Blacks and whites are equal

was a blanket racist statement? did he say blanket statements in general are an indication of low intelligence? are you too much of a brainlet to understand what anyone here is saying?

see

That must explain why Black people are more likely to be racist than White people.

i highly doubt there are more black people who think they are inherently better than white people than there are white people who think they are inherently better than black people.

this is rooted in history, with black always being associated with evil, death, ect, and white with purity, ect.

whites are more racist, but that's probably due to socialisation

and i dont mean skin colors, i mean the actual colors in symbolism. Then the symbolism is extrapolated to the skin color, used as justification for dehumanization of blacks

>this is rooted in history, with black always being associated with evil, death, ect, and white with purity, ect.

totally irrational

just look at africa, what a wonderful civilization they have goin over there

>You are yourself elevating your position without considering why some people don't trust black, or trust them less and it doesn't really mean they are nazi larpers or inbreds from the KKK.
no, i fully identify and appreciate those opinions. you were right with
> But I think you are taking just the most retarded an autistic form of "literally kill black men they are worthless dogs"
because that's what a blanket racist thinks. Even if they are unwilling to act upon it, if they think inherently all black people are beneath them, that's the racism im referring to

Whites are the least racist people on earth

lol!

>thinking you're better than someone = wanting to kill them
Autismus maximus

so you agree there are probably more racist whites than blacks? what you just said supports my argument

no. thinking you're better than someone based on skin color is as irrational of a thought as wanting to kill that someone also based on skin color.

try to keep up. im not equating the two, im equating the lack of logic required to obtain either of those thoughts.

>just look at africa, what a wonderful civilization they have goin over there
What does this have to do with your point? Low intellect is showing
Are people worse people for not building a society? Would you critizise songbirds for not building a city?
There were kingdoms in africa before european colonialism, such as the kanem empire. The reasons they were behind are too much heat for agriculture and no domesticatable animals

>too much heat for agriculture and no domesticatable animals
w0t

it really doesnt matter, he first said blacks are more racist than whites, then changed it to "well they are justified because look at africa!"

no point arguing with someone who cant even follow an argument

Black tends to be inferior to white people because the enviroment they evolved

Africa is easy mode for life, its warm, big,lots of animals and plants. Europe on the other side is cold, small (so more forced cooperation),there are diseases that were not present in other continents and so on, so in order to survive the european man had to plan forward and cooperate with his peers. If you think about it the biggest civilization of Africa was the egiptians, and precisely Egypt is a hard place to live, its just desert, you could only live there thanks to the Nile

opposite of all you said, then it makes sense
blacks are physically stronger because they evolved in a harsher environment for longer
only place for civilisation is egypt, because there's the nile

>Threads about actually math and science
>Barely any posts at the end of the day
>Thread about race
>Almost 30 replies in less than an hour
Veeky Forums

Physical strength is irrelevant because even the strongest human is weaker than any predator, thats why humans improved their intelligence and long term thinking, strength is not a indicator of a really harsh enviroment, quite the contrary, as strength/muscles needs a good diet to mantain.

of course, just look at the nightly news, who are the people spreading race hatred on TV? Clearly it is mostly whites

>Are people worse people for not building a society? Would you critizise songbirds for not building a city?
>There were kingdoms in africa before european colonialism, such as the kanem empire.

this has to be a troll

>Physical strength is irrelevant because even the strongest human is weaker than any predator
You really are a brainlet aren't you
African humans actually outlast their prey when chasing it on foot, they are more efficient long term runners, that's why they can run fast
also these mental gymnastics about
>a harsh environment doesn't select for strong individuals
are ridiculous

>this has to be a troll
no argument from you, k

>blacks are physically stronger because they evolved in a harsher environment for longer

a person wrote this

U nigger.
Western Africans are really good sprinters. Eastern Africans are really good long distance runners. Get your facts straight

>African humans actually outlast their prey when chasing it on foot, they are more efficient long term runners, that's why they can run fast

Thats the dumbest way to hunt an animal, exactly why the European couldnt afford such inefficient methods because its mean death and had to develop intelligence. In Africa with little work you could survive happily in your mud hut

yes that's right little buddy i'm glad you learned something, that's literally how natural selection works

>African humans actually outlast their prey when chasing it on foot, they are more efficient long term runners

>brainlet

lol

There are differences between races.Not just IQ, but many diseases are rarer/more common among blacks vs. whites vs. asians, and there are morphological differences in development significant enough to allow a skull to be identified as black, white, etc. Studies show that there is a significant gap in IQ between races that can't be explained by socioeconomic factors; see the Minnesota transracial adoption study.

Facts dont lie.

u r trolling
it's obviously not about doing more work because otherwise life is too easy
africans had to resort to these methods
and they did use spears too, african animals just run faster than european ones

ineresting, will read into it

acknowledging that is not what racism is though
all scientists accept this, does that make them racist?

>i'm glad you learned something, that's literally how natural selection works

Phrenology is a pseudoscience.
Facts don't lie.

>blacks and whites are equal stop saying they arent
>science says they have significant differences
wut.

blanket racism =/= pattern recognition

>any white is smarter than every black
>every asian is good at math
>every white/black person has tiny/large penis
>Every black is unable to understand algebra, and therefore it is racist ( )
These are blanket statements and anyone who believes them are likely not very intelligent

>Many blacks act like nog goblins and it is more common to see a black person committing a crime than any other race in america
>Many whites act like their shit dont stink
>Many asians come from strict households and are quite studious.
These are statements often quoted upon ones previous recognition of patterns. Not actually racist, and in reality, requires more intelligence to notice patterns than to not notice patterns

that's because we get raided who samefag

if we had ID's you'd see

there are differences, people should be treated equal
you don't look at a person as a specimen of a particular group, you look at them as an individual
this is philosophically only reasonable because of the great overlap in all cognitive racial traits

any other action makes you a dick, and you should be castrated, outlawed from society and the country, or killed

was referring to something along the lines of pic, not phrenology.

>all scientists accept this

a person wrote this

as the person who made the "blanket" statements, exactly, thank you for clearing that up better than i could.

as said though, there are patterns. No one has a problem with studious blacks who dress and act respectably, and work hard. People hate trashy behaviour and a violent culture that places more emphasis on gangs guns and drugs (among other degenerate things) than pursuit of education or other traditional values. Same reason people hate white gangsters. Its not the individuals, its the individuals that promote and develop the negative collective culture or subculture.

>racism
this is pure anti-blackism at this point

how can it be otherwise
native americans don't exist basically (other than peruvians i guess, but who cares about them)
hispanics are mostly white
muslims are white (islam isn't a race anyway :^)
australians barely exist
asians are actually fine by /pol/ standards

you can leave /pol/, but /pol/ never leaves you

>muh dick
shouldn't you be posting black dicks on /pol/ or something? seriously fuck off of Veeky Forums with this race shit

This again...

The first three papers don't say anything about race. The first and third talk about the immune system, and even say differences in genetics are due to random genetic drift. The second never says there are genetic differences between SIRE, it in fact says the opposite. The fourth also says there are no significant genetic differences between arbitrarily assigned genetic clusters (such as race). The entire middle section is just garbage about SAT scores. Part 6 claims MPCH1 and ASPM have to do with IQ, but that was from 2005, then two more years of research proved neither of those loci had anything to do with mental traits.

>The entire middle section is just garbage about SAT scores.
garbage i have never seen a real source for
i know it says source below, but i've never seen the original report no matter how many times i've asked for it