As it were

>as it were

>A whole nother

Ludovici uses "a whole another" so I assumed if he uses it then it must be grammatically correct, I understand I was wrong.

this is acceptable with an apostrophe

>A whole another

>the fact that

>and so on

>what is the subjunctive
ignorant as always, pep

>While the Zionists try to make the rest of the World believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn't even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organisation for their international world swindler, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks. It is a sign of their rising confidence and sense of security that at a time when one section is still playing the German, French-man, or Englishman, the other with open effrontery comes out as the Jewish race.

>An hull nudder

>a who'le nother

doesn't that count as subjunctive tho...?

>it is what it is

>hitherto
>insofar as
>notwithstanding

A sole nutter

By what metric, stool?

Tmesis.

Pleb here. What's wrong with these?

Go read some Strunk nigga

There's nothing at all wrong with as it were'; OP is just being obtuse
'The fact that' is often redundant
'And so on' is fine but is often overused or patr of sloppy writing
The last ones are fine but can be used pretentiously or in an unwarranted way to make one look smart

Oh.

I hate indeed. You can remove it from any sentence and the sentence has the same meaning.

Is "so to speak" ok? Russians say it a lot

>To be sure

>the universe is my will