Who are the best legitimate youtubers to listen to for learning about any science related topic?
Ones that are both entertaining and informative
Who are the best legitimate youtubers to listen to for learning about any science related topic?
Ones that are both entertaining and informative
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Isaac Arthur is one of my favorites.
His videos look interesting, but what is his accent? Not being mean but it's hard to listen to
PBS Spacetime, my man
Fermilab, 3blue1brown, vsauce, brady harans stuff
...
Please. Don't do this. Not here. Anywhere but here.
Yeah this guy is pretty based.
What's wrong user? Truth hurts.
>a man who cant decide what he really is but proceeds to tell everybody he is a certain way when every chance he gets he shows the signs of being something entirely different
Yeah, no. He made a fool out of himself in those retarded ''debates'' he had with destiny.
Another Stefan Molyneux for the average pol cuck
Nigga, Sargon is such a contrarian that he even hates /pol/.
Because in a thread about "science related topics" in a "science and math" board you shouldn't be discussing about genders or patriarchy or identity politics.
>based
go back to /pol/ faggot
Muh essence of calculus
it's not an accent, he has a speech defect and he's aware of it, that's why he writes subs for all of his videos
Got a problem, motherfucker?
>Refusing to touch topics because they offend you.
That's real sciency kid.
I thought this was the smart board?
>>>/reddit/
this and fermilab
VSAUCE
>feminists are ruining my videogames
this troll post will dreail the thread
Agree on "entertaining and informative" but wrong board buddy.
He's not contrarian, he's intellectually disciplined and reasonable, which /pol/ is not. A lot of the General posts are good like SG but everything else is intellectually undsciplined and unreasonable.
>Fermilab, 3blue1brown, vsauce, brady harans stuff
>Isaac Arthur is one of my favorites.
>PBS Spacetime, my man
/thread
he knows
I just started watching blackpenredpen, really enjoy the interesting integrals.
He has a speech impairment, lad. I actually came here to recommend the guy too. He does really well thought out videos on space stuff. Just turn closed captions on.
I bought a mic and am going to start a long term project going through foundations up to statistical physics. You may subscribe here
youtube.com
Ignore any test videos, I'll start in the mid of June. I have the first 30 videos of so outlined, but I'll go on for a long time here, no hurry. First Curry-Howard, the logic, relevant foundational constructions and then on the proper math eventually...
>Sargon is /pol/
Sargon is a libtard cuck, fuck off. Anyway, nice derail, faggots
So this might be a groaner for Veeky Forums but I kinda like flat earth threads for how silly they can get. Started watching flat earther videos and then later the debunking youtubers.
This dude's one of the debunkers
Professional pilot. Does some very simple and yet cool experiments to prove the shape and the rotation of the earth. Like the Eotvos effect while in flight.
Will it be a college level course or will it only be at the highschool level?
Don't you dare slander him
pol hates him tho
It will be raw and bottom-up in a very strong sense. Here some bullet points I eventually want to get to www.AxiomsOfChoice.org
Terry Davis
...
>I am a theoretical physicist working in computer vision.
How does a Theoretical physicist end up with a CS job?
Cody's Lab
Real Engineering
Isaac Arthur
you know she knows shit about math, right
That's her writer's job. I just like to listen to her.
That guy has a california republic t-shirt on.
I really wish I knew the story behind this pic.
Kurzgesagt
to learning about and implement stuff like
en.wikipedia.org
together with
en.wikipedia.org
on the fly and even enjoy it.
I might also argue that CS people are more autistic to work with than theoretical physicists, but I know that that's a pretty questionable statement.
btw. I'm also writing about numerical integration schemes on Lie groups, and stuff, and I'll eventually get there, but for now I'll do foundations and that will take 200*10 minutes minimum. It should also stay relevant for a "general audience" of math interested forks.
Your newfag is showing
This dude really makes good videos.
A good detox from all the pol cuck propaganda.
James May: The Reassembler
Photonicinduction
Steve1989
you guys have fucking garbage taste, go watch 200+ hours of leonard susskind lectures immediately
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
should have posted thunderf00t who is at least relevant, but you're probably an alt-right retard
thunderf00t is a bit annoying though. He overstates his points far too much.
best post ITT
this fag sucks
youtube.com
Nile Red, pretty good if you're into orgo-chem
youtube.com
Cody's Lab, autism in it's best form
I like 3 brown 1 blue
Any more channels like his?
if you're a babby who needs high school-level prereqs
calc 1/2: youtube.com
calc 3 (multivar/vector calc): youtube.com
diff eqs: youtube.com
lin alg: youtube.com
basic physics 1 (newtonian mechanics/relativity): youtube.com
basic physics 2 (electromagnetism/quantum mechanics): youtube.com
then watch susskind lectures
you should listen to some of jonathan bowden's speeches to understand the furious energy behind the new right as a social and cultural movement. his voice lives on after his untimely death, and seems prescient.
fascism is natural, since all human beings are vastly unique and unequal and organise into hierarchies regardless of what the system you implement. this is what machiavelli's the prince is about. being a ruler and being ruled is relative, since they are both required to dance together for any stability.
you may disagree with this, and want to find the cure for inequality, elevating all future humans up to some vastly superior level with science and machines, but until then it is important to remember this is exactly what christianity tried to do and in the process got a lot of people killed, the same is the case with communism. both have been buried culturally (and exhumed) with secular humanism and democratic socialism carrying their tattered flags as living memories.
>no two people are equal
>no two groups of people are equal
we are different, and these differences are what create anything of value. internal group dynamics from inequality and external tensions between groups is the entire past of recorded human history and it is HOW we got to this position in history. are you ready to intellectually shelve all of that? foundations are important for progress to be made in any field. it's a balancing act between new and old.
you're also a faggot that sucks
also if you need to brush up on arithmetic/algebra then go to khanacademy
Based black guys amirite?
all memes aside, I honestly enjoy numberphile. Their quality fluctuates a lot based on which professor is talking, but overall they're fun and entertaining.
It's not like they're actually teaching you math but they're like a fun math trivia show
>implying you would watch her content if she was a man
fuck off
potholer54
cringeworthy trash
you're so gullible
"entertaining and infortmative" if you're still in high school, sure
>intellectually disciplined and reasonable
have you even watched his videos?
fucking kek, thunderf00t is even worse
what could a youtube channel give that uni lectures cab't provide?
Style of presentation?
Or coverage of topic?
You're mistaking disrespectfulness with intellectual dishonesty. Sargon cites his sources when he makes his points, which is not only what makes him an honest pundit, but is also what really what sets him apart and makes him such a pain in the ass for his opposition to deal with without misrepresenting him.
If you want someone more respectful, watch Lindybeige. The shit Sargon's been reacting to, Lindy has seen coming from over five years away.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoUrYjUjJJc
Heh no thanks bro I took algebraic topology in 6th grade
>doesnt believe in human caused climate change
Is he >>>/ourguy/ ?
Lindy doesn't believe in political partisanship. He just calls them as he sees them and looks for empirical sources for his positions. There's just a lack of empirical sources for that particular topic, so he remains skeptical, especially when both media and government establishments are capitalizing on the climate change narrative.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TlD26uscdQ
>Some of the people who've been e-mailing me seem to think that I'm sort of "on their side"
>If you're scientists, and you've got good evidence for this stuff, don't leave it to amateur nerds like Al Gore to get it across
>If anyone does ever present any good evidence for global worming theory, I'll change my mind, because that's what scientists do
A big cause for it is that the journalists don't have access to places like Research Gate and the Web of Knowledge, where large troves of scientific studies are kept behind a pay wall, and news media organizations don't buy access because they can't get it on their systems without buying for the whole organization instead of just the journalists. Those sites cater mostly to universities and other research institutions, while news media just sticks to secondhand sources for its info.
Definitely presentation style. Screen sharing and lecture spaces not being limited to the classroom are huge for demonstration. Also, it tends to be more welcoming for discussion if you can contact the creator on social media.
The Khan Academy/Minute Physics/3blue1brown style is excellent for demonstrating more abstract topics, like artificial neural networks:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxe2T-V8XRs&list=PLiaHhY2iBX9hdHaRr6b7XevZtgZRa1PoU&index=1
The EngineerGuy/Thunderf00t/Cody'sLab experimentation approach is better for more concrete topics:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F40ZBDAG8-o
The classroom is only better suited for either of these if the video doesn't address any questions you might have. Even then, you can just find other sources that do address the topics you're having trouble reconciling in your head.
Wanna take this outside, punk?
You serious, dude?
>Welcome to episode 1200 where we continue discussing what some random ass feminist on the internet said
Lmao
Up.
he mostly talks about recent news and politics now actually
For the screencap approach, what do you think are the biggest errors presentors make, and what would you do or like to see done better?
dunderfeet and sargon of a cod
Gonna bump this with an encouragement to subscribe here
>ctrl+f "applied science"
>No results found
>mfw
Applied Science is by far the best for entertainment and education. Ben is creative, concise in his explanations, and isn't afraid to attempt big projects.
For example, he built his own scanning electron microscope and has videos explaining its mechanisms, etc.
Or a less technical but fun video, a refrigerator that runs on rubber-bands.
youtube.com
No lie, I discovered his videos in high school and it convinced me to pursue my interest in science.