Are there any observable things in nature or scientific facts that run counter to the theory of evolution and are their any skeptics in Veeky Forums of evolution?
Are there any observable things in nature or scientific facts that run counter to the theory of evolution and are their...
Elijah Hall
Kayden Phillips
no.
go to class. read textbooks.
Ryder Lewis
Oliver Smith
>mfw reading american textbooks that are about 10% accurate
Joseph Sanchez
Wtf? Americans can read? I thought all they could do was eat.
Jackson Butler
>like stars n shit
>friend knows i like stars n shit
>friend sends me this link
>make the mistake of click
>make another mistake by reading a few comments
youtube.com
>are their any skeptics
Welcome to Veeky Forums, Christian Shill.
Tyler Nguyen
What do stars have to do with evolution? Are they giant space fire flies or something?
William Thompson
>believing in magic
You have to be 18 to post here
Jack Johnson
There is not just one theory of evolution. So you could be skeptical of a theory but still believe in evolution. But it usually refers to Darwin's. Darwin actually offered ways to prove his theory wrong. Which seems quaint in today's popsci. But is how you are actually supposed to fucking do science.
Chase White
I absolutely destroyed Darwin's theory here. Also, I destroyed everyone who is always yelling about how evolution is the true history of human kind.
>The Truth About Evolution
>vixra.org
Joseph Wood
>Darwin's theory
Ok then, what about the modern or extended synthesis?
Gabriel Myers
The fact that we've witnessed evolution happening since Darwin's time cements the fact that it is real.
You have to be 18yo to post on Veeky Forums, kid.
Andrew Carter
>DNA
What about the fossil record, ya doof?
Nathan Bailey
It's possible for Darwin's theory to be wrong and a theory of evolution to be correct. Something could prove Lamarck's theory correct or that both can occur. And some parse out a difference between Darwin and Wallace.
Henry Carter
>0 comments
You took the world by storm, user.
Don't let anybody hold you back!
Luke Bailey
I like Flat Earth threads better
Parker White
Which part of the theory of evolution? That men and apes share an ancestor? Or that evolution happens in general? Because the second is just fact. Observe the domesticated dog. We did that. new generations do change over time and whether the selective pressures on reproduction are artificial or natural when they favor whichever trait, evolution will occur.
The man and apes thing, fuck it. That's a fact too. I can't defend it as eloquently, but fuck you if it isn't obvious to you and sky fairies seem more plausible.
Thomas Price
The theory of evolution is living things get better over time to become more sexually successful. Even non-living things like viruses and Ribozymes evolve.
Evan Adams
>better
>to become more sexually successful
"Better" in whatever circumstances led to its success, but not actually better in any net sense.
and
They don't evolve "to" become more sexually successful. They evolve because they were more sexually successful.
Gavin King
I was being incredibly broad and basic in that definition. Bringing up natural selection would have added another 4-5 sentences.
Thomas Evans
Did anyone actually read this?
I just finished a seminar class focused on scientific writing and it made this extra hilarious to me.
Elijah Foster
of parts yeah.
But evolution as a whole has mountains of evidence now.
There's been a couple of fraud missing links.
A couple others that are within breeding distance of modern animals.
Also, it seems like you could almost draw arbitrary spectrums and trees of life based on similarity, especially if you're missing huge gaps in the fossil record.
Ryan Hill
>observable things
Well, lack thereof. No one has observed speciation. No one has produced any relevant models of one trait that has been selected or eliminated. No one has observed the "fittest" do anything but destroy their environment and eventually themselves.
Jordan Hall
A few, but they usually get debunked sooner or later
Elijah Morgan
No.
Dylan Flores
the fact that the world is only 65 million years old.
Matthew Myers
>en.wikipedia.org
>it is impossible to tell what animal this was
>we know for certainty that this is a chimera
>both of these theories have terrible implications for scientism
>as does the notion that birds existed in the late triassic
>as does putting the damper on this fossil and many like it
It works! It's settled! Bitch!
Jacob Peterson
>we've witnessed evolution happening since Darwin's time
Many such cases indeed.
Cooper Russell
The second law of thermodynamics mathematically proves that evolution is a lie.
See
Jaxon Morris
When i'm feeling down, i always read som hep article on vixra