State your political view and recommend a book with your beliefs

Parliamentary Democrat
Harry Potter.

>Political belief: national-socialism
>Book: everything Nietzsche wrote

better bypasses

hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy

social darwinism

Charlie and The Chocolate Factory

Planned miscegenation is the only hope of the human race which naturally tends to inbreeding

M/F by Anthony Burgess

1917 class war now

What Is To Be Done? by Lenin

Complete and utter Agnosticism and relativism about literally everything.

The complete works of RAW, particularly Cosmic Trigger.

Vegetarianism is the fuel of fascism; we will only be safe with the death of vegans

Herman Hesse's stories from Monte Verita

Radical Orthodox
Plato + New Testament

are you aware of the historical setting of les mis?

>what do you do
wait for him to flip flop out of economic necessity

nice

This

>how fat that ass

>Tropic of Capricorn

Yes. The third french revolution, after the second that put Louis d'Orleans on the throne.

I've read the book twice. The name and idea of Napoleon did not lack power in French politics at the time, and Hugo discusses his merits vs that of a democracy at length, although admittedly in imprecise and overly romanticised terms.

Neoreactionary Atomic Communitarianism

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Karl Marx, Rationalist blogs and Mencius Moldbug/Nick Land are all influences.

I THINK DOGS SHOULD BE ABLE TO VOTE

The Diary of Griffin McElroy

National Socialism

The Talmud

Portrait of the Artist as a Young Dog let me see this was the only way

LEGALIZE BUG POWDER DUST NOW

Naked Lunch

>not leaving it to the cats
DO YOU EVEN ELIOT YOU FASCIST FAILURES??

> political view
Liberal Theocratic Nationalism

> book
The Prince, pic related

> But in republics there is a stronger vitality, a fiercer hatred, a keener thirst for revenge

Radical keksism

These dubs

this 2 age

Word. A lot of people seem to think it's about 1789. Admittedly haven't read the book but I'm a bit surprised that Napoleon is such a central figure, given that he died prior to 1832. Figured the Bourbons or the Orleans would be more central. I guess it makes more sense considering Hugo was writing during the 2nd Empire.

I'm going to read it for a school project, but the teacher recommended a simplified 800 page version

Should I tell her to go fuck herself and read the full one instead?

Nietzsche hated antisemitism and all Nazi interpretations of his work are the result of plagiarism by Nietzsche's brother in law, so you're wrong as usual Nazi scum

Hmmmm. This intrigues me.

Ah, yeah, you would think that. But honestly the Bourbons play a relatively small role in the book. Hugo takes more issue with the institutions of France under an uncaring government more than anything. Initially he rallies behind Napoleon, but towards the end of the book very much sides entirely with democracy. A lot of Hugos political commentary comes in essays interspersed throughout the book, and many of them focus heavily on French politics and the influence Bonaparte had on it. Bonapartists were still a huge political faction in France at the time.

Yeah get the full one, you miss a lot of Hugos historical and political commentary, and honestly bar a couple of egregious examples (that can be skipped without losing anything at all) like the Nunnery chapter and the sewers chapter, most of the divergances are enjoyable. Hugo was incredibly passionate and could bring it across in his writing like nobody else.

>political view: democratic totalitarian nationalism

>Book: Plato - Republic

Spaz.

Everyone should die but do all the evil they can before they expire.

My dairy desu.

centrism
never found one, if I did it would probably be too far to one side or the other for me

that or too convinced about centrism is and how it shouldn't change

Eco-facism

The Lord Of The Rings

>ethno-nationalist socialism

>archeofuturism

G. K. Chesterton/Distributism?

youtube.com/watch?v=_76uHtxLlM4

>but towards the end of the book very much sides entirely with democracy
man, if only he'd lived to see the 3rd republics handling of wwi, or the fourth republics handling of anything. might have made him a petainiste.

laura marx

Put A Number On It's article "Climbing The Horseshoe"

>On 25 November 1911, the couple committed suicide together, having decided they had nothing left to give to the movement to which they had devoted their lives. Laura was 66 and Paul was 69
>Vladimir Lenin spoke at their funeral in Paris. Nadezhda Krupskaya said that Lenin told her: "If one cannot work for the Party any longer, one must be able to look truth in the face and die like the Lafargues."[2]
based af

I think it would definitely have soured him on democracy as he viewed it then. Although I think he ended his life as an anarchist or a communist. He took part in the Paris commune in any event, so I think even then the cracks were showing in democracy as it existed.

Filthy degenerate.

tell me more

>Road and Track – polarized glasses don’t work with LCD screens. That last article makes a great point. The other ones miss it.
I like this already

>anarcho-syndicalism

>The Dispossessed

I WOULDN'T HAVE FUCKED HER IF THEY TOLD ME I'D A SISTER

I don't even know anymore.

American Psycho

Radical egoism

Me and My Own by Me

You should check out savtiri devi.

Christian fascist.
The Bible.

Isolationist conservative -- libertarian slant

Since politics is mostly local, I'll post my favorite Canadian political book.

Don't know if I'm more disgusted by the amount of facism or socialism itt

>Liberal Theocratic Nationalism

so what exactly do you believe? That people should be free, but worship God and be loyal to their country?

OI MATE LET PPL DO WHAT THEY WISH, SWANKY BRUV, AIDS IS GOOD, DONT JUDGEEEEEEEE

hi dave grohl

>Fiscal Conservatism

>The Will to Keep Winning - Daigo Umehara

This pic misses Trump standing outside crying "momma's here sweetheart, momma's here!"

anti-natalist

On Women

Non-Sectarian Marxist

The Ragged Trousered Philanthropist

>laura marx
I'd join a cult and kill myself too if I looked like that.

Nietzsche was a cuck who let his waifu get fucked by a Jew, whose people he considered superior.

underrated

Right-wing social, centre-left economic:
Anti-democratic, state atheist, antifeminist, for regulated capitalism.

Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes is like a mirror to me.

>fascism is bad
Why does everyone assume this

Every state with nuclear weapons should immediately attack each other and kill off 99.99% of human life, in the hope that whatever few survive will do a better job than us.

This thread.

all right, I read the whole thing and he's a bit too far over and too self-assured in the "anti-racist" camp (although that one guy replying missed the point), and he had no reason to bring his ethnicity into it, but his points are solid and I mostly agree with his message

lql

some sort of communism, at the very least a strong anti-capitalism with a marxist flavoring, but I am pretty pragmatic - I could momentarily embrace many different kinds of movements if they fit the bill and gained momentum.

the fountainhead - but read it as a sort of over-identifying satire and ya'll laugh your ass off

The Immortal science of Marxism Leninism

The State and Revolution

jews desu.

plot twist: it's actually the link to nazism as evidenced by my post

but then why is nazism bad?

>why is genocide bad?

>What united the '60s generation was not the interest of all, but the needs and rights of each. 'Individualism' - the assertion of every person's claim to maximised private freedom and the unrestrained liberty to express autonomous desires and have them respected and institutionalised by society at large - became the left-wing watchword of the hour. Doing 'your own thing', 'letting it all hang out', 'making love, not war': these are not inherently unappealing goals, but they are of their essence private objectives, not public goods. Unsurprisingly, they led to the widespread assertion that 'the personal is political'.
>The politics of the '60s thus devolved into an aggregation of individual claims upon society and the state. 'Identity' began to colonise public discourse: private identity, sexual identity, cultural identity. From here it was but a short step to the fragmentation of radical politics, its metamorphosis into multiculturalism. Curiously, the new Left remained exquisitely sensitive to the collective attributes of humans in distant lands, where they could be gathered up into anonymous social categories like 'peasant', 'post-colonial', 'subaltern' and the like. But back home, the individual reigned supreme.
>However legitimate the claims of individuals and the importance of their rights, emphasising these carries an unavoidable cost: the decline of a shared sense of purpose. Once upon a time one looked to society - or class, or community - for one's normative vocabulary: what was good for everyone was by definition good for anyone. But the converse does not hold. What is good for one person may or may not be of value or interest to the other. Conservative philosophers of an earlier age understood this well, which was why they resorted to religious language and imagery to justify traditional authority and its claims upon each individual.
>But the individualism of the new Left respected neither collective purpose nor traditional authority: it was, after all, both new and left. What remained to it was the subjectivism of private - and privately-measured - interest and desire. This, in turn, invited a resort to aesthetic and moral relativism: if something is good for me it is not incumbent upon me to ascertain whether it is good for someone else - much less to impose it upon them ("do your own thing").
- Tony Judt, 'Ill Fares the Land'

>implying he doesn't genuinely ask that to people

Moderate

Alamut

i'm a retro-primitivist with strong paleo-futurist tendencies

baldassare castiglione, the book of the courtier

conservatism is good and all but nationalism is just as cancerous as globalism (so, localism/distributism is much better)

The Napoleon of Nottingham Hill

>i'm a retro-primitivist with strong paleo-futurist tendencies
don't you mean Winne-Ther-Pooh not Castiglione?

D'Annunzian vitalist

A hero of our time

reformist marxist

Neo-libertarianism

Against the day

My nigga.

>reformist marxist
>no book
nice