Why does this board hate women? Arguably, literature is a hobby that is enjoyed by both sexes in equal measure...

Fine you egotist, why do MOST OF THE POSTERS hate women.

All memes have a residue of truth - this is why they become infectious.

So you have no respect for them then? Why have a gf then? Why not just fuck indiscriminately? Also, they don't sound high quality if they're like that annoying woman from TYT

A residue is not enough.

because women are subhuman

I have gfs sometimes but most of the time I do have casual things.

They were very high quality, relatively speaking. But even the most high quality woman is still fundamentally a child. It's all a matter of degree.

Subhuman. Homo sapiens do not reproduce asexually; therefore the female is necessary and part of the species. Sorry.

You mean "homo sapiens does not reproduce asexually."

Women almost exclusively read young adult garbage like the Hunger Games and the million other books that are exactly like the Hunger Games.

If you ask them their favourite book, 9 times out of 10 they will say Harry Potter.

they're a subhuman that occasionally makes humans and also subhumans

if your best argument is a pedantic one then you've already lost

Homo Sapiens is also the plural.

So, OP here. Am I to take it that the entire board is Red Pill types who happen to like reading?
Well, that's all the answer I need.
Women are children etc. They deserve no respect, have no intelligence, are all whores, are subhuman etc, and it's usually the same with non white races and jews.

Now, one could replace the word 'women' with 'men' or 'black/jewish' with 'white' and you'd have a tumblr rant.

Basically the internet infantalises people and this is just one side of the retarded and overly black and white thinking coin that spawned SJWs.

Mate, you're being memed and you called it upon yourself.

A species is used as a collective noun in the singular.

"Homo sapiens sapiens is the current human species."
Not:
"Homo sapiens sapiens are the current human species."

Alrighty, head on back to r/reading then, my friend.

I never said I don't like the books talked about on here. I'll just talk about them with a real person.

Just avoid meme posters and /pol/ friends.

For me personally, it's because every English teacher at school was a feminist who made us all read terrible feminist literature and poetry. I've endured enough shitty female literature to last a lifetime and with very few exceptions would never want to pick up a book authored by a woman ever again.

There simply is no piece of literature written by a woman that comes close to the inarguable classics of male literature. Wuthering Heights is probably the closest, and it always comes about 25th in Veeky Forums's book rankings

As Virginia Woolf said, women haven't created much because in order to create you need "A Room of One's Own'

>Here's why, in addition to Roxane Gay, Bey and Lena Dunham, Virginia Woolf should be one of your feminist role models:
huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/virginia-woolf-feminist_n_6534258

isn't the point of that post you replied to that women have created too much and it's shit

Really? Jesus Christ

>entire board

no, just the overly vocal /pol9k/ shitposting newfags who never, ever, EVER shut the fuck up about their triggers

post 2013 has all been downhill

but there's a huge amount of literature and poetry by women, it's all just shit.

jesus christ shut up

You can place any hedonistic pleasure in the same group of distractions; do not condemn it but understand that love and sex is the most ideological consumptious of them all.

Everyone is addicted to love because everyone has been exposed to it; and everyone is constantly going through withdrawal. Always yearning, never passing an opportunity to love.

Preference of style over substance.

>“I have a terrible confession to make—I have nothing to say about any of the talented women who write today. Out of what is no doubt a fault in me, I do not seem able to read them. Indeed I doubt if there will be a really exciting woman writer until the first whore becomes a call girl and tells her tale. At the risk of making a dozen devoted enemies for life, I can only say that the sniffs I get from the ink of the women are always fey, old-hat, Quaintsy Goysy, tiny, too dykily psychotic, crippled, creepish, fashionable, frigid, outer-Baroque, maquillé in mannequin’s whimsy, or else bright and stillborn. Since I’ve never been able to read Virginia Woolf, and am sometimes willing to believe that it can conceivably be my fault, this verdict may be taken fairly as the twisted tongue of a soured taste, at least by those readers who do not share with me the ground of departure—that a good novelist can do without everything but the remnant of his balls.” — Advertisements for Myself - Norman Mailer

The attitude of the common man is to revel in his ignorance. Through his own stupidity, or perhaps insecurity, he disdains what he sees as 'below' him and makes no pretenses as to understanding. His virtue is the honesty of an imbecile, direct and separate.

The common woman, however, is not content with declaring something unavailable to her. Where the man parts with literature, she looks at it with the opportunistic eyes of a scavenger, attempting to immitate others and restructure definition for the sake of her own self aggrandizement. It is a polluted touch that delegitimizes what it reaches for, to the disservice of its true admirers.

women dont understand what they read user

Cutebois > Women

Prove me wrong

Because they control the means of reproduction

good post

"Women are considered deep. Why? Because one can never discover any bottom to them. Women are not even shallow".

Very nice.

As long as they're Asian crossdressers I'm good

My only complaint against women is that they constantly need to compare themselves to men. I realise that this is necessary for the obvious subversive nature of feminism, but maybe I just haven't read enough female literature to comment on that. Any recommendations?

They will always cheat on you. And arbitrarily too, sometimes the guy is not even more good looking or anything, they do it for the thrill of a new dick.

Men will always cheat on you. And arbitrarily too, sometimes the girl is not even more good looking or anything, they do it for the thrill of a new pussy.

It's not against women, per say, but most women like shitty YA and Fantasy novels. If I found a girl who was actually into dirty realism, historical fiction, the beats, the classics, philosophy, and object-oriented ontology then I'd be in love.

Until then I'm just sick of hearing about their love of Harry Potter, LOTR, 50 Shades of hypocritical SJW spatter on a page, and other talentless YA books.

Don't reply to obvious bait, woman! Recommend me something

Honestly this thread is fucking cancer and I should report you, but I don't know if it actually violates the rules so I'd rather not get banned.

Not if the guy she is dating is the usual beta provider that is only present to make her seen more respectable.

Cutboys can't give you heirs. Unfortunately.

>LOTR
This is good shit though.

how is 50 shades of grey SJW?

>My only complaint against women is that they constantly need to compare themselves to men.
Penis envy is real.

>literature is a hobby that is enjoyed by both sexes in equal measure

Haha.

No.

This

Autistic thread it's even funny to read these posts

Women are uncultured ignorant animals.

The only decent ones are tied by the hip to a decent man or heavily influenced by overbearing male family members.

>my only complain
blind pleb.

>LOTR is good though
no

The book itself is not, but the point was that it is hypocritically beloved by SJW women.

The hate comes from the contrast between what young men expect women to be and what women actually are. It is born out of disappointment. They are unable to simply accept the world the way it is and remain stuck at the state of anger.

Feminism has turned women from merely disappointing to disgusting.

>be half-jokingly misogynistic for the sake of bantz on the internet
>assmad women who can't take a joke spend 6 hours flipping out about it
>tfw you bantz that women can't handle the bantz, and women literally reply by not handling it

Can't the same be said for the reversal of genders?

The hate comes also from the continued contact with a cunt.
Their tendency to whine and cry to manipulate you emotionally, and their complete incapability of doing anything by themselves and for themselves, for the sake of it -thats what you realise if you're not another one of the completely blind 99% of men too stupid and too driven by their sex drive to even consider that their deities with tits and the paradise between their legs might be not just human, but way more sneaky and false than men.

women are just children, user.

Indeed it can. Men and women were not always in this despicable dysfunctional state but it is a sign of the times. Welcome to the kali yuga.

this

>Ressentiment is a sense of hostility directed at that which one identifies as the cause of one's frustration, that is, an assignment of blame for one's frustration. The sense of weakness or inferiority and perhaps jealousy in the face of the "cause" generates a rejecting/justifying value system, or morality, which attacks or denies the perceived source of one's frustration. This value system is then used as a means of justifying one's own weaknesses by identifying the source of envy as objectively inferior, serving as a defense mechanism that prevents the resentful individual from addressing and overcoming their insecurities and flaws. The ego creates an enemy in order to insulate itself from culpability.

Ask yourself what kind of person is attracted to Veeky Forums. In short, they're angry losers

good post user

>norman mailer didn't like women writers
quelle fuckin surprise

not gonna lie, i've never met the kind of feminist that Veeky Forums and reddit complain about. They obviously exist somewhere, because as soon as one of them does something like the hugh mungus thing it's all over the internet. I have feminist friends and I've been in relationships with feminists and they seem perfectly reasonable to me.

my desire for women is only sexual, I can't find it in myself to admire them in any other way. Is this uncommon? I feel like most people are the same but cannot reveal it

I'd imagine it's just as hard for a woman as it is for a guy to to find someone who can be true, honest, and open one that is desirous to live a minimalist and materialist life in it's truest sense that rejects consumerism and focuses on the value of the objects.

Though, I'm not sure many exist. Perhaps they do but they are chained by the ills of commercialism driving society to consume more and more as though that will make their lives whole and the belief that freedom is the ability to fuck people over without having any regret or sense of empathy towards the effects of one's own actions.

It's not gender specific, but because both genders experience it within their quest to find company or a relationship it further divides us and increases contempt and resentment.

>Is this uncommon?
No. I suspect however that it is precisely this sexual attraction to them that has made them this cunty in the first place. Would they have to work for their success like men they would eventually turn into nice relatable people too I think.

so feminism is basically ressentiment?

Yes. /pol9k/ retards are just the obverse of their tumblr equivalents

Because they're not too bright

And collective nouns can sometimes be singular and plural, depending on whose grammar you're reading. English is not as set in stone as some think it is.

All things flow

You're on an imageboard. There's always going to be an overap with /r9k/ and /pol/ retards. Yes, there will be the occasional redditor who calls out their bullshit but for the most part I'd hope the majority just ignore it because the purpose of this board is not to argue with dumbasses about social issues and instead focus on lit.

does anyone remember what happened to feminister

last time I was here she got outed as making fake threads about herself as an anonymous poster
did anyone ever get to the bottom of it

just curious desu

You can say that about most random passerby or Chad too, though.

>Why does this board hate women?
I don't hate women. Most probably don't but people who hate things are obviously more emotionally invested than people who don't, and thus more likely to go on about it.

As the great emperor once said, "Il faut que les femmes tricotent."

"Pretty girls make graves."

Women are petty creatures, but we don't need to hate them. It is like if you were a pro player in some game, and then you would be saying to a rookie that HAH YOU SUCK SO MUCH FUCK I HATE YOU.

It makes no sense, just leave things to their own value. That's what real men do, when they deal with women, they ''play along'' with them. They do not take them seriously.

I don't hate women, and never will. I know a large number of women who have excellent taste in literature, mostly professors and other academics. I usually only get to talk with them at conferences, but I never have a doubt about their intelligence or dedication to their field.

That's not to say I don't know women, like extended family members (and my sisters, honestly), who are absolutely garbage human beings and stupid to boot, but I don't consider them representative of every woman I meet.

Here's a screencap of a Veeky Forums thread a few years back, OP. Veeky Forums's always been fairly anti-woman, but it's only become more prominent recently with the crossboarders.

Here's the second part of that thread.

>pretty much my diary desu

excluding the buzzwords that triggered you little boy ego, point out what you disagree with in the article

literally all of them are worthless.

...

So your evidence is a TV show? I've been married to a woman (with graduate degrees in literature and music) for a decade, and she has never pulled any shit of that nature. Not even once.

Everyone ITT is a virgin, plain and simple.

Some girl hurt them sometime and instead of getting over it like an adult they decided to form their entire worldview around why all women are bad.

I'm not even going to bother scrolling through this thread, it's a guaranteed bitter virgin circlejerk, and that's coming from someone who thought the whole 'bitter virgin' thing was just a leftwing meme for the longest time.

haha gays

>compromising
>ever
no no no. you just learn to be right and be able to prove it beyond her personal feelings regarding the matter. same way i showed my wife that bernie was a scam artist and that communism is evil. she was mad until she swallowed her pride and eventually opened her eyes to see that not everything that glimmers is gold, and that ideology is always to be separated from reality. it was hard for her to realizing i wasn't attacking her ideal of free shit for everyone, or general happiness and pacifism worldwide, but rather that it was frankly unrealistic.

i hear about politics ruining relationships, and i can't help but feel that they're just bad at having a genuine fucking discussion with someone, and if you can't have that, then why the fuck would you want to be in a relationship with them?

women are like men, in that they are all fucked up and mentally unstable.

Because their mothers

What about your wife's son?
Could you convince him as well?