What do I read now that I realize that capitalism is to blame for all the things that I don't like (immigration...

What do I read now that I realize that capitalism is to blame for all the things that I don't like (immigration, political correctness, people having sex outside marriage, drugs/alcohol, tattoos/piercings, multiculturalism, etc) but I don't want to be a commie? I still want to be redpilled and be able to hate leftists.

Who has written a good piece or work on capitalism without degeneracy?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/mU1JmMUkP84
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Shut up retard. All those things you mentioned have nothing to do with fucking capitalism.

>he unironically believes this

Yeah, if you're not truly red pilled.

Turn to critiques of capitalism that aren't left wing? The right wing has been saying the same shit for a century or two, as well.

Even some left wing critiques are OK, as long as they aren't full retard deterministic economism or
>EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE AND UTOPIA WILL BE ACHIEVED IF I THROW A FIREBOMB AT THIS RANDOM CAR XDDD

...

That's what I'm asking for, retard.

Recommend me someone who theorizes about how we must return to earlier times

>want

fuck your feelies mate. either follow your new line of thinking wherever it leads you, or stay the way you are and quit asking questions. you don't get to have it both ways.

He's right you know.

Maybe you should pick up some books on economics, really. Start with Adam Smith.

Aristoteles: Nikomachian Ethics.

you sound like a terminally boring dude

Dostoyevsky

It's not capitalism which bears the responsibility, it's people. Capitalism might've established the conditions which gave rise to your presumed degeneracies, but ultimately it's the community themselves who engage and participate. All capitalism did was present them with an opportunity, they were under no obligation to enact it.

>implying human beings have the agency to do anything other than react to their material conditions

>tfw you hate capitalism, communism and fascism at the same level and you're neither a "redpill" nor an SJW

what do

nothing. keep on keeping on. all that shit is gay consumerist materialism.

don't be too hard on him. he even posted joyce.

X L R 8
L
R
8

will give us something new, at least

CHRISTOPHER LASCH
GIORGIO AGAMBEN
JEAN BAUDRILLARD

How about you fuck off and read some socialist thinkers, if you're capable of having opinions that don't derive from memes.
Jesus Christ the "alt-right" is the most cancerous thing that ever happened on this place. People on leftypol actually know some economics.

Because I don't believe in 'muh class'. I want something from a whitenidentitarian perspective

youtu.be/mU1JmMUkP84

^this bullshit is basically as good as you're gonna get. kys pls

So you follow right-wing identity politics and spend your time blaming everything on liberal identity politics and the Frankfurt School, got it.
I'm sure you feel very enlightened.

Not an argument

E Michael Jones

Books can be a bit pricy but they're worth it.

All of his talks are free on youtube.

>Wah why are people doing things I don't like
>Oh it must be because of the structure of our current society
>It's not an oversimplification at all!

...

>the structure of our society doesn't influence its inhabitants at all!
dumb post lad

Literally nobody in this thread can explain how those things are caused by capitalism. I challenge someone to try. The only one you could maybe make a case for is immigration and it's not the kind OP hates. OP, stop reading crypto-Marxist filth and read NRx or something.

>"nobody can explain how those things are caused by capitalism"
>this is exactly what Marx explains
>lol but he doesn't count XDD

NRx is a unique kind of stupid

The Ancien Regime didn't have these problems, they only coincide with a rise in liberalist capitalism.

It still btfo you though

...

>capitalism
>state-sponsored

the irony

that's how it goes
capitalism cannot survive without the banks or the state
ancaps just argue the same way communists do
>that's not true communism/capitalism

>HE THINKS CRAPITALISM CAN EXIST WITHOUT FIAT MONEY

Wew.

Faust Pt. II
On the Jewish Question
Anyone from antiquity

>he thinks the federal reserve isn't a private corporation

>tattoos/piercings
You know those have existed for thousands, possibly millions of years

Wrong.

Capitalism example:

I am a farmer. I have a surplus of corn, but no shoes. My neighbor, a shoemaker, has a surplus of shoes but no corn. I trade corn for shoes, we both profit. There is no government involved.

Socialism example:

I am a farmer. I have corn, but not a surplus, because if I did it would be unfair to less productive farmers. I can only produce an equal amount of corn as my fellow farmers. Because of this, I am not efficient. My corn is no longer worth a pair of shoes. My neighbor loses food, I lose a new pair of shoes. The entire country starves and wealthy capitalist countries continue to adopt socialist policies to their own detriment

Good question.

Milton Friedman is one from this century. Alfred Marshall is from the end of last century. Anything involving London authors, urban Europe, and the afterbirths of nationalism.

You're a fucking retard.

You're taking small example with the capitalism and comparing it to a large example with communism.

"true capitalism" has never existed and will never exist to rule a land

>immigration, political correctness, people having sex outside marriage, drugs/alcohol, tattoos/piercings, multiculturalism, etc
All of those have been happening for thousands of years.

>thinking that Capitalism alone is the cause of all those things

if you think that material conditions supersede culture, you're pretty clueless

Henley David Thoreau has some pretty insightful stuff involving suffrage/religion. Also nature.
SO much nature.

The Servile State
Economics for Helen

Nothing to do with capitalism, barely anything to do with degeneracy, stop.

Does Faust 2 really? Have it on my shelf, haven't read it yet. This seems unlikely to me since Faust 1 didn't touch on these topics at all.

Walden is a great fucking book. A great. Fucking. Book.

Prose.
Philosophy.
Style.
Themes.
Method.

Everything.

Jesus, the stupidity.

Secularism caused capitalism.
Based upon ancient science, only works if one accepts that ancient science.

>Based upon ancient science

completely false

>correlation equals causation
Shut the fuck up you moron.

t. leftypol

Why? You already believe this so just sit around congratulating yourself on being "redpilled" like all the others who are ruining our board.

Not an argument.

>how we must return to earlier times
seriously kill yourself you goddam moron

Yes it is, he based his ethics upon his science.

It's important we get women back in the kitchen. We've seen what's happened to the West since they got the vote

Underneath capitalism are system independent mechanisms which shape biology and emergent social orders. I suggest 1000 years of nonlinear history for a non anthropocentric perspective on political trends

DIE degenerate retard
the fact that you need your penis to serve as a way to be better than others is pathetic. How about basing your pride in something you do you fucking faggot (aside from making me mad of course)

Wouldn't this be more or less the race of Übermensch?

t. doesn't understand anything about philosophy

t. redditor

no idea what you mean. if you're using that word in Nietzsche's sense, then you couldn't be more wrong.

you're thinking of Ben Stiller

Aristotle's conception of virtue is based upon his science. Without that context, that concept is irrelevant. The Greek conception of virtue is irrelevant to the way we conceive of it.

No, Nietzsche refused the concept of nationalism. But National Socialism argumented with the figure of the Übermensch in a racial manner. The way he described the duty of people in his imagined system kind of seems similar. He clearly is a fascist as I see it.

National Socialism didn't "augment" anything, it just stole the concept and attached an arbitrary definition to it. Nietzsche's Übermensch is a radical individualist, so it doesn't make sense to associate it with any kind of society at all.

read a book

I have, why don't you actually read Aristotle?

This.

To the other user, you are flat out wrong, as stupid and misguided as Nietzsche's sister.

I agree with that. Still they used references to Nietzsche's conceptions and used them as a supporting argument (not augment) to legitimize their ideology.

Introduce me to her then.

A tenuous link to a shitty argument supporting an illegitimate ideology.

She's dead, I hope you meet her real soon.