He doesn't write in the style of socialist realism

>he doesn't write in the style of socialist realism
Why are you a reactionary? Why do you hate the proletariat?

I was just reading The Noise of Time a minute ago and this is spooky.

because politicizing and poisoning with ideology makes for shitty literature

Dialectical materialism is science not ideology.

Ok. So why would anyone still write in the style of socialist realism when clearly that time has passed? Get some contemporary synthesis.

>revisionist

Shit argument

Good argument

Best argument

Spotted the reactionary. Daily reminder that Stalin is among the most Veeky Forums men to lead a nation and his poems written in his mother tongue are still taught in Georgian schools independently of his fame as le famous Soviet leader man.

In fact he tried to hide the fact that he was a poet in his youth and blocked publication of a collection of his poems, censoring his own work as not fit for public consumption. The mark of a true patrician is one recognizes that one's own work, no matter what sentimental value one may place on it, is not worthy of study. In fact the entire cult of personality was something which he disliked at a fundamental level. He allowed it to be developed because he felt it was important for the war effort.

He would invite scholars of Georgian literature to his dacha to debate interpretations of epic poems. He didn't even gulag them for disagreeing. He read all of the Russian canonical greats and also closely studied Shakespeare and Byron. For philosophy, he had a very solid understanding of Marx, regardless of what reactionary prattle some speak of him with, and studied Nietzsche as well.

Stalin was leagues more intelligent and better read than any other world leader around him. For all of his personal flaws, he was a better leader and probably a better man than anyone living today.

>"when that time has passed"

These things don't just "pass". The 1940s have passed. Socialist Realism is relevant now more than ever as a way for the proletariat class to express their frustration, struggle, and subsequent liberation.

the proletariat class of today are post industrial white people.

Did you just put quotation marks in a greentext?

not true

The proletariat of today isn't in the 1st World. Labor has been outsourced.
The proletariat lives in the slums and shantytowns of the world and in the ruins of bombarded cities, not some nominally poor people in the Midwest United States.

Because neoreaction is the only thing that can save the soul of mankind

Then we are truly doomed

bah. if i want to suck russian cock, i write during a time before the kulaks were getting slaughtered.

Reminder that no real member of the proletariat ever gave a shit about communism and that every prominent communist movement has been LARPing bourgeoise trying to be as fashionable as they can, Stalin included.

>Because neoreaction is the only thing that can save capital from the inevitable proletarian revolution

ftfy

not true

Reminder that no communist has ever been anything besides a religious zealos who sublimated their notions of original sin into self-hatred for their bourgeoise beginnings.

Nice argument, tovarisch

thanks. you too