What if he lived longer?
What if he lived longer?
...
he would be an old man
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ... = 1
We would have more numberphile videos on why 5687347922378933 is a special number
He'd work on a universal proof of pooing in loo.
unironically neck yourself
Come on, that was pretty funny.
he would die older
Riemann hypothesis would have been solved.
Better question. What if Galois didn't die duelling?
He would find the final solution
He would complete post-anabelian froeboid geometrics
less brainpower than ramanujan t.b.h
what if euler died early?
nothing, he was a brainlet
Nothing, he wasn't brilliant mathematician like Galois, Grothendieck or Memezuki, he just made up couple of gimmicky formulae and nowadays would be pretty much Neil degrade Tyson of maths
>he just made up couple of gimmicky formulae
this
rofl
this guy couldn't carry out a proof for shit
he just adopted the easy-peasy physicist point of view where everything has to converge (which resulted in a lot of wrong results)
also a majority of his results were gotten through empirical means, that's why we never get to see the "proofs", and that also explains his maths goddess bullshit.
tl;dr he was a brainlet.
>find difficult function
>differentiate
>get another difficult function
>bamboozle ppl into thinking ur a maths god xd
I'm pretty sure I could have beaten his ass in a battle of minds by the time I finished classes prépa and integrated ens ulm (people there are gods)
>tl;dr he was a brainlet.
t. brainlet
1+ S= 1+ (1-1+1-1+1-...)
1+ (1-1+1-1+1-....)= S
therefore:
1+ S= S
1= S- S
1= 0
Whats my obvious mistake?
1+ [(1-1)+1-1+1-1+1...] = either 1 or 2 depending on where you stop so not S....
This is bait but still.
No, he would be like rayman - an interesting quirk, but someone without any imagination to create.