What careers aren't going to be replaced by robots in the near future...

What careers aren't going to be replaced by robots in the near future? I want to get into medicine as either a nurse or in research, and nursing seems like one of those careers where you need the emotional support that only a human can give you, but are robots going to become so advanced that patients can end up relying on them fully?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot-assisted_surgery
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Anything that can be currently done by niggers, could also be done by robots. Aim for engineering, law or medicine.

There are some niggers in the creative world

>law
>job that consists of mostly sifting through endless paperwork and handling forms
>can't be done by a robot
Wew

I don't see robots replacing drug dealers any time soon.

How long will it take until robots won't need to be programmed but just rely on machine learning? And how fucked will we be?

Sales, project management, ...
Basically any job where human interaction is key.

A robot that isn't programmed won't do anything at all.

I don't see a machine being able to do the bullshit mental gymnastics a human lawyer uses anytime soon.

Hell there's no way even if machines could do it that any respectable job like laywers or doctors that has a representation would allow that job to be taken over by machines through pure politics and economics.

prostitution

Porn.

Psychomotor Rehabilitation, it envolves the human facto relating the body to the psichologic factors using movement activities and withoud leaving emotions behind. It is a french movement recently origobated in the 80/90's

>Implying these won't be replaced by robots

>tfw no qt sexbots

Kek, just this morning I was reading an article in my newspaper of how computers were used in law since they could through thousands of papers a second and find procedural mistakes and other stuff. Once this sort of stuff becomes mainstream it'll start costing jobs.

Same for medicine, computers can deliver much more accurate diagnoses.

>sales
a very broad term but becoming a banker is absolute retarded tier
Low level business economy is getting automated really heavily.

Nursing major here.

Nursing is pretty safe bud. There wont be robos that can do our job as efficiently and with the same versatility for a long ass time.

Dumbass. Would you let computers with no emotion cut you up? Surgery will always be done by humans.

>but are robots going to become so advanced that patients can end up relying on them fully?
No, not for at least several hundred years.

That chick from Prometheus got in a machine and got a pretty quick and successful C section.

Checkmate libcuck

>literally C section to remove a disgusting ayy lmao from inside of you
Great example, I concur!

Even if they made super realistic sexbots, in your subconscious you would know that it wasn't a real woman and never be satisfied.

Like people who fuck their fleshlights right?

>Same for medicine, computers can deliver much more accurate diagnoses.

Diagnoses, sure, but do you think sick and vulnerable people want to be treated by robots or actual human beings?

I've never used my pocket pussay and felt as good as I feel after real sex.

Fuck you I have a robot fetish

Many surgeries today are already automated.

No they aren't. I don't know where the hell you live, but my general practitioner near my block still does simple gastrointestinal surgeries not a fucking machine.

Medicine will be almost 100% machine driven.
Notice in Star Wars that all the doctors are robots.
Notice in Fallout 3.. the autodocs (same in Prometheus movie).
SF often predicts the future very well.
A mechanical autodoc, has ALL medical knowledge known, is infinitely careful and patient with you, has complete background on your medical history, and can be programmed to be 100% discrete on your records AND is instantly ready the moment you get to it (if it examines you and you need surgery it can do it RIGHT now).

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot-assisted_surgery

You be a machinist. There will always be work that is more cost effective to run on manual machines as oppose to hiring a programmer or buying more expensive equipment

>One advantage of using the computerised method is that the surgeon does not have to be present, but can be anywhere in the world, leading to the possibility for remote surgery.

You still need to hire the surgeon to control the robot, argument invalid. Therefore surgeons are not losing their jobs to robots, the only difference is that they can chill on the beach of Hawaii while working.

To add, I am an aerospace machinist and the jobs I run are 99% manual machining. Sure, learn programming but my job will not be automated for the foreseeable future.

you shouldn't talk about stuff you know nothing about

Mostly jobs are getting replaced, not careers. That being said this is all for the better, that is if the regulators don't get to it and fuck up the market's reaction to automation

Why are you referencing movies as though they are evidence? Those movies are space operas, not sci-fi..

Medicine and Law will be more and more computer assisted, but the jobs will never be fully automated. Especially in Law, where you often need to determine whether someone is guilty or not. A machine can't do that.
Also, imagine a hotel manager 50 years ago compared to now. Back then, the hotel manager had to keep track of all the people who booked a hotel room, he probably had hundreds of files laying around. He had to handle a ton of cash, handle the finances, check if someone is overdue with a payment, or overdue on moving out, etc.
Nowadays a hotel manager just has to press a few buttons on a pc and everything is taken care of.