When you study the PUREST and MOST COMPLEX field ever, PHILOSOPHY

You cant know. Its up to you if you want to believe me or not. We could just basically replace all mathematicians with computers. But you cant replace philosophers m9

the fuck you on?
for a philosopher you seem to know fuck all about what an axiom is, when you have a problem you don't just go hmm ill introduce a new axiom

If you have a problem its because you are low iq.
Even my 7 yo cousin can deduce a solution from a starting set of axioms.

"philosophers" who spend a lot of time just doing logic are mathematicians.

Your argument comes from ignorance.

everyone has problems. yours seems to be retardation given your weak ass trolling

you start with a set of axioms, you don't go "Im struggling with this problem ill add 1 more thank you very much"

mathematician is an insult now?
how many layers of irony is this

hmmmm really makes my neurons fire

That's not mathematical Physics

I have a bachelor in philosophy and I began studies again to study mathematics, for I realised :
1) Students in philosophy aren't very intelligent (more than in other Humanities though).
2) Maths are more difficult and fairly deserve more respect (and receive more respect)
3) Maths give you a better picture of the world and of existence than philosophy does.

I'll have a number 3 with fries please

...

Mathematicians will never be replaced by computers. When they do they'll be 1 year from replacing philosophy as well. You clearly don't understand anything about mathematics.

It's not uncreative. It's rigorous.

And I don't get why OP claims maths are less complex than philosophy. Is it because the maths level in the US is extremely low (more or less the same as African niggers) ?

>philosophers
>logic
there's fucking no axioms in philosophy. It's all made up on the spot.

OP here but i fucking kek'd

>Even my 7 yo cousin can deduce a solution from a starting set of axioms.
>anyone can solve problems using axioms instead of creative thinking.
t. Person who has no Idea about mathematics.

Here, have some axioms. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo–Fraenkel_set_theory

And here your problem. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis

Good luck philotard.

You idiots are really fucking retarded to believe that your shitty field, which is about vaguely (why haven't you formalized everything) proposing questions and then vaguely saying that you dont know the answer, is in any way relevant or leads to some deeper truths.

At least theologians have job prospects.

Philosophers are cool if they are conservative. Otherwise they're just charlatans and sophists (put another way, pricks) who want more control over your life. Yep, talking to you, cultural marxists)

bruh get over here and answer my quston

Fire is an element.
World stunned

Philosopher reporting in. I have your answer. We do not know. It's as simple as that.
Oh and philosophical determinism and physical determinism are two completely different things. You can have physical indeterminism and philosophical determinism. Free will has nothing to do with physics. An electron has no choice to have its spin up or down when you measure it. However, it's not determined.
Well, I'd say that currently everything goes in the sense of determinism, free will basically has the status of the soul, we don't see it and have no big reasons to think it's an actual thing.

Go back to /pol/ idiot

Thanks m8
Not 100% sober rn but will reread tomorrow

Good post

Logic is a subset of math, not philosophy.

Philosophy is for people too dumb to apply logic

not to defend the op but it's a subset both.