Explain this shit.
Explain this shit
fettss.arc.nasa.gov
please go jump off the edge that you think exists
pics taken from different distances from earth
Earth and Moon from Mars
earthobservatory.nasa.gov
Just a reminder that trump wants to shut this down
>Just a reminder that trump wants to shut this down
Yep. "facts" offend his supporters. They become triggered and demand all information that contradicts their religious cosmology be censored.
Im actually laughing hard
You call us stupid while your side has the dumbest demographics.
gb2/bed/ china
>implying I'm not laughing my ass off at both sides
>dems: we take pretend to work for you but really work for big business
>repubs: we say we work for big business but at least we claim to be Christian
third party when? purge the system.
>third party when? purge the system.
You actually think that either side will ever allow the system to be changed in favour of third parties? Surely not without huuuuge public pressure, which I just don't see happening.
Even the voters are okay with compromising their ideals just so the other side doesn't win.
There is literally no way to explain it
A viable third party is not possible without a constitutional amendment. Two parties fighting it out is an emergent phenomenon of the "first past the goalpost" electoral system. A viable third party winning a reasonable share of the vote would mean that, more often than not, nobody gets a majority and Congress chooses the President -- not really a more democratic outcome.
/thread
This. And the chances of a third party winning even a single electoral vote just isn't there. NM did not vote Libertarian and Utah did not vote for McMuffin, despite a race between two people that many people disagree with.
...
lmao so true
>implying that as a non ultra rich person it is rational to support either party.
>im so above it all XD
>be a good goy and fall into party lines
No thanks Mr Sheckleberg, the only politician I would support is me if I ran for mayor.
*tips fedora*