrase.
[NP you][VP are a female]
[NP you][VP drive]

NEITHER ARE FUCKING SENTENCES

THEY'RE DEPENDENT CLAUSES

ARE YOU FUCKING WITH ME

YOU BETTER BE FUCKING WITH ME

Not him, but they are both independent clauses separated by a coordinating conjunction.
[if you are a female] and [if you drive]

What's all this horse shit about the whole sentence being a dependent clause, it's two independent clauses, end of story.

Holy fucking shit, are you really that fucking retarded?

If that is a nice rebuttal, and if you are a cock sandwich...

"If you are a female" is not an independent clause. Independent means it stands on its own. "If" is a goddamn conjunction. It has to connect to something.

What is your reasoning behind which that is an independent clause?

I got over prescriptivism years ago, so why the fuck is this shit triggering me so hard?

It's independant because it stands by itself you fucking idiot.
Are you a fucking homo?
If you are .
Notice how the sentence stands alone in that context despite the conjunction? That's called being an independent clause, you pseud. Now fuck off back to whatever board you came from and leave the real men to discuss literature and grammar.

IF

FUCKING """"IF""""

HOW THE FUCK DOES THAT STAND ON ITS OWN

JESUS CHRIST

see for an example of how it stands on it's own. Do you even grammar?

Holy shit, I've been bamboozled.

This is payback for how I've been trolling /x/.

>mfw i deserve this

>if you drive
assuming it's referring to a Tesla model S it's not right,

This thread has devolved (of course it has) into trolling

It's long since been answered

Let it die

holy......