Would it have been better if π was defined as 6.28..., meaning circumference in radius instead of diameter?
Would it have been better if π was defined as 6.28..., meaning circumference in radius instead of diameter?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
fs23.formsite.com
twitter.com
A constant factor of 2 is meaningless in this case. You can use your own version of pi-slash if you feel like it, but it seems like a massive waste of time.
[math]e^{i\pi}=1[/math]
Don't you touch that
i think you mean minus one
It's called tau
>implying π exists
Right
>implying it doesnt exist
>he fell for the """"real"""" number meme
Numbers don't fucking exist. You don't see a 4 floating around in space. They're abstract concepts.
Now can we please stop these retarded arguments that poison every single math thread?
>when I read the words circumference and diameter on Veeky Forums
>implying abstract concepts exist
Something doesn't have to be floating around in space for that something to exist.
> implying existence isn't well defined in mathematics
Yeah everything would be about twice as better
we already have T for that
...
tau is hella gay
what other gric letter would you have given it
why are humans so baffled by circles
make sure you order large pizza every time
2pi
...
3.1415926.... is not [math]\pi[/math], it's but a shit approximation of some hypothetical infinite decimal
>infinite decimal
You mean irrational number?
1/3 is rational
If you are the manlet that wrote this you are very stupid
>using analysis to discuss RH
chicken and the egg..
...
how about you express in words what you want to say instead of posting and linking random shit
The union of a manifold with a point is written in LaTeX with the $\cup$, what symbol means the manifold with the point subtracted.