Tweets

>tweets
>deep
why does this kind of wroters even exist

Other urls found in this thread:

thefader.com/2015/06/08/mira-gonzalez-tao-lin-twitter-interview-with-juliet-escoria
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/decimate
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

it exists?

>wroters

Better than "Selected Greentext Stories" by Raj Mataj

Because they're all fucking morons, duh.
They eat this shit up.
Tao Lin and Mira "Twitter Is My Career" Gonzalez, are just as brain dead and poisoned as the very people they sucker into reading and purchasing this detritus.

who said theyre deep

Okay guys, someone let me in on the meme. I thought you guys ironically-but-actually-unironically liked Tao Lin but I've only heard of Mira Gonzales when you guys are ripping on her.
I have Taipei on my shelf, waiting to be read. Did I fall for a bad meme?

>contemporary author
>burger literature
And it had all the red flags as well...

I genuinely liked Taipei, for the record.

That said, I think this is silly and I'd never buy it, but it's not put out here as some 'brilliant collection of essays' or 'groundbreaking novella' so I don't have a problem with it. I don't think that I or anyone on Veeky Forums are the intended audience, and while I'm sure I could gleam some witticisms from Lin's selected tweets, I have too many things on my to-read list to bother with something that doesn't appeal.

I won't even bother talking about Gonzalez, it's not worth the effort.

>Selected Greentext Stories
That needs to become an actual book

You're entire post was meaningless drivel. This isn't a fucking blog, you do know that?
I don't care who you liked, or what you do, or don't have a problem with. "I don't think, I don't think..." -- I don't care.

Seriously, what was even the point of your post? It added nothing. It was absolutely pointless? Literally what did you mean by this?

I hate Twitter more than any other "social media" thing and I think less of anyone who uses it.

sorry, my mistake, didn't see my keyboard clearly

or consider it neologism for failed writers

bluepill cuck

thefader.com/2015/06/08/mira-gonzalez-tao-lin-twitter-interview-with-juliet-escoria

forgot link because 2 times I failed to make this thread, technical reasons

why would you buy a book of tweets when twitter is for free?

tweets are a form of writing, what is inherently bad about them?

>"I don't think, I don't think..." -- I don't care.

The irony.

you don't need to publish a book of those tweets.
it's like little teens printing texts from their boyfriends

I meant SMS, sorry, my language speak is bad, t. retarded polan

>year of our lord 2016
>reading literally any other medium than twitter and forum posts
shiggydiggy

>year of our lord 2016
one does translate "anno domini" like this or it's your invention?

only betas refuse to invent their own lexicon

365 days o our God

lurk moar newfriend

>you're entire post
lol

>"I don't think, I don't think..." -- I don't care.
fucking lol

>Literally what did you mean by this?
lol transcendant

certified alpha male poster

desu if they wrote in classical chinese their tweets could actually end up pretty deep

in the leap year of our soverign, he who controls the means of production

what if chinese twitter only let users post messages with 140 strokes

Then it would be a lot less deep.

what if children with down syndrome were allowed to post 150% of norm

the Irish would love that

we're doing what if situations user, not describing real life.

get with the times des family.

btfo
WOW A SPELLING MISTAKE TOTALLY GOT ME DUDE WOW YOU@RE A GENIUS

lol

lol yourself to death, you fucking maggot.

im still laffing

lol

why? it was a near perfect post. it served it's purpose in absolutely decimating his redundant retard post. what's your problem?

>it's
lol again

>absolutely decimating
You reduced it by 1/10th? That's not very impressive.

This thread has just became an ironic autotellic twitter book

it's true, it's not ironic
>he doesn't know the definition of decimating

There are two common definitions:

The first being to destroy a large but unspecified percentage of something.

The second being to reduce a group by 10%.

The first definition's nebulous meaning means that, by definition, it cannot be absolute. Absolute would imply that there was a perfect execution of the decimation, which clearly could only refer to the second definition.

Your adverb choice is poor, and you're shit.

Well then you're a pleb because either would work fine.
E-e-e-e-e n d yourself.

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/decimate

You = BTFO

You're a tedious pedant.

Tbh.

who is purposely derailing my trende?

lol

>ivanka.jpg
as in Trump? meow

when you're too lazy to go through someone's twitter history and prefer to have it in a easy-to-read format

Good lord, the fucking autists ITT...

Because capitalism is selling human dignity.

i'm wroter

you're right, time is money

new meme has was bornd

hypocrites trying to annoy each other to death: Veeky Forums in an nutshell

>but it's not put out here as some 'brilliant collection of essays' or 'groundbreaking novella' so I don't have a problem with it.

Fuck off, just look at the cover, its clear thats how they're marketing it, even if its "ironic"

>Not using Twitter to keep up with breaking news feeds, live happenings and updates, politics, sports rumours and Trump tweets.

Twitter isn't just for teen girls and people who follow celebrities for gossip.

I have had a Twitter for years and have never even tweeted. Its good.

If I wanted that bullshit I'd go on /pol/, it'd be more efficient too

It is a real book

Does it come in hard back?

>finnish author
spurdo sparde on bs

I don't know. I shamefully read the ebook. It made me chuckle in places.

>OP trying to force themselves into memehood