If 0.999... = 1.000.. then does ...999 = 100...?
If 0.999... = 1.000.. then does ...999 = 100...?
Daniel Roberts
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Gavin Bennett
no
9.9999.. = 10though
and so is 99.99999... equal to 100
you get the idea, frog brainlet
Charles Walker
Actually ...999=-1
Jaxson Evans
funnily enough, this is literally true in the ring of 10-adic numbers
Gavin Rogers
mods delete this shitpost thread
Isaac Allen
Why will this acutely autistic meme not die?
Grayson Reyes
if you believe a bunch of infinitely repeating nines can equal 1 with an infinite amount of zeros after it then how can you then say a bunch of infinitely repeating nines cannot equal 1 with an infinite amount of zeros after it?
Brayden Roberts
That's the joke
Jose Smith
>if you believe a bunch of infinitely
STOPPED HERE, INFINITY DOESN'T EXIST
Angel Turner
>...999 = 100...
Yes
Dominic Martinez
>10-adic numbers
Oh sure, 10 is such a nice prime number, isn't it?
Thomas Ortiz
then how can 0.999 = 1.00?
wouldn't that mean 0.999 can never reach 1 and is therefore not = 1?
Xavier Anderson
0.999 = 1.00 EVALUATES TO FALSE
WHAT YOU MEAN IS
0.999... = 1.00
WHICH IS EVALUATES TO BULLSHIT BECAUSE 0.999... ISN'T AN ACTUAL NUMBER BECAUSE INFINITY DOESN'T EXIST
Carson Russell
What's with the leading …?
Levi Wright
Is it the same person that keeps starting these threads?
Jaxon Butler
I AM SO FUCKING SICK OF THESE THREADS GETTING INFINITE REPLIES
DO YOUR FUCKING JOB YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING IDIOT MODS
Jackson Baker
the number grows by the same pattern infinity in the positive direction.
William Flores
you never can tell these days who's joking or not
Jace Bell
Then it's equal to infinity, not 100.
Landon Myers
>the ring of 10-adic numbers
the only reason you'd want p to be prime is to get a field. you can still define a ring of n-adic numbers for any natural number n.
Benjamin Anderson
then 0.999.. is = to infinity and not 1?