is he really as brilliant as they say he is
many say he is Einstein's successor
if so why isn't he as famous as Einstein was
Tell me about this guy
Eli Campbell
Other urls found in this thread:
bohr.physics.berkeley.edu
twitter.com
David Flores
>if so why isn't he as famous as Einstein was
No experimental work. No way to dumb String Theory down to a level laymen can understand without it sounding like sci-fi.
Jaxon Thomas
This is what Ashkenazi women sexually select for. Notice anything?
Xavier Bell
He has what Ashkenazi women want.
B(ig)
A(shkenazi)
B(rain)
Lucas Rodriguez
Is Ed Witten Ashkenazi or Sephardic?
Colton Adams
damn eggman got old
Sebastian Parker
He's got wit so Ashkenazi.
Sephardics are a bit slow, I think their only claim to fame was Cantor.
Bentley Morris
His ethnicity is actually Italian but his family started claiming they were Jews when they arrived in the US to get all the benefits.
Dylan Garcia
Cantor and Spinoza
and thats pretty much it
Joshua Ortiz
What about Fermi?
Cameron Gomez
Fermi was goyish
He's ours. Go count your shekels Schlomo
Jeremiah White
Most Physicists are completely ignorant about basic philosophy
and you cant be the smartest if you don't have a basic understanding of philosophy
Hudson Brooks
>Most Physicists are completely ignorant about basic philosophy
Meme?
Alexander Brown
He is famous, string theory was renamed M theory in his honor.
Even if he's considered Einstain's successor, he's very modest so he is famous only for the ones interested in physics.
John Gray
>is he really as brilliant as they say he is
if being prolific and being brilliant are the same thing then yes. otherwise maybe not. Has ever made an error that he refused to correct even after it was obvious he had erred? If so, definitely not.
Christopher King
>He is famous, string theory was renamed M theory in his honor.
M-Theory is a different thing from String Theory.
Zachary Young
>stringy type theories getting any fame
Maybe once they prove some of these ideas out to be more than fantasy
Jordan Peterson
You don't get a field's medal if you aren't brilliant in some manner. Just look over some of Witten's most highly cited papers and you'll see that he's contributed far more than just his work in string theory, he's worked in qft, particle physics, cosmology, hell even some stuff in superconductivity, even without his string contributions he'd still be considered among the upper echelon of theoretical physicists.
Carson Cox
>be Andrew Wiles
>prove Fermat's Last Theorem, one of the oldest outstanding problems in mathematics
>still no Fields Medal
>be (((Ed Witten)))
>make up some untestable bullshit in physics
>still no evidence for said bullshit after 30 fucking years
>get a Fields Medal, because why not?
Proof positive that being born a goy is the biggest mistake you can make in your life. You will never, EVER outwit (((their))) intellectual cartel, no matter how hard you try.
Juan Martinez
>Wiles was older than 40 when the proof was confirmed
>Doesn't know why Witten got the field's medal and thinks it's because of string theory
Pretty low quality bait but here's a basic article detailing why he won the field's medal written by another medalist
bohr.physics.berkeley.edu
Bentley Fisher
isn;t it just, in laymen terms, what happens beyond the nucleus of an atom?
Camden Lopez
is their any evidence that Ed Witten comes from italian ancestry?
Isaiah Lewis
>if so why isn't he as famous as Einstein was
Einstein's work was practical and understandable to most people. Ed Witten's work is too mathematical for normies to understand.
Brandon Rivera
...
Owen Butler
?
Jeremiah Gomez
Literally what.