Can someone recommend me some good Anti-Capitalist literature? Preferably Anarchist and Marxist...

youtube.com/watch?v=ccEbUhKHsJI

Epic satire!

Bunkermag.org

Why aren't you a fan?

left communism is the most obscure ideology there is, read some of the bordster and you'll become the edgiest guy on the block

Getting ready to read his works.

A fan?

...

...

>Who is the true friend of the people? Fascism is. Who has done the most for the working man? The USSR or Hitler? Hitler has... Who has done the most for the small businessman? Not Thorez but Hitler!

Boss-worker relationship, Oppressive Social Hierarchies, Wage Slavery, Imperialistic Foreign Policy, Theft of Surplus Value, Anti-Worker system, lots of reasons.

Anarchism and Marxist ideologies are pro-capitalist. They are deployed by upper class oligarchs to liquidate business competition, break down the middle class, and compact the plebs into a feudalistic situation. If you want to read about Marxism without being bored, I suggest Gramsci.

U N D E R R A T E D

FUCKING PASOLINI

Petrolio
Corsair Writings

Pro-Capitalist? I guess you could say that Marxism isn't all that very critical of Capitalism (since Marx thought of it as the most efficient system, and he argued that we don't need that level of efficiency) but i wouldn't say it was pro-capitalist.

>Boss-worker relationship
In what way?
>Oppressive Social Hierarchies
In what way?
>Wage Slavery
Fallacy.
>Imperialistic Foreign Policy
Evidence?
>Theft of Surplus Value
No such thing unless under very specific circumstances.
>Anti-Worker system
In what way?
>lots of reasons
Like what?

>Boss-worker relationship
Boss has 50 employees. Worker only has one job. If the boss has to fire someone he is only down 2% on production. If the worker is fired he will starve. Without collective bargaining the worker is fucked.

>Oppressive Social Hierarchies
See above. Also rags to riches is a myth.

>Wage Slavery
see above

>Imperialistic Foreign Policy
ever heard of a banana republic?

>No such thing unless under very specific circumstances.
literally the definition of an investor

Also to OP, are you looking for fundamental works or is more personal literature ok?

The Jungle by Upton Sinclair is socialist literature that Amerifats read and only cared about rat feces in their food.

Amerifat here. We didn't read it in school, it was just mentioned in passing. Orwell was also spun as being anti-left

It's an interesting nuance lost over the years that Marx is quite admiring of capitalism. CAPITALISM IS EVIL is not a judgement he or any serious Marxist ever made. That's why Deng Xiaoping did nothing wrong: for socialism capitalism is scientifically necessary.

I believe Sinclair is quoted saying "I aimed for their heads and hit their stomaches" since his book helped push making the FDA.

...

>spun as
he was a worthless snitch shit tho

u wot?

Just say communistic literature you fucking beta

Please update this with "The Rules for Radicals" by Saul Alinski. It's literally the step by step instructional handbook for how modern Liberals destroy a system to later replace with another. A must for any Socialist radical.

Liberalism and socialism are two entirely different ideological traditions, and nobody takes alinsky seriously

Alinsky is pop-leftism for Democrat crybabies

>Please don't read Saul Alinsky

Isn't he just about organizing communities and stuff? I can see why you're afraid of him.

Threepenny Novel by Bertolt brecht

...

Grow up and get a job.

Ironically Hitler was originally a decent Leftist economist, and only started fucking up when he got into actually Fascist ideas like expansionism and eugenics. The more you know...

by the GHOSTWRITER*

I prefer this one desu

Anti-capitalism =/= pro-communism, necessarily, there are other schools of thought like the An-Syndies

>Can someone recommend me some good Anti-Capitalist literature?

American here, so I'll talk about what I know. America has had two great anti-capitalist thinkers.

One is Calhoun, whose writing has some overlap with Marxist thinking, but he is never read anymore because of his defense of slavery.

The other is Thorstein Veblen. His writing (from the early 20th century) is actually incredibly prescient, but he isn't taught or read much today because he *isn't* a Marxist. He used to be read a decent amount in the university, but upon Marxists largely taking over American universities, he's largely ignored.

>Preferably Anarchist and Marxist.
So you mean impractical and largely detached from reality? What's the point, then?