Are there any good books defending Stalinism that don't lie about the historical reality of it?

Are there any good books defending Stalinism that don't lie about the historical reality of it?

Other urls found in this thread:

wiki.haskell.org/Literate_programming
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>good books
>defending Stalinism
>Stalinism
>good
>defending
>reality
>defending
>Stalinism
>good

is Haskell considered Veeky Forums?

No, sorry to break it to you user

I guess I'll have to write the first one then.

Haskells one of the most lit languages yeah

wiki.haskell.org/Literate_programming

Montefiore's Court of the Red Tsar was apologetic at points, but since you are a revisionist without sources, indeed, who is looking for sources to defend your stance, I doubt that it would be of use to you, being an intellectual midget.

Hard to defend Stalin when he did so much shit that was objectively terrible.

Or you can just burn the ones that already exist.

Stalin was a mistake, user. Leftists hate Stalin more than the right does. In fact, the right loves Stalin for giving them great excuses to just turn away from soviet history. If there is anything good that comes from Stalin it would be to turn ourselves to the question: how Stalin was ever allowed to happen?

h-have you even studied the gulag archipelago?

because i have for 40 years!

>muh sanctity of human life
He wasn't "allowed" to happen he made himself happen like the alpha he was.

Give it a few years.

Liberal.

The issue wasn't Stalin "happening". He wasn't some corrupting force. The problem was the German revolution failed and the Russians were left politically and economically isolated.

Here they're left with two choices. Force their population into a self destructive war with the world in order to encourage revolutions else where OR lick their wounds and try to build the """""foundations""""" for a socialist state i.e. a bourgeois state (which like every other bourgeois state comes about through great exploitation and bloodshed. e.g. America and slavery, France/Britain and colonialism etc)

tl;dr, they were fucked either way.

unironically, my diary

Can you quote some relevant passage?

>Liberal
lel I'm not such thing.

I'm not blaming Stalin himself like some idiot, user. Just that Stalin is not a person to look up to and we need to think of why things have evolved the way they did, exactly like you did there.

Maybe you shouldn't be allowed near a pen and paper. In fact you should probably be shot in the head

'stalin did nothing wrong, kulaks deserved it, fuck you trotsky'

yes