Why does society denounce/shun pedophilia when it is the norm for every man on earth to be attracted to younger woman?

why does society denounce/shun pedophilia when it is the norm for every man on earth to be attracted to younger woman?

One norms against pedophilia were adopted at about the time that populations were growing dramatically, and lower fertility from older pregnancies was not a problem.

Two, the rate of pregnancy complications is pretty high for young women in the first couple years after they start their periods.

Three, many countries allow younger consent if the man is close in the age to the woman. If richer older men were monopolizing younger women, it could have negative consequences for social stability. (Young unmarried men tend to learn to shoot guns and then cause trouble. For examples, see: all of human history)

>it's denounced/shunned
>it's the norm
pick one

Masturbating is the norm, but it still carries a social stigma.

only in cults

publicly what carries stigma is talking about masturbation, not doing it

I'm pretty sure that masturbating in public also carries a stigma...just sayin

because the litmus test for right / wrong is not whether it is instinctive.

same deal then; it's not the act, it's the time and place

The powers that be have been trying to control who the common man is/isn't allowed to have sex with since the beginning of civilization. Controlling who someone is allowed to have sex with is just another form of controlling the population.

Modern day stigma against pedophilia is no different from christian rulers creating stigma against premarital sex, or the muslims forcing all females to wear hijabs in public.

Meanwhile behind closed doors, those that are in power have all kinds of freaky kinky sex.

Media seek sensation and child abuse is pretty shocking topic.
They misuse word pedophile for child abuser, making it sound so negative, that it's practically impossible to use it in objective context in western society.

>t. ancap

I've always found it so weird how pedophiles can't understand that most people do not find young girls sexually attractive at all.

Tell that to /a/ and /pol/.

because a child cannot consent to sex, so you're just raping a child if you have sex with them.

why was childrape okay for 99% of human history, but murder has been okay for 0% of human history?

>why was childrape okay for 99% of human history,
It wasn't, you dickhead. It caused physical trauma to the underdeveloped girls and they sure didn't appreciate being made to reproduce with old men.

You can still witness such trauma in any Muslim country.

it was legal and culturally acceptable

Not everywhere, not all the time, and like with a lot of bronze age beliefs, it was poorly justified and lacked logic.

>bronze age beliefs
try neolithic to early modern

Dumb nonetheless.

i just tell myself that people who think this havent/arent around children much.

Its easy to forget that when you were 1-6 it was really really really really really easy for someone older than you to completely fool you. And even from 6-12 it's easy. And from 12-18 it's harder but it still happens.

Thinking these people have enough experience to consent is retarded.

>believing our ethics du jour is an ideal universal ethics that can be applied to all times and places
>not being a brainlet

pick one and only one

>norm for every man on earth to be attracted to younger FURTILE woman

Op confirmed sick fuck attracted to pre-pubescent children

>back to /pol

You don't need to have sex with children to be a pedophile.

>/pol/ is pro pedophilia

actually some of them believe girls should be married at 13 years old...

Nowadays it's less apparent due their crusade against Islam but I remember threads on that 3-4 years ago

Speak for yourself faggot. I'm 25 and I wouldn't touch a woman younger than 22.

/pol/ is a non white pro trap board which is starting to also like pedo stuff, it's hard to get when they are larping and when serious tho

That's not true. Women prefer men in their 40's, while men women in their 30's.

Maybe men in their 50s do
Hebephilia is natural, attraction to prepubescent girls isn't

We would.

Sincerely
Everybody

i tried this a few times: show a girl that looks above 20 but is actually 15 or something. most people turn from "woah hot" to "ew disgusting". why are people so brainwashed in thinking an arbitrarily decided number can make legit or unlegit to fuck someone?

>Dimorphic fallacy

Why not?

"cannot consent" is kind of a meme. The argument goes that underage people cannot fully understand the ramifications of sex, but neither can anyone of any age.

Lots of underage people understand that sex might lead to pregnancy or disease, and lots of adults failed sex ed themselves.

Please explain how to determine whether a person is "capable of consent", without simply drawing a cutoff at some arbitrary age.

we dont live in a perfect world, you cant decide a point that works for everyone, someone is smart at 4yo and someone else will still be stupid in his 50s. what you cant do is decide an arbitrary cutoff that kinda saves the biggest amount of people, usually kids are not too brilliant on average and usually adults can decide for their future.
if a smaller % of them do the opposite you cant blame that on the majority
i agree that it sucks tho

By definition, you could convince people to adapt to a new one though.
>example: cash me ousside girl
It's because of societal implications-in particular, news media-and people's innate desire to conform and be accepted.

The real question is why and how it started

I've thought about this.
Age of consent should be 14 or 15 except for extenuating circumstances, should account for physical and emotional trauma, and the"victim" should have the right to free the "predator" once she reaches the age of consent.

It's a basic summary of my beliefs, and I realize it's simple enough to cause problems on a complicated subject.

since when humans gathered i guess. that's probably istinctive behaviour to help the group to survive. in a not harsh environment it leads to those sorts of deviations

Sure, assigning a cutoff is the most practical approach. I'm just saying that we should stop trying to say they "can't consent" and we should stop using the word "rape" for it.

It goes against common sense. You have slutty 15 year old girls lying about their age so older men will fuck them. You also have 14 year old boys who are literally raping people forcefully and yet the law says the rapist "can't consent" to sex.

law is often imperfect, i dont deny that, being a mix of arbitrary rules that interact with each other in a complex way
if someone doesnt think it too much it's probably a normal reaction to call rape and shiet
weird ass world we live in

It's very imperfect, and the "cant consent" meme is ridiculous.

In Arizona, a 17 year old having sex with a 14 year old is a sexual predator. That same 17 year old having sex with a 20 year old is a victim. So he "can consent" sometimes (and be subjected to awful legal troubles as a result of his actions) but only depending on the age of the sex partner?! Fucking dumb

Im from Italy, here rape is not much of a political argument so i cant say there are similar situations. Heard of many whores larping as rape victims and ruining other lifes, they got the truth out later but damage was already irreparable.
Your law sounds quite troublesome indeed.

You are wrong. The most desired age for porn actress is 18-20. And because it's illegal to hire younger actress, it's probable that younger girls are also desired.