Would a 4th dimensional object produce more or less gravity than a 3rd dimensional object?

Would a 4th dimensional object produce more or less gravity than a 3rd dimensional object?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molniya_orbit
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I think it still depends on the object mass... I mean, they could have 3D and 4D and still have the same mass, right? So they should produce the same gravity...

Depends on its mass.

Exactly user

Only the projection would have mass. Mass doesn't translate through dimensions. The object would technically have infinite mass, as a 3D object is massless in the 4th dimension. The projection would weigh as much as any 3D matter.

pleb question, but what are elliptical Earth orbits used for? I mean, what kind of satellite would benefit from such an orbit?

if we imagine that it has the analogue of 3D mass in 4 dimensions, then less gravity, as the force would be proportional to distance in -3 power

So the projection of a tesseract would produce the same amount of gravity as a cube? What about in a 4th dimensional setting?

space telescopes

yes

Idk, we aren't aware of any type of matter that operates in the 4th dimension. All of our known particles are 3D or at least 3D projections. We would have to make a new concept of mass specifically for 4D particles.

Superstrings operate in 10 dimensions
Supergravity operates in 11 dimensions
Bosonic superstrings operate in 26 dimensions

But then again, these are theoretical objects,

Not part of our standard model.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

The fuck is supergravity?

it's like gravity but better

this

A combination of supersymmetry and general relativity

The fuck is supersymmetry?

symmetry but more

this

Supersymmetry is a type of spacetime symmetry that relates two basic classes of elementary particles: bosons, which have an integer-valued spin, and fermions, which have a half-integer spin.

digits....

like symmetry but better

u know what symmetry is right?

now make it more "super" by increasing its symmetriness.

>4th dimension
La-la land.

If post ends in 9 we should die

The gravitational pull of an object is only dependent on its mass, regardless of how many "dimensions" it is in.

Comms satellites for more polar regions.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molniya_orbit

yes

Depends. Are we comparing a 3d object in 3d space to a 4d object in 4d space with equal masses? If so then in the 4d world our inverse square gravitational law becomes an inverse cube law so the 3d object would exert a greater force assuming that G doesn't also change in the 4d world.

If both objects had 1G of gravity at their surface then as you went up the strength of gravity of the object in four spatial dimensions would drop off more quickly. When the gravitational pull of the 3D object reached 0.5G for example, at the same distance the pull from the 4D object would be 0.25G.

Is time dilation only a 3d thing or will it work in 4d?

Your math is a bit off. if the force is of the 3d object is .5G then the force of the 4d would be [math]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}^3}G=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}G[/math]

No clue. I believe it would still be present but probably the formulas that are used to calculate it would change. Maybe its just a simple change in exponent maybe something more complicated.

GR in 5D induces a 1/r^2 potential for 1/r^3 gravitational force.

The em force is gravity acting along the 5th dim if you like d=11 supergravity theory