How advanced would we be now if the dark ages didn't exist?

How advanced would we be now if the dark ages didn't exist?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale
youtube.com/watch?v=Cqzq01i2O3U
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>People still unironically post this graph.

Either give me the units of "scientific advancement" or kill yourself.

The dark ages must exist for they shown our mistakes, and we as a species have learned from them. We cannot advance without first making the mistake.

Here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

If I remember correctly... we are around 0.7

We'd be dead because 15th century europeans would've had nuclear bombs.

how advanced would we be now if we didn't waste trillions of dollars trying to make africa a livable place?

What level of advancement do we need to reach in order to stop wiki pledge drives?

Actually, science was made in the dark age, but it was exclusive to catholic church good. If you're not from the catholic church and you're doing science, you're doing evil things and must be burnt! ( ・`д・´)

...

>idiots will believe this

I'm not convinced the dark age is over yet. The world could be much more science friendly.

How so

Daily reminder that this "hole" exists solely because the Catholic Church enforced Aristotlean dogma. Galileo didn't fight the Church; he fought Aristotle.

>1970: climate "scientists" say half the world will be underwater within a decade
>1980: climate "scientists" say half the world will be underwater within a decade
>1990: climate "scientists" say half the world will be underwater within a decade
>2000: climate "scientists" say half the world will be underwater within a decade
>2010: climate "scientists" say half the world will be underwater within a decade

i just cant wait for us to move past this age where inquiring about fake science leads to fascist liberal politicians trying to jail you for not supporting absurd carbon taxes

Galileo was a fucking retard who tried to force others to accept his results without going through the proper process. The Church had absolutely no issue with his hypothesis, they took issue with the fact he tried to say it was fact when he didn't have enough evidence. Makes me sad people like NDT continue to perpetuate this idea of the Church being maliciously anti-science when in the vast majority of cases when scientists got persecuted it was because they were being autistic and trying to force their dogma before collecting enough evidence to make their case properly

I doubt we'd be much different. The Arabs took up the development of science and mathematics during the Middle-Ages, and their knowledge was thereafter expanded upon by the Europeans. The graph you have there is pretty fucking dumb.

Aristotle was the best thinker ever born, don't even say anything about him again.

Africa is the richest and most docile continent, see how it did during colonization.

Aristotle was an incredibly intelligent man, but the breaking away from his ideas in modern science has been incomparably fruitful

It's measured in Liberalisms.

The Christian Church was the only unifying force in Europe after the fall of Rome. It was the only centralized institution which could impose authority on the feudal kings, if it hadn't been there Europe would've fallen into a worse dark age and barbarianism, and probably would've been conquered by Islam.

Of course the Church didn't really help with coming out of the dark age, but shit would've been a whole lot worse if it didn't existed

>Expecting atheist fags to understand

>Unironically believing the Dark Ages were anything more than conservative whining about how great the Roman empire was.

It's like if anthropologists in the future studied Veeky Forums memes and concluded that following the fall of the Third Reich society entered a period of communism, obesity, and newfaggotry.
Fucking hell man. Stop posting, please?

What the fuck are you trying to say? That all of humanity needed one of the smallest continents on Earth to make mistakes so that people who were already firing fucking cannons could learn from their mistakes? Are you seriously this stupid?

Nice work.

Now how many Type 1s per Type 2? Or did the question completely go over your empty fucking head?

Probably about as advanced as the Romans were. They couldn't automate for shit, and barely even used animals.

The "Dark Ages" represented a shift from massive central control of labor, with the power to move workers around to serve the powerful (who had economic interests in suppressing the productivity of the less powerful), to strong local incentives to maximize output with a limited labor pool. From chattel slavery to serfdom.

Hence the windmill and water wheel, the horse collar and the trip hammer, three-field crop rotation and intensive efforts to breed better vegetables and animals.

The separation of temporal and spiritual authority was also a major development. The eternal, international Church, and the acceptance of a class of people aloof from national war, led to the development of the university system, and the ability of scholars to reliably travel and study at widely-separated institutions trying to give similar training, comparing and combining the teachings from several, and discussing them with scholars who have had a similar path through different universities.

This modern age couldn't have happened without the dark ages.

not him
stem cell research is the first thing coming to my mind

Holy shit just kill yourself already you absolute retard

Muslims did the dark ages, if not for their constant attacks we would be alot further in western society, where you see the Renaissance, you see Muslims failing to defeat us, it's the muslims pushing the commie agenda, and why they are affiliated with sjw's

...

tell em

...

Good post.

What are the units in the y axis?

>if it hadn't been there Europe probably would've been conquered by Islam.
Are you implying that would be worse? Why?

>>Expecting atheist fags to understand
Oh, because it's a different skypapa, never mind.

>it's the muslims pushing the commie agenda
You do realise that muslims and commies are literally fucking mortal enemies, right? They detest each other more than a /pol/ack hates SJWs. SJWs associate themselves with muslims because of the multicultural movement, which you are conflating with proletarian internationalism and socialism, which have nothing to do with Islam or the neoliberal (capitalist) SJWs.

>>if it hadn't been there Europe probably would've been conquered by Islam.
>Are you implying that would be worse? Why?
Look at the modern state of Islamic countries. Of course it would be worse.

>different skypapa
Different beliefs and principles.

Jesus (as recorded and idealized): carpenter-turned-preacher. By example a healer, reformer, patient discusser, rejecter of messianic warrior-leader role, only violent against corrupt religious institutions. Self-sacrificing and childless. Taught separation of church and state. Encouraged his followers to spread his doctrine by persuasion and good works.

Mohammed (as recorded and idealized): bandit-turned-conquerer. By example a slaver, rapist, torturer, terrorist, child molester, embracer of messianic warrior-leader role, violent against anything but submission. Selfish and harem-keeping. Taught unification of church and state. Required his followers to spread his doctrine by fire and the sword.

It's stupid to hate all religion equally. The people will inevitably share a common body of fantasies and delusions. The questions are whether they will be led to happiness and productive behavior, and whether the elite will be aware of their true nature or be unable to distinguish them from workaday, literal truths.

Today, having largely turned away from religion which admits to being religion, we find ourselves in the grip of religions which claim to be scientific or otherwise rational, saddled with elites who can't think properly because they can't separate these unquestionable beliefs from practical reality, and therefore can't distinguish decadence from progress.

If we had advanced as much since the Enlightenment as that graph shows we have, we'd be smart enough to recognize totally made up bullshit when it is presented as a nifty graph.

SJW church hating types are retarded when they post this.

So you're telling me because white Europeans had a rough few years in science, *WORLD WIDE* scientific achievement is stymied?

Isn't this implying white Europeans are *SOLELY* responsible for all scientific achievement?

...

I got some bad news for you.

Are you implying that there were no other civilizations or societies anywhere on earth who continued to make progress during this time frame?

>iamsilly.jpg

>Getting angry because the persecution of Galileo is a fabricated meme by atheists who have no historical literacy
How about you just do your own research and stop believing everything you read in Dawkins books? Think for yourself

>THE HOLE LEFT BY ((((THEM))))
fixed

Yes, the White devils stole all the magical success clay in the world and buried it under Europe.

>implying the first dark age following the Finno-Korean hyperwar wasn't much worse

>Now how many Type 1s per Type 2? Or did the question completely go over your empty fucking head?
There is such a thing as a number bewteen 0 and 1.

ah, I forgot about the Centaurians.

>African proto-kangdoms
kek

we'd have nuked ourselves to doom in 1803 rather than 234

>historically attested worldwide flood
this post is gold

Muh nigga
Aristotle should have had the foresight to not ipse dixit his way through half of recent history.

>Look at the modern state of Islamic countries.
>judge all of history by looking at this one point and ascribing the state of things to one specific factor
There have also been times when the Muslim world was better of than Christendom. e.g. the Dark Ages.

>Jesus (as recorded and idealized): carpenter-turned-preacher. By example a healer, reformer, patient discusser, rejecter of messianic warrior-leader role, only violent against corrupt religious institutions. Self-sacrificing and childless. Taught separation of church and state. Encouraged his followers to spread his doctrine by persuasion and good works.

>Mohammed (as recorded and idealized): bandit-turned-conquerer. By example a slaver, rapist, torturer, terrorist, child molester, embracer of messianic warrior-leader role, violent against anything but submission. Selfish and harem-keeping. Taught unification of church and state. Required his followers to spread his doctrine by fire and the sword.
And yet that never stopped Europeans from doing most of those things Mohammed is known for.

>randomly throw in some fucking teenager's social analysis that has nothing to do with comparing Christianity to Islam but haha science is like, totally a religion dude really makes u think
Stop posting any time.

youtube.com/watch?v=Cqzq01i2O3U

KEK

We'd probably be marginally further along but why does it even matter? Causality is as causality does. It was always going to happen and if you could magically loop time back into itself it would happen the same way.

It isn't worth concerning yourself over stuff like this unless it is to learn from it. Lamenting the past just for the sake of it is wasteful.

...

>Ignoring the massive shitskin invasion from the south
>Ignoring the flesh boiling disease that effected countless lives
Bud it wuz cwisteamity fult doh!!!
If it wasn't for Christianity we'd still be stuck in the steel and armor era of brutality having your gay brown boyhole reamed relentlessly by the "religion of peace".