Can i get some expanding brain memes

can i get some expanding brain memes

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8137688
math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/math1132s14/handouts/taicomments.pdf
m.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqPMxWhQZw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

I wasn't gunna reply to this bread but that last panel made me laugh

...

bump

...

...

fuck it

...

...

Underrated

fucking lol

Nah, I'll just get banned again.

Someone should do one for Newcomb's Paradox or P / NP.

...

the earth is flat
all round things are flat
everything is flat actually
i can prove this

>Newcomb's paradox
fresh off the press

Fucking kek.

not bad

...

Feeling like a brainlet. What's the joke here? Is there some mistake in the formulas/graph?

just more and more verbose definitions of an integral

the last one is from an article that was published recently in a medical journal claiming they had just discovered how to find the area under a curve.

is this shit real?

Yeah there were threads about it some months ago

i am 199% newfag on Veeky Forums

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8137688
It is asolutely real.

holy shit
math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/math1132s14/handouts/taicomments.pdf
>because Tai's model is based on the calculations of individual squares and triangles its precision is obviously absolute
>Tai responds that her formula is based on the sum of the areas of small triangles and rectangles and is not based on the sum of the area of trapezoids

I always thought the paper was a joke. There's no way anyone is that retarded

>math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/math1132s14/handouts/taicomments.pdf

>"Tai considers that the "true value" for the area under the curve is obtained by plotting the curve on graph paper and counting the squares under the curve"

This makes no sense I am an autistic linguist and I can't take a joke.

Fucking again? This shit keeps happening like every 5 years. Now I get that they don't know shit about math, but they don't even notice that every five years there's a new "revolutionary method of calculating area under the trendlines of statistical data" in their own med journals? WHO THE FUCK GIVES THESE PEOPLE THEIR DEGREES

physicians are brainlets. they are rote memorizers, not puzzle solvers.

The article in question is from 1994 and has, I assume, been passed around a lot.

why is 2-box better?

less sophisticated to more sophisticated

it's not
that's why the brain is small

saved kek

I remember seeing Veeky Forums shitting their pants over a biology professor that had "rediscovered" integration. real kek worthy

Engineer here.

10 seems risky. I would factor that up by 1.5.

15 is more reasonable

...

Arrhenius equation needs to be higher

...

WRONG

...

...

epin :DDDDDD

Mr president pls you have things to do

i'm gonna fuck assad's boipucci

That would be highly appreciated. Just don't shitpost.

Sad!

saad witen. thingken.

BUT NOW WITEN HAS AWAKEN!!!! RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

bogdanov got me holy kek

...

...

is three a greens function? asking for a friend

kek

Three is just the definition of the Riemann integral

10/10

...

Shite it's real

I like your pics OP.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqPMxWhQZw

thats not how the meme works

How about this version?

i like this more
saved

>wildbergian

Uh, that is actually the Fundamental Theorem of Taiean Calculus.

>"Meme-Theoretic Theoretical Physics Memes" on facebook
Dude.

...