Is there any literature with merit that argues against fapping to porn (sissy hypnosis to be exact)?

is there any literature with merit that argues against fapping to porn (sissy hypnosis to be exact)?

or did non of the great philosophers thought it wise to earn about the dangers of this "degeneracy" and moraless society?

if not then im just gonna fap over sissy shit(not gay btw)

Evola, taoist priests who thought cum contained life force, and Freud.

The Bible argues in favor of masturbating. "Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might" Ecclesiastes 9:10.

I dunno but from experience masturbating sedates the soul. Doesn't stop me from doing it but I can definitely run longer, faster and generally harder if I don't choke the chick for a few daysu.

>sissy hypnosis

You want to hypnotize your sister?

I agree, and sometimes its what I need. I lost a lot of sleep the last couple nights thinking about all I had to do the next day but one night I spanked the monkey and then I slept like a baby.

It's all about moderation, imo. I normally don't like the guy's work, but the parts on vice and virtue in Aristotle's Ethics can give you some good insight into why moderation is important.

bless your soul

Flapping isn't bad. Not even sissy porn.

Sexual humiliation is a longstanding practice that a lot of people get off on but like anything else with a reward pathway you can get addicted though because it's your body's natural response to orgasm, it is unlikely to have negative effects approaching those of drugs.

I do find though, that if I am really horny or really stressed, masturbation can really clear the mind.

I think, realistically that 70% of people have fetishes. Some fetishes involve submission, some domination, some humiliation but most people have quirks and being open to them is an important part of life.

Fetishes are a problem not because of some metaphysical fap sin but because they can stop sex from being an act of genuine communication.

Fetishization is a personal (and pathological) obsession that can disrupt bonding and damage relationships. It becomes a problem when sex is not about the other person anymore but is only about sticking a cactus up your ass or whatever. And if you're reading this and thinking "Well, yeah, so I do like whacking it to increasingly degrading things but it's not really a problem" then you're probably delusional about your own sexual dysfunction.

You sound like a prude tbqh. It's very possible to communicate about your fetishes with your partner, and if they're on board it can make sex even more fun and intimate.

I haven't really experienced a situation where that has happened. Maybe I've just gotten lucky. I do suppose I agree with you in theory though. If you're pursuing your fetish to the neglect of your relationship, then you need to reevaluate.

Probably the most degrading thing I'm into is a little bit of cross dressing but most girls I've been with think it's fun. But then again, It's always been playful and I've never asked them to verbally degrade me or anything. That might off-put most women.

>You sound like a prude

This is the typical defensive response from those who on some level realize that there isn't something quite right with their sexual inclinations. Even if I was a prude it would have no bearing on the actual content of my post. At any rate I'm not a prude I just understand the difference between healthy and dysfunctional sex.

I would say that fetish sex is not really sex at all but rather assisted masturbation. Perhaps that impulsively appealing but it's a disaster for long-term pair-bonding.

>communicating fetishes

If you've ever listened to two people talk about their fetishes, even supposedly "matching" ones, it more often sounds like two ships passing each other in the night than it does communication.

I don't think you have a solid grasp on communication in a relationship.

Something tells me that if you actually knew what you were talking about then you'd be able to muster up more than a one-off pronouncement about my lack of understanding. You've make a declaration; where's the demonstration? It's interesting that you've diagnosed me with a weak grasp on communication in such a uncommunicative manner. It's quite fetishistic actually, like a blind penis spurting dumbly in the night.

Here

Yeah, calling you a prude was a little cheap but come on, sex isn't really that big a deal man, it's just a fun pastime, why not make it more interesting if you can? I can only speak from my personal experiences but my partner and I hardly have a dysfunctional sex life, and it's nothing like 'assisted masturbation', lol. I'd say being open with each other about our more unusual inclinations has brought us closer, thus facilitating a healthier relationship.

I'm curious as to where you draw the line between something being a fetish or just a normal part of sex.

Balzac wrote while masturbating furiously for hours on end with his other hand.

>sex is just a fun pastime

I'm sure you're aware that someone could easily call this an essentially masturbatory view of sex.

I delineated the difference between fetish and sex in a previous post.

I'm likewise curious about something, namely where you draw the line between sex and masturbation. Is it merely the presence of another person? Is there a fundamental difference between the two? If so what is it?

The ONLY acceptable sexual activity is proper intercourse between a mature, eugenic man and and a mature, eugenic woman.
Everything else is degenerate filth, kill yourself.

>sexual activity
>acceptable

holy shit pick one you fucking degenerate mongoloid

How is it a masturbatory view of sex?

As far as I understand it, masturbation simply refers to stimulation of your own genitals, whether another person is present or not. I guess sex would involve contact or collaboration between people with the intent of getting each other's rocks off, and I'd say masturbation could potentially be a part of sex.

I just don't see how you could make a generalisation like all sex involving a fetish is somehow unhealthy, when there's a whole bunch of factors that go into determining a healthy sex life. Perhaps if you're with a person solely to fulfil a fetish, or that fetish is somehow causing dissent within a relationship, then yes, I might agree with you, but it's highly situational, and more to do with the individuals than any particular fetish.

Masturbatory in the figurative, not literal sense.

t. Weininger

>those definitions

Oh, so you're autistic. Nevermind then, this isn't going to work.

To maybe put it in terms you can understand. fetishization is literally the autism of the sexual sphere. If you have a fetish you have sexual autism. Now use this analogy to transfer what you know about autism into this new formulation and you can see the havoc that can be caused.

Yes, how is it a masturbatory view?

I'm not autistic buddy.

I don't think you need literature to make that point. Nofap is step #1 in anything that's worth doing.

If Bach had fapped all day, no music.
If Dante had fapped all day, no writing.
If Michelangelo had fapped all day, no painting.
&c &c.

Everything worth doing is based on not short-circuiting yourself to serve the fundamental principle of procreation. So:

>is there any literature with merit that argues against fapping to porn

Yes. The answer is: everything we call literature.