Tfw you realize Schopenhauer's views on women are actually pretty moderate

>tfw you realize Schopenhauer's views on women are actually pretty moderate
How have your views on different philosophies changed radically over the years?

After I raped this bitch I turned gay.

wow, thats edgy!

I wonder what Freud would say about these women

I used to think women were irrational and vapid,

Now I'm content knowing their behaviour is perfectly reasonable.
WE men are to blame. Western men on the whole have become sissified and too hands-off with womankind. This bizarre "outrage" and pushing the bounds of feminism is akin to a toddler testing the bounds of a parent - eventually a parent will give their child a stern talking to or a smack on the botty, with women; they are literally screaming for a rough & tumble dicking to pacify them.

t. aristotle

But it was women that raised these pacified men

we should keep pushing feminism until it rottens the system from inside out, feminism and it's inherent degeneracy is the only way of killing capitalism aka the original degeneracy
after everything falls, tribalism and survivalism will comeback, degeneracy will die thanks to degeneracy
feminists are playing 5D chest and they are too dumb to even realize it

Why do you generalize entire female population by looking at a fringe minority of retarded feminists? Most women, just like most men, are perfectly reasonable normalfags.

>normalfags
>reasonable
nice one dood

take the bog pill

>capitalism aka the original degeneracy

Famillia you can't possibly believe this? The US from it's inception experienced wonderful growth thanks to the free market. Same with Britcuckland.

What we have now is a stone's throw away from Socialism, with society becoming progressively worse and indebted thanks to women getting the vote and consistently voting for social security (which women would seek in a tribal setting) rather than a man's preference for liberty, freedom and the inherent risk it brings. In my eyes, socialism has exacerbated the problem of weak, unambitious men. I won't go into it too much but as a case study, look how worthless Saudi Arabian men are - there is no haram free enterprise there, only cronyism -and- a bountiful social welfare program for natives (Thanks Oil). A little research shows how lazy, incompetent, useless and worthless native Saudi men are, hence why their import all their labor.

Capitalism pre-WW1 was co-opted by der Juden and are responsible for the many ill's we face today.

t. adam smith

gtfo racist

>What we have now is a stone's throw away from Socialism
Socialism could have never existed without capitalism

>Social darwinism and biologism the post
I won't bother to argue with you but I just wanted to say that your point of view is too narrow.


t. guy

Daily reminder.

Butthurt neckbeard.

If you actually believed what you say you'd be living in Syria or Somalia attempting to conquer the land and implementing your doctrines

>Capitalism pre-WW1 was co-opted by der Juden and are responsible for the many ill's we face today.

adam smith never said that and youre not adam smith

whoa

Don't need Sigmund to tell us that everything about her is overcompensatory.

>Wahh! The degeneracy that grew out of capitalism isn't capitalism's fault.

Capitalism sounds great, until you realize that it leads to degeneracy. Capitalists have no moral underpinnings, their only motive is profit, aka that which people want most, aka sensuous animal desires. You can't sell someone a healthy meal and daily exercise when big macs and television are there. Given the freedom to make their own values, most people will cleave towards their basest, animal instincts: sex, gluttony, status, comfort.

The only society that can build great and virtuous men is the society that has massive social stigma towards our carnal desires. "Pure capitalism" is the beginning of the end, and sets a society on the path of degeneracy and relativism.

>The only society that can build great and virtuous men is the society that has massive social stigma towards our carnal desires
just forget about civilization, go rural, problem solved tbqh

Typical materialistic idiot
>if we get money people will start being good lmao
capitalists and commies are two heads of the same hebrew beast

>over the years
I change my views on different philosophies every day

dumb frogposter

>men have no part in child rearing

does I smell a nigra?

Nietzsche and Wittgenstein became shallow thinkers with high levels of autism. Kant became the anti-autist. If you told me this three years ago I think I would have lost my shit

...

Capitalism's purpose has never been to "obtain money".

Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. If a farmer sows his field, on his land, NOBODY can dictate what he should do with the produce, It is simply immoral for a state actor / 3rd party to force him/her to SHARE the proceeds.

The farmer can CHOOSE to sell/trade their produce, the alternative is FORCE, being the means of production being "seized" and productivity coming to a halt. High taxation is a shitty compromise between the two. The Roman Empire in it's prime had taxation as low as 2% which progressively increased (in line with it's decline) until farmers went "fuck this shit", cut their losses and left.

>if we get money people will start being good lmao
I'm being pragmatic here, money will NEVER disappear.
What's your fantasy ? I assume the complete removal of fiat currency and a return to trading for goods / services in kind?

It's funny, because this is a true darwinian approach to society, the countless hundreds.... thousands! who are utter parasites with no tangible skills or occupation, who would perish when they have nothing of worth to trade, relying on charity.

What a sight it would be, as hordes of metropolitan cucks descend upon rural villages, attempting to trade their pointless gadgets for a few grains or vegetables.

Growth is degeneration.

Ok I see where you're going with this.
Traditionalism would be my preference too, but it's an unworkable fantasy.

Any nation in this era which remains stagnant will get cucked & conquered, by military, economic or cultural means.
There are many African tribes living like they did in the Stone Ages - no "growth", while the nation's resources are raped by aggressors.

It boils down to this; cuck, or be cucked.
You need to grow to become a powerful cucker.

Yes, I now see both Bertrand Russell, whom I adored, and Chomsky, with whom I corresponded, as serious symptons of intellectual decay.

>It boils down to this; cuck, or be cucked.
Is there ever a point at which we will be able to transcend this fuckery and simply have enough for everybody?
Fuller would argue we are at that point already, but the memes in power (aka, law and capitalism) do not want us to realise it.

There we go

...

No.

How rouge-pilled are you? Vast IQ differences between the races make it impractical. It's why the libertarian ideology is also a fantasy.

The fact of the matter is, hark back to the industrial revolution and consider the demographics of a nation that grew to be successful - it would be wise to assume the average IQ was pretty high, research has shown there is an IQ cut-off for a successful democracy. It's one of the reasons why Africa is so fucked up.

IF a successful western nation had instated protectionist policies and employed eugenics (theoretically, ignoring moral arguments) - your ideology could genuinely be fulfilled on a national level. But there's something about higher intelligence which opens up the doors to increased empathy and compassion, and when the needs of her citizen are fulfilled (good times, booming economy) it results in increased socialism and degradation of society as the average IQ lowers.

Good times breed weak men.
Hard times breed strong men.

It's a well established cycle famillia.

Not him but there's literally no depth to your philosophical thinking. I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't even picked up the most rudimentary introduction to political thinking.

>What we have now is a stone's throw away from Socialism,

>limited wealth redistribution in an entirely free market capitalist system is a stone's throw away from collective ownership and centralized control of the means of production

OK lad, stop posting.

>Good times breed weak men.
>Hard times breed strong men.

>It's a well established cycle famillia.

I know, I read that image macro on /pol/ too and thought it was totally badass. Then I put some Sabaton on my speakers and masturbated to anime.

Is it wrong? Do you refute it?

Ad hom.

>womyn claim they aren't just vaginas
>regardless of the topic all feminist rhetoric is >muh vagina

Damn... thinking over here...

Listen, kid, /pol/ as a board is redpilled and therefore BASED. They take on SJWs and nu-males and show them that their feel-ridden rhetoric and questionable logic is flawed and quite frankly embarrassing.

There is nothing wrong with being "racist". There is a certain hierarchy as is evidenced by Holy Scripture, the continent of Africa, and The Bell Curve.
Nor is there anything wrong with being conservative. There's a reason women should be subordinate to a strong authority figure - they are too intellectually feeble-minded to properly comprehend the depth of existence, politics, and spiritually and hence need to be disciplined, like a dog or a child (both of whom they share similar cognitive abilities with).
Also, see how sex is media and hedonistic life styles are propagated everywhere. Women once again need to have their sexual life controlled by a man, or a group of men, who decide who can purchase her , instead of letting them decide for themselves; then you get interracial marriages and other such degenerate filth that is effectively white genocide.

In short, this is not reddit, this is Veeky Forums. We are politically incorrect because we aren't afraid. Like the philosopher king in Socrates' basement, we've seen the Truth, the redpill, and we cannot go back. We have seen to much and will never return to such parochial views as those of leftists.

If you want a hugbox, this isn't the place. We have been liberated a long time ago. Just a heads up, kid. You'll learn soon enough. When you find out how deep the rabbit hole goes, you'll be a different man, a REAL man.

I've given up reading these things

...

But you still seem to be operating on the notion that there would be any reason to compete for any resources.

In other words, in non-hard times high IQ gives handouts to low IQ because of some weird compassion, and you have a problem with that because they don't deserve it. But what does it matter if there is LITERALLY enough resources for literally everyone to have more than they could ever need (e.g., food, glamorous housing, meaningful occupation, travel, etc.).

Like, even if there really is a inequality in IQ levels and other such criteria, why do you CARE if the resources are equal (even if undeserved for some) if you already have everything you want?

10/10 satire. If it is earnest, 20/10 satire.

Fuck off with your commie bullshit. Who gets to define need and want?

>LITERALLY enough resources for literally everyone to have more than they could ever need

What the fuck kind of techno utopianism is this

>What the fuck kind of techno utopianism is this
One that we could make if we didn't spend most of our resources (time, materials, and human energy) working for our memes of military, finance, and the endless manufacturing and marketing of millions of different brands of the same shit.