Name me ONE thing science can do that nature does not already do better

Porn and math?

produce transuranium elements

>GMOs
>what is evolution

>airplanes.
>what are birds

>cars
>what are cheetahs

>computers
>what are brains

Create smartphones

Can you fly around the world with a bird?

Can you travel thousands of miles with a cheetah?

Can you play video games and use the Internet with your brain?

metallurgy.
Microprocessor fabrication.
Software.
subtractive manufacture.

>Name me ONE thing science can do that nature does not already do better.

LAND ON THE FUCKING MOON.

Orbiting space stations.

>LAND ON THE FUCKING MOON.

And then Return.

Long distance communication

Build spaceships and (theoretically) spread complex life to other worlds.

nature already created shouting really loud
try again

What are you referring to? Whatever it is can't reach from China to South America in a fraction of a second

The only good post

I didn't know you could fit 400+ humans inside a bird and then fly them all the way around the world. Thanks, user!

Education, not genetic influences

Does nature not already inherently cause science? We are a product of natural resources and science is a product of human endeavors. Does that not already imply the limiting factor of science to be natural possibilities?

Found the philosopher. Veeky Forums is for science, not feeling good about yourself.

I understand youre probably from a country where you've never seen a nigger in a classroom so the idea is taboo to you but here, in america, they're in nearly every college auditorium and they're quite learned.

Pretty sure throughout time from the beginning several particles already did that.

What is the moon
What are planets
What are galaxies

Light has already done that, much faster and with more iterations too.

making flying metal tubes that provide you with peanuts

...

go to the moon

what is a supernova.

America is literally the worst country to use to try and show show niggers not being retarded. They do far better in the UK.

How do you think the moon got all its impact craters? And on the bodies that impacted it there were probably some living organisms or at least some biomolecules

most things, generally you don't want to imitate nature to begin with because it's really inefficient and convoluted.

Evolution isn't real, if that was true the dinosaurs would have existed and survive noahs flood.

>airplanes
>cars

nature gave us everything we needed within walking distance, we're the ones who fuxked it all up

Science researches nature and is natural, you dip. If you are talking about some kind of retarded idea of a dichotomy between man and nature, quit.
>GMOs
>superior to emergent food
No, GMOs are a shitshow and the industry they aid is an ecological grim reaper sucking biodiversty from the earth into large scale monocultures so the .01% can aquire more wealth.
>cars
>computers
Both lame.

Make a wheel.

Space ships.

None of those things are manned Earth orbiting space stations.

your mom

Weird
around the same time we started taming and training dogs we conquered the world
Maybe those derpy ass dogs are the reason we are the top species of the world. They are after all mans best friend

Your question assumes some dichotomy of science and nature. Which in turns assumes some dichotomy between humans and nature.

This seems to me to be a faulty assumption. Humans are a part of nature, and human activities, such as science, are as much a part of nature as the activities ants, beavers, goldfinches, etc.

Water
fucking
melon

Increase entropy

Writing, I guess. Not sure if that counts as science