D e v i l i s h

So am I, and I don't care, I'm proud not to be associated with modern women, i.e. worthless whores

>enjoying bags of meat worth nothing

I love the company of women

Because I'm not a porn or internet addict (I never watch porn and don't masturbate), just the pure feminine energy is enjoyable to me

I have alot of sex, but sometimes I'll just hang with my ex-gf, have a fun talk, enjoy her silly little laugh and her always fresh smell

I sincerely believe a man is at his best when he is exposed to both masculine and feminine energy in his daily life

Nothing a quick google search couldn't answer.

But since the spoon is already in my hand, the answers are German and Yes.

Oh, I get it, you're a nu-male who likes getting fucked in the ass by a strapon, makes sense

I don't even understand what is trolling and what isn't anymore

>nu male
>strapon meme
perhaps you'd have more fun on r/theredpill?

>proud to not be associated with worthless whores
doesn't sound that way friend

This.

assume funposting until proven otherwise

>masculine energy
>feminine energy

schopenhauer got a lot of tail. women still liked money and fame back then too

Social energy is not pseudo-science, it's very real

Call it vibes, good emotions or whatever you want, it's still a thing

pretty good, man, pretty good

>dogs don't count

Maybe if you believe in the social sciences it exists. The social sciences are themselves pseudo-sciences. Using statistics is not a sufficient condition for doing science.
Socializing is entirely transactional in nature. To socialize is to participate in a free market where the goods are relationships and the currency is you appearance, job, hobbies, etc. Any vibes you feel is your brain cucking you into believing you're doing something of more worth than gaming the auction in World of Warcraft so you don't go insane and kill yourself.

Reminder: Stirner's philosophy was built upon "spooks".

Mate

The very effect of things like physical touch, positive emotions and socializing is PROVEN and purely scientific

If you want to rationalize masturbating to chinese cartoons all day for yourself, fine, but human beings are social creatures

>The effect
The effect is exactly what I'm talking about. It's your brain attributing value to things that are just valueless escapism at the end of the day. You can measure the response from doing heroin or in fact masturbating to cartoons all day, but there's no energy or vibes related to those things.
The only things that exist are escapism and your brain's desire to not die. No energy, no vibes, nothing else. Even the desire to procreate is just a desire for immortality more than some independent, benevolent drive.
Take the reality pill.

Tell me your secrets.

Schopenhauer had an active sex life, he was just traumatized by his mother making him watch her get fucked by the intellectual giants she invited to her salons

You talk like you assume that you're somehow in complete control of your brain

Unless you're some sort of self-hypnotist, your brain will know the difference between hot sex with a breathing woman and handrubbing to anime

Besides, I don't see what's beneficial about such a worldview
>I want to be alive
>I want to enjoy life
Why should it bother me that the joys are "false"?

schopenhauer just pointed out that all women are like his mom, i.e. worthelss whores who care about nothing but chad cock and destroying whiteness

For sleeping with women?

There's tons of resources out there, but it's honestly just about dating down

So if you're say, a 7/10 in attractiveness, you're going to score easy with 6/10s
However, if you are a 7/10, and manage to CONVINCE an 8/10 that she is a 6, you might have a solid chance

Also, realize that females are attracted to social status, more than looks
So as a man, your attractiveness is never frozen solid, you can go from 6/10 to 8/10 by just having a better mood

Your brain literally does not know the difference. If you prefer two things equally, there is no benefit to doing one or the other. This is precisely because you don't have complete control over your brain. Pleasure is distraction from death. I'm not claiming joys are false, I'm giving you access to greater pleasure by suggesting your drop your biocuckoldry. I probably enjoy my life far more than you because of my worldview. You'll of course convince yourself that I don't because it's impossible for me to enjoy the wrong things as much as you enjoy the right thing. Enjoy your self-imposed misery.

They are not false

I'm sure you enjoy it, I'm just questioning how happy a view like that truly makes you

To me, happiness is struggle and hardship, followed by an eventual reward, I want a life of ups and downs
Confining yourself to locked in spaces with only a computer screen for company just seems too bland for me, I can't deal with it.
I want to run, jump, laugh, fuck and all

You claim it's misery, but I disagree, the real misery lies in not having a passion, not having an external goal to work towards

That's just my opinion on it

Why are you posting pics of literally me irl?

Running, jumping, fucking are all as bland as dying alone, in front of a computer at heart disease at 55. Passion is just comfort in the certainty that what you're doing is worthwhile. It's unnecessary. Needing a struggle to highlight your accomplishments or wanting external goals are just manifestations of uncertainty.

WHY DID ADMINS DELETE MY POST

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

but lmaoooooahahahahaha

i love you and i'm never forgettting this.

...

The Last Man

>I love the company of women
There's nothing like it. All my life I've preferred having women as friends for this reason. I agree male energy is necessary to a degree, and I should probably get more of it, but I rarely if ever come across a male who I have the desire to start a friendship with. But I come across girls like this all the time.

I think part of it might be guys are more set in their ways. So if you're not a "typical" guy there's not going to be much compatibility. Meanwhile the girl/guy dynamic is a much more adaptable and compatible one I think. There's a reason guys marry women and not men.

There's also not really any competitive aspects with girls as friends. Or as much jealousy at different class levels. I also think that at heart, women are better people than men.

Finally, if you're a sociable yet "antisocial", introverted person who likes doing their own thing and is not a typical "male", it's easy to find girls who are okay with this or even the same way who are fairly normal. But I think in general guys who are like this are much less likely to be cool and normal and more likely to be weirdos.

Also, sex and stuff.

This. At the uni I go to at least, the women on average are much more tolerable than the men. Men are much more shallow, collectivist, and prone to offense than women, which Veeky Forums had me believe was the oppoosite way around. That being said, the worst women are undoubtely much worse than the worst men and the male aesthetic is so much better than the female counterpart.

The Spooked Biocuck

For reference

>the male aesthetic is so much better than the female counterpart.
???

I like the way men look better than women.

I don't know what people like about big tits. They look like fucking tumors. But really skinny girls are also unsavory b/c they are twigs and seem like they could break like one at any moment. The male look, in its ideal manifestation is the perfect middle ground between thicc and thin

I agree big tits are way overrated... and the male aesthetic is underrated... but I think you might be gay dude.

It's not gay at all. What's truly incredible is just how suited the penis is for the male asshole. The complementarity of bi-homo (not homosexual) anal penetration is truly beautiful. There is no analogue for women.

What are the essentials of misogynist literature?

I would be gay if LGBT people weren't so awful. Seriously, gay men are like the worst aspects of the male and female clumped together

In theory I wouldn't be opposed to being bi, but LGBT's are so shit it's honestly not even worth the effort finding males I could date that are mildly tolerable. It's much easier to find women

As much as I admire male aesthetic myself, wide hips of a female are the finest human feature there is.

>That's just my opinion on
Behold the cowards last refuge!

Boys are objectively the pinnacle of aesthetic perfection and the purest form of love, as Plato attests.

Women are simply a necessity for reproduction, hence the importance placed on them by the male psyche and by society at large.

i like it when girl sits on my face

I haven't laughed so hard in WEEKS

thats a shit-tier fetish

regards,
haver of fetish for boys

German and no.

False flag post.

...

German native speaker here. He wrote in German and no männlich (masculine), Mensch (human), Erwachsener (grown up/adult).

You don't know what you're talking about. The brain is extremely easy to deceive. You should concede this specific point and go back to the basics of what you were actually trying to say.
Yes, there will be different results for living your life while masturbating every day as opposed to having sex with a woman frequently, but that has nothing to do with the point you're trying to make now.

>men more collectivist
No way I don't know about your personal cultural surrounding, but this has to be a statstic anomaly/ artifact of some sort. Think about evolutionary biology females are completly lost, if the tribe expels them. Males on the other hand could surive longer and take their female with them and have offspring. There is some truth however to, that males will always be at the bottom of society and on the top. So there will be worse and better females and very strong selective pressure on the worse ones, which will make them struggle hard and often go "all in". The female sex will be more "beautiful" since males are attracted to certain female physical characteristis and females nearly don't take them into Account and chose based on whealth and generosity etc.

>better than females males

>Boys are objectively the pinnacle of aesthetic perfection
Nope, wide hips are. And boys are noodly and flimsy. An ottermode male in the prime of his life is the best male form.

Heh

I mean I know about that but the males always seem more apprehensive to anything outside their "sphere" and are more prone to form cliques inside their sphere. I mean when you think of nationalists the first image that pops up in most people's mind isn't a women. Not to say that women don't do the same thing or that they can't be nationalists but I actually find masculinity to be much more collectivist than femininity. I think the supposed "self-reliance" of masculinity is illusory b/c this self-reliance is often only after a unquestioning surrender to an socially acceptable ideal or a group. Say what you will about modern femininity but I think the inherent empathy and tolerance within the textbook definition makes femininity more open-minded and individualist than men. It makes them more versatile so-to-speak.

These are just observations I've made throughout my life though. As you said, it could be an anomaly.

Women will spread their legs to any strong and alpha male regardless of his origin. It's their nature. It's our duty as men to form boundaries and protect them.

I want to know more about that, what i have to read?

You proved his point.

I wasn't trying to do otherwise.

>masculinity to be much more collectivist than femininity
Women tend to be more religious, and vote for left-wing parties more too. I think that men tend to value the values and ideology of a group more than women, whereas women tend to value more the personal connections they get from a group (and are always seeking new ones). Your example is pretty weak, you just use the stereotype of a nationalist to illustrate how collectivist men are.
Also, males are pretty much conditioned to feel some shame at depedency (though more feministic women might, too), which is a more accurate portrayal than simple self-reliance.

Females in the evolutionary perspective where around the protected camp most of the time searching for predictable sources of food like beeres and roots in the near surrounding area (actualy more roots contray to what many think), this is also the reason the see colours better, while being protected by the males in the camp. The males formed strong bounding hunting groups to collected mosaically distributed food in a hostile enviorment, hence better understanding and eye for motions, calcultaing trajectories and strategic planning and threat analysation capabilities. Male bounds are stronger, because they have to be, but they are more likley to voice their critical opinion on something, than females.

Females are bad at recogincing threats, which don't seem very urgent at the moment and See more abstract, this is because most females were never really involvt in physical confrontation with others, because of the Protection and if the enemy managed to get only some of them were killed and most became peossession of the higherups in the tribe, which conquered them.

Is english your first language?

Ask me your questions.

How can I be more charismatic?

fp fucking bp

>Women tend to be more religious, and vote for left-wing parties

Fair enough, but both of these can be justified on individualist grounds way easier than things like nationalism

>I think that men tend to value the values and ideology of a group more than women, whereas women tend to value more the personal connections they get from a group

All that seems to suggest is that men are collectivist on a much larger scale than women. I guess you could make the argument that they're both still collectivist but if what you're saying is true then the women are still more individualist b/c their motivation is internal (their personal emotions and connections within a group) as opposed to external (ideologies).

>you just use the stereotype of a nationalist to illustrate how collectivist men are

If it's just a stereotype, can you explain why it's generally misguided when it comes to reality?

If you want more examples then there are fraternities of all kinds (before you mention sororities, there are significantly more fraternities than sororities). This is getting a little anecdotey again but I find fraternities at my uni are way more loyal to each other as opposed to sororities who are more prone to turn on each when they feel a personally ideal has been broken.

>males are pretty much conditioned to feel some shame at depedency

That is certainly a stigma of the masculine but you can't really conflate that with anti-collectivism, especially since this shame of dependency is usually predicated on the basis that you are being an inconvenience to another entity and should bottle up your emotions so as to not disrupt the order of things.

There are plenty of gay men who live outside of mainstream gay culture.

Females are great at recognizing threats. (To use your "it happened in caveman days and thus that's why things are the way they are today" line of reasoning, this is because they needed to recognize threats to themselves and their offspring while the male was out hunting.) They're just bad at responding to them.

Of course, but it's just much easier to find decent women rather than having to wade through a small minority to find an even smaller minority within that group that aren't total garbage humans.

There is one gay male I am merely friends with. He's pretty cool but a more serious relationship wouldn't work for several reasons.

I totally get this. Most guys are so desperate and insecure, thinking they have to prove something. Never have I met a woman who was insecure about her femininity. Most guys, on the other hand, will have an aneurysm if you call them gay.

I wanna see her walk

And hence his dad killed himself.

>vibes are not real
>it's the brain's desire
Kek, do you know how ridiculous you sound? Trade one metaphor for another and all beliefs are still grasps at straws. Stop being so hostile because you're both deluded in different ways.

An argument over clouds.
>its a duck!
>no it's a pony!
This is your brain on Veeky Forums.

Kek!

I agree with you completely user.

thank you

>insecure about her femininity
I never thought about this being a thing. Is it even possible?

...

It isn't really that funny.

this

this, obvious

...

>Never have I met a woman who was insecure about her femininity. Most guys, on the other hand, will have an aneurysm if you call them gay.
That is a meaningless comparison. You would have to compare how women react to being called butch, or how secure they are in their masculinity, for your argument to make sense. Even then there wouldn't be as much social and cultural baggage as there is with being called gay to a man, but at least your argument would be coherent (albeit wrong).