If you think you're so smart then why don't you tell me how many numbers you know?

If you think you're so smart then why don't you tell me how many numbers you know?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol
youtu.be/yW3zH0-Y9CE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Lots.

benis in bagina :DDD

How many phone numbers that actual want a date or or how many bank account numbers that are mine?

This many.

99999999999999999999999999999999^9999999999999999999999999999999 to the nth degree of an ever separating group of degrees of a circle down to the 9999999999999999999999999999999th power.

Impressive. Isn't it actively difficult to know zero numbers?

We all know just one number, 1, and we only know how to add it to itself many times.

6. Oh wait, 7.

8983941

>you

thats all that counts

You are of an odd countenance, and I can count pretty darn high, too.

seven ate nine
ROTFLMAO

Plenty, but it's set of measure 0, so it turns out I know almost no number

N when N is the number of numbers i know

googol it's the most high number in world of course the numbers are infinite

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol

What about googolplex?

If N is the number of numbers that the guy who knows the most numbers knows, then I know N+1 numbers.

Don't think about that too hard.

I "know" all of them, that doesn't mean I can list them

> how many numbers you know?

I've recently begun developing a good intuition about how large A(G,G) is, where A is Ackermann's function, and G is Graham's number.

Underrated

i know one more

>0,5

U-Uhh I know s-so many numbers. How many do YOU know!? I-im just testing to see if you know how many numbers I know.

name five of their albums

reminder that only the number 1 and number 0 exist

I don't know any numbers. They are all strangers to me.

>I know them but I can't tell you what they are
brainlet detected

I'm so smart that I know INFINITE numbers.

nice

-1/12

oh yea? start listing them

I know of an algorithm that generates any integer between -999,999,999,999,999 and 999,999,999,999,999

That's not how you measure intelligence. Typical girl logic. Kys

This guy knows what's up.
-1/12!!!! Hello. :)

Guess one could say infinity dozen't end ;)

t-they go to a different school!

I know how to generate a countable infinity of numbers but we might not have enough time for that

I can think of seven numbers

You can construct the natural numbers by adding one to itself many times.
Then cartesian product of N plus a partition to construct the integers (just google this construction)
Then cartesian product of the integers plus a partition to construct the rationals

There, I got 0.5. And all I did was add one to itself many times, and then cartesian product itself many times. The rational numbers are technically N^4

youtu.be/yW3zH0-Y9CE
Your counting is inferior to Arson's

2 soon

3 soon. Tuh, didn't think so.

>What about googolplexian?

You are like little babies.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number

1

∞ + 1

checkmate

all :)

0 not number

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Now I know my ABCs

>∞ + 1
=∞

stay dum brainlet!

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
What's my prize?

Personally I only use about 10 numbers regularly, specifically 0 - 9. I just combine them in different fashions to communicate different meanings

>not just using 0 and 1

i know ur mums bagina

All of the numbers plus one very secret number that only I know

Now construct the reals :^)

nice

Those are digits, like these repeating ones

Oh my. Teach me your ways Master

Take the natural numbers and now instead of cartesian product, get the powerset.

The isomorphism is not immediatly apparent

I like your number

So many you can't put them in a set.

>t. discrete brainlet

This man knows a thing or two.

About half of them.

About 6 or 7 my dude

Checked

what are the other 4 or 5?

int x= -999,999,999,999,999;
int i=0;
for(i=0;i

>what are the other 4 or 5?

This, without 5 you couldn't count to 6

???
Way too much work done
Also no need to declare i twice

int x = -999...;
while(x

Oh, meant to reply to

Also if you didn't want to copy and paste the 9's you could multiply x by - 1 when evaluating the condition for even less effort

I'm an EE who had to learn C lol
I fuckin hate programming so I knew the CSperg-out would ensue
Point is the algorithm is babby tier

I only know ten actual numbers desu. I just find the other ones based on my knowledge of those ten.

I know all 6 numbers.

0, 1, 4, 55, 12, 3

Point proven friendo, how is EE?

The number of numbers I know is not itself a number that I know

I know all -12 of them.

whoa...

Yes

since the brain has 100 billion cells, how can someone know more than that? where are all these numbers stored??

Only one. Maybe. I don't know. Fucking Peano.

They're not stored, we only need to remember how to generate them

Nice

You young folks barely know any numbers at all. Back in my day we couldn't just make up numbers all willy-nilly, we sat down and we had to go through each and every one pf them. My formative years were spent on 200-345.

Course ya can't do that no more, no sir.

and if you needed SMALL numbers, you had to dig at the BOTTOM of the cracker barrell where the CRACKERS were all soggy from being on the BOTTOM of the BARREL! And that's where they kept all of the SMALL numbers, as was the style of the time!

And we LIKED IT! Cos it's ALL we HAD!

I don't remember them, it's them who remember me and poke me when they realize I need them.

So then numbers don't actually exist until the moment in which we need them and after they are used they cease to exist until needed again?

all of them

4.3 in

I know all the numbers.
But I can actually say them in 3 languages (German, English, French) so that means I know 3 times all of the numbers and basically i am more intelligent than all of you

Actually yeah

The only right answer

>what are limit ordinals