ITT: books no woman has ever liked

ITT: books no woman has ever liked

-Frankenstein
-Steppenwolf
-Hamlet

Your mom really liked the ride though

I liked Hamlet and Frankenstein. So that's out.

Traps and trannies aren't real women

I am a woman, not a trap or a tranny.

Wrong
Post vagine or GTFO

What's the point of lying about something like that? Besides, even if I were going to comply with your request, it would be easy to google.

The poster said something no woman would like. I and many others I know like Hamlet and Frankenstein. There is nothing in either to remotely make women dislike them.

Show some skin or shut the fuck up bitch

W R O N G
R
O
N
G

Okay, I'm not that girl, but they're right. I am a guy, and my gf liked Hamlet when they did it in school. So even if they're lying or whatever, the original answer is correct.

>when they did it in school

So not the real version, that's like saying you liked Moby Dick when you read the 7th grade version

Yeah I don't even disagree with their argument (that women can enjoy hamlet and Frankenstein) but if you're gonna say "I do I'm a girl btw" you know what to expect and should come prepared with evidence

Why does this board hate women anyway? My female friends are well read and shit, so is my gf. Reading isn't limited to one gender.

Because their only contribution to human society is what you're seeing in microcosm in this thread:

>I'M A WOMAN, WOMAN HERE, GIRL HERE BTW, DONT HIT ON ME SILLY BOYS BTW IM A GIRL

All they have to offer is what they were born with. Their cunt.

You aren't well-read if you think your girlfriend is.

But, do you need evidence to be a man? Why should she or he or whatever they are provide evidence? Why can't it be taken at face value, when they were posting in a thread where stating gender was appropriate?

Women can't understand certain emotions so there are certain novels they will never get.

You summarized what I was thinking very well, user.

She's read most of the western canon, all of the books commonly mentioned here and the like, and speaks French, German and Russian as well as English (and reads in those languages).

Women don't "like" any book. They only "like" the appearance of reading or having read it.

You don't like Hamlet, you """like""" it too seem well-read. You don't truly understand it.

woman detected

you're adorable

I think you're confusing women with Veeky Forums

>ITT: books no woman has ever liked
Elliot rogers: My twisted world

But stating gender was appropriate here, given the thread topic. She was rebutting his assertion that no man would like those books.

...

And? What does she do with that? I'll tell you, she gets praise.

Because you come here, say IM A GIRL BTW JUST SO YOU KNOW I DISAGREE ALSO IM A GIRL BY THE WAY, and just expect to not be told to shut the fuck up and prove it? Plus like it or not the realpolitik of the website is that it's almost overwhelmingly male, so if you're gonna flout your status as a Vagina-haver then maybe be prepared to prove it.

>Why does this board hate women anyway?
Americans m8, just don't get them started. Most mentally ill nation on earth.

>But stating gender was appropriate here, given the thread topic.

newfag proving he's new by using the same non-argument used by every newfag because he doesn't know it's an old non-argument because he's a newfag

No, she thinks. She's intelligent and enjoys what she gets out of books.

>She's intelligent

No she's not

Maybe I don't because I'm not American then.

I'm sure she does. All she's thinking about is the praise she's going to get.

All women are idiots.

So, am I to understand that Veeky Forums is basically as sad as the rest of this site? Gods, you'd think all that reading would make you able to understand humans a bit better.

This

Women can do anything and still be praised for being a woman. Woman babbles about philosophy she doesn't understand? You can't correct her or she'll get mad at you and you won't be able to sex her.

Women are at their heart shallow. All they want is a man to tell them what to do. They only pretend to like books for status. Have you ever heard of a woman who gave their whole lives for art? Who went mad for her love of beauty. Nope. Because she IS the beauty, the unattainable.

>you'd think all that reading would make you able to understand humans a bit better.

That's why this board understands how useless women are so well.

woman detected

So you think all men before the 20th century were buttmad virgins? inb4 le current year

Pseudo intellectual clap trap that stems from a place of deep insecurity and rejection.

It's ok brainlet woman, your gender is the nigger of the sexes.

...

*Places lips on microphone*
WRONG

MEN WINNING THE GENDER WAR ITT

Why would any man like that book?

that's not happening in this thread though retard.

GUY HERE ;)) , but literally this thread is asking a question about women's taste to which a woman chimed in saying: "No, this actually is liked by some women" and offered their own identity as evidence of its truth.

It's not someone starting a thread with "What do you guys think of my poetry, 18yr old girl from london btw"

Who doesn't want to ride a tiger

Posting pussy on a blue board? Are you trying to get someone banned?

GUY HERE GUY HERE, BOY HERE BTW, DON'T INVADE MY SAFE SPACE SILLY GIRLS BTW I'M A BOY

All they have to offer is what they were born with, their dick.

are you mistaking this for an old-timey chatroom where after you get done valiantly defending her and acting above-it-all, you private message her and offer to become her one true white knight

what other motive could you possibly have for weakly defending attention whoring with an illogical incoherent post, loser?

>implying it works in the reverse
lmao stupid cunt

That doesn't even make sense, you retarded unoriginal bitch.

>This scenario
>men fold instantly upon restricted access to holes
>men completely submissive to will's of women here, cannot convince them or demonstrate why their argument is stronger and instead of seeking compromise they give in on their position.
>women look bad

This picture probably seems insightful if you have only ever cum to porn.

lmao what a cuck you are

WE GOT AN "EVERYONE I DISAGREE WITH IS A VIRGIN"

We have our first "agree with me or you're a virgin" post, everybody!

Please explain what is illogical or incoherent.

You're delusional

post feet faggot

>I'll just post his argument in reverse, that'll get him
Womemes everyone

>Women can do anything and still be praised for being a woman.
not troo btw

>You can't correct her or she'll get mad at you and you won't be able to sex her.
let me know when you leave high school. The adult world doesn't work like that. Sex isn't everything and you should stop worrying so much about it.

>Women are at their heart shallow.
Your opinions are shallower than anything I've heard from a woman. You honestly sound a little bit downy

>Have you ever heard of a woman who gave their whole lives for art?
Yes, I know a few

>Who went mad for her love of beauty.
Yes I know one

>Nope. Because she IS the beauty, the unattainable.
lmao. Now I get what you are.

>you're adorable
hi leddit

Mad nigga

giant post

ain't say shit

cucked by roast

- "white knights and womemes," rupi kaur

>not troo btw
good argument
>let me know when you leave high school. The adult world doesn't work like that. Sex isn't everything and you should stop worrying so much about it.
What exactly is your point?
>Your opinions are shallower than anything I've heard from a woman. You honestly sound a little bit downy
not an argument
>Yes, I know a few
Oh, so you know a female Keats, or a female Van Gogh?
>Yes I know one
explain
>lmao. Now I get what you are.
nod an argumend

Ordinary Men

no es argumento, compadre

you may not be a virgin but you are a degenerate, which is worse. I sincerely hope you're not the one who posted based Evola.

Please, let's stop this fucking slapfight and resolve this issue intelligently:

You have 15 seconds to think 5 women who were geniuses on or above the level of Shakespeare, Goethe, Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Einstein, Beethoven, Joyce, Newton, etc.

GO!

Uh.. Umm.... aah.. MARIE CURIE!!!!

>What exactly is your point?
"you won't be able to sex her" is not a concern in any serious conversation.

>Oh, so you know a female Keats, or a female Van Gogh?
I know some women who have devoted their lives entirely to their art, which is what you said originally.

>explain
Woman who went mad over art. What's to explain?

my gf likes hamlet

she thinks it means baby pig

anything by philip roth
also delete this thread

Wew.

IM STARTING TO GET PISSED
Has anyone here actually fucking read Ride the Tiger? All I here is every saying "lol authoritarian, women btfo, Hindu magic n shit"
That's not what this book is at all. It's mostly
> how modern nihilism presents itself
> dealing with a world where god is dead
> the short comings of Nietzsche and other existentialists
I'm reading this book, has anyone else?

lol even lena dunham likes philip roth r u serious?

>you """like""" it too seem well-read
the iron knee of polfaggots

Not a book but 'On Women' -Schopenhauer

kek

no one has read it because it is a meme book that is shilled here to troll /pol/yps into wasting their time reading it

Curie, Eliot, Sappho, Hypatia and Chatelet

Curie, Noether, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Virginia Woolf, and uh merkel

Most times that /pol/ or Veeky Forums thinks women don't like something, they actually do. Most of the people on here who make broad, angry, and vicious accusations and generalizations of women have probably never even felt a woman's bare finger on their body, literally, if not almost literally, and it's a continuous cycle because no woman would ever put her trust or love in a man so bizarrely out-of-touch with reality and such firm belief in strange, virginal theories.

lmfao

>name five stars that burn as bright as any old star in the sky
>UMMMM... A BONFIRE IN MY BACKYARD, A MATCH, THIS FLASHLIGHT THAT USED TO WORK...

nice try, retards

Only /leftypol/tards say shit like that, and they don't actually read books.

It's not bad, I just don't think it's the book everyone wants it to be. Evola has a very good analysis of a lot of philosophy and literature along with some interesting view points on the current situation of existential longing. It's not full of fascist rhetoric and magic

>everyone is a virgin! Virgin! Virgin!

Found the reason your gender never accomplishes anything. See

I find the best way to deal with women, aside from my mom (whom I treat well), is to ignore them and hope they go away. That being said, whether they (women) like, dislike, or have no opinion on a piece of literature should (in my opinion) have no bearing on a man's appreciation for the work.

You got my gender wrong, this is exactly what I mean, and you're throwing mud thinking I've accomplished nothing. Let me tell you something man-to-man: your greatest desire, to be loved by a woman, is something I accomplish 3 or 4 times a week. Go back to /pol/.

Seriously, the internet has made involuntary virgins more intolerable than ever in history. I can't imagine how wonderful ancient societies must've been by just ejecting them completely to go have sex with sheep and donkeys while the aristocracy participated in orgies and feasts.

>Virgin! You're a virgin, virgin!

Maybe if you spent less time obsessing over your vagina like this, women would have contributed to humanity by now.

By all means though, keep posting how mad you are and talking constantly about vaginas, vagina.

du Chatelet in her own words

>I feel the full weight of the prejudice which so universally excludes us from the sciences; it is one of the contradictions in life that has always amazed me, seeing that the law allows us to determine the fate of great nations, but that there is no place where we are trained to think ... Let the reader ponder why, at no time in the course of so many centuries, a good tragedy, a good poem, a respected tale, a fine painting, a good book on physics has ever been produced by a woman. Why these creatures whose understanding appears in every way similar to that of men, seem to be stopped by some irresistible force, but until they do, women will have reason to protest against their education. ... I am convinced that many women are either unaware of their talents by reason of the fault in their education or that they bury them on account of prejudice for want of intellectual courage. My own experience confirms this. Chance made me acquainted with men of letters who extended the hand of friendship to me. ... I then began to believe that I was a being with a mind

I gleamed that she's blaming men for women's shortfalls. Typical.

>let's not let women vote or have an education
>haha look at them blaming men for their dumbness

They've had the vote and education for a long time now and they're still garbage. Their having the vote is also destroying the same Western civilization that developed the philosophical ideals of feminism and gender equality to begin with.

What?
Are you implying you read posts on Veeky Forums with the default assumption it's likely written by a female? I doubt anybody does and I'm pretty sure almost all assume the opposite.

>outperforming men at all levels of education, gender balance evening out in almost all skilled professions
>"they're still garbage"
by what metric you goon lmao

Please, don't contribute to the noosphere with this "you're smart and funny babe" bs.

lotta ressentiment

>
>Because you come here, say IM A GIRL BTW JUST SO YOU KNOW I DISAGREE ALSO IM A GIRL BY THE WAY, and just expect to not be told to shut the fuck up and prove it? Plus like it or not the realpolitik of the website is that it's almost overwhelmingly male, so if you're gonna flout your status as a Vagina-haver then maybe be prepared to prove it.
Look at the FUCKING thread title you dipshit. That rule doesn't apply when the OP asked for a topic on gender, because that makes it relevant rather than simply a cry for attention. You really are thick, arent you?

You vapid cunt, kys.

What are the shortcomings in the existentialists in his view?
Also, aren't most existentialists from the previous century? Is his supposed update related to historical changes, or is it more universal?