well Veeky Forums?
Well Veeky Forums?
Brandon Wright
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
planning.e-psychometrics.com
twitter.com
Thomas Ward
Literally any number
Parker Cruz
Angel Richardson
Sequences have infinitely many elements. Polynomials can only have finitely many roots. Lagrange polynomials are irrelevant, but the determination of the sequence's next element is completely arbitrary.
Benjamin James
Yea okay, I get your point I guess. I gave up though.
You can test your further knowledge here, if you're interested.
planning.e-psychometrics.com
Jacob Wood
Take any odd position value from the sequence and its successor will have all the digits multiplied by three and summed at the same positions.
Not sure how these pairs are related to each other.
Brayden Ward
Oh, the difference between odd position value and its successor is always 32.
The next values are 978+32=1010 and 3030.
Robert Rodriguez
>Sequences have infinitely many elements.
[citation needed]
>Polynomials can only have finitely many roots
[citation needed]
Samuel Hall
...
Christian Stewart
>Lagrange polynomials are irrelevant
wrong because they're a tool that allows for the sequence to be extended arbitrarily
Adrian Brooks
Wow yea. Nicely spotted.
Christian King
I'm not going to cite basic math knowledge; being on Veeky Forums, you are familiar with basic math terms and their definitions, aren't you?
No, Lagrange polynomials are used for constructing polynomials for the purpose of interpolating a finite set of points; they aren't used for extrapolation, which is what you proposed they be used for. If you were insinuating that for every sequence there exists a polynomial whose roots are defined by that sequence, you'd be wrong.
Ethan Richardson
>I'm not going to cite basic math knowledge; being on Veeky Forums, you are familiar with basic math terms and their definitions, aren't you?
i have a degree in it so i'd hope so. are you sure you're familiar?
i'll wait for you to find these citations
Nicholas Perez
>they aren't used for extrapolation, which is what you proposed they be used for.
wrong because polynomials have larger domains than just the finitely many points you're interpolating
Samuel Brown
>Sweating intensifies
How could I forget about the trivial polynomial
How could I think a sequence couldn't be finite
Looks like your degree is worth more than mine
Jaxson Moore
>How could I think a sequence couldn't be finite
this is what i was wondering. what book or class did you see such a definition in?
Aaron Bell
-1/12
Julian Smith
I don't think sequences are infinite unless explicitly stated so
Luis Sanders
dont bother correcting him, his degree lets him redefine mathematical terms and make absurd claims
Oliver Butler
1010 and 3030
Mason Wood
22*3 = 66
66+32 = 98
98*3 = 294
294+32 = 326
326*3 = 978
978+32 = 1010
1010*3 = 3030