Would it have been better if π was defined as 6.28..., meaning circumference in radius instead of diameter?

Would it have been better if π was defined as 6.28..., meaning circumference in radius instead of diameter?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_(geometry)#Tau_proposal
fs23.formsite.com/viXra/files/f-1-2-9280630_0CKDvEE3_Zeta.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

A constant factor of 2 is meaningless in this case. You can use your own version of pi-slash if you feel like it, but it seems like a massive waste of time.

[math]e^{i\pi}=1[/math]
Don't you touch that

i think you mean minus one

It's called tau

>implying π exists

Right

>implying it doesnt exist

>he fell for the """"real"""" number meme

Numbers don't fucking exist. You don't see a 4 floating around in space. They're abstract concepts.

Now can we please stop these retarded arguments that poison every single math thread?

>when I read the words circumference and diameter on Veeky Forums

>implying abstract concepts exist

Something doesn't have to be floating around in space for that something to exist.

> implying existence isn't well defined in mathematics

Yeah everything would be about twice as better

we already have T for that

...

tau is hella gay

what other gric letter would you have given it

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_(geometry)#Tau_proposal

why are humans so baffled by circles
make sure you order large pizza every time

2pi

...

3.1415926.... is not [math]\pi[/math], it's but a shit approximation of some hypothetical infinite decimal

>infinite decimal
You mean irrational number?

1/3 is rational

If you are the manlet that wrote this you are very stupid

>using analysis to discuss RH

chicken and the egg..

...

fs23.formsite.com/viXra/files/f-1-2-9280630_0CKDvEE3_Zeta.pdf

how about you express in words what you want to say instead of posting and linking random shit

The union of a manifold with a point is written in LaTeX with the $\cup$, what symbol means the manifold with the point subtracted.